Dismiss Notice

to Ford Explorer and Ranger owner generated reviews, discussion, tech tips, how to articles, off-road modifications, events, and more! Since 1996 we have been the #1 Ford Explorer resource on the Internet. We also cover the Explorer Sport Trac, Mercury Mountaineer, Lincoln Navigator, Mazda Navajo, Mazda Pickups, and the Aerostar.

Register Today It's free! This box will disappear once registered!

Opinions?

Discussion in 'Modified 1991-1994 Explorers' started by Flip4ford, October 6, 2010.

  • Searches ExplorerForum.com
    1. Flip4ford

      Flip4ford Active Member

      Joined:
      August 24, 2006
      Messages:
      628
      Likes Received:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      16
      City, State:
      Newton, KS
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      94' Sport
      I have a pretty decent rig right now-- but I have a few TTB issues. (My front passenger axle is rubbing on the upper rear of the TTB "housing" amoung others) I have a buddy going to Iraq and he offered to sell me his project ranger. Dana 44 high pinion front- 8.8 rear - both full width. High steer, ARB Lockers, 5:13 gears, every bell and whistle-- it has no motor or tranny.

      I do some moderate wheeling, not a DD, but I do drive it to CO to do trails. I took it to Disney last weekend and did some harder stuff, but not radiacally extreme. Some of you wheeled with me @ krocks and know how I wheel (krocks is moderate) I have a stock 4.0, and 4:56 gears, M5OD, with stubbler and 33's. Probably go no bigger then 35' or 36's in the future.

      So whatcha all think? Is it worth it to upgrade to Dana 44 SAS on a first gen? (The rear would be about the same.) Those of you that did the swap was it worth it? Is there that much more flex?

      I am looking at quite a bit of $$$ for my budget so I wanted some input.
       
    2. Support EF

      Join the Elite Explorers for $20

      Explorer Forum has probably saved you that much already, and will continue to save you money as you learn how to diagnose and fix problems yourself, and learn which modifications work without having to experiment on your own. Elite Explorer members see practically no ads, can add their own profile photo, upload photo attachments directly to your posts and Media Gallery, create more private Conversations, and more. Join Today. Your support is greatly appreciated.


      to hide adverts.
    3. 4x4junkie

      4x4junkie Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      March 28, 2002
      Messages:
      1,347
      Likes Received:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      0
      City, State:
      So.Calif.(San Fernando Valley)
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      '94 Ranger, '90 Bronco II
      It probably would depend on how much you have into your existing setup and whether you want to go full width or not.

      If you're not already set up with lockers and what not and want the wider stance, I'd say go for it. Both setups will flex quite well when setup correctly however a wider stance will add some to the amount of height you can place your tire up on a rock without it getting tippy.
       
    4. Flip4ford

      Flip4ford Active Member

      Joined:
      August 24, 2006
      Messages:
      628
      Likes Received:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      16
      City, State:
      Newton, KS
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      94' Sport
      Thanks Junkie. I guess I would get more flex, and vertical travel. I plan on wheeling in even tougher terrain. I guess when you have the "bug" where do you stop?
       

    Share This Page









    We Support Our Troops!