Dismiss Notice



Register Today It's free! This box will disappear once registered!

Tellico Action Alert Tellico Closed!!!

Discussion in 'Meet and Greet and, International Explorers' started by CodePoet, February 28, 2009.

  • Searches ExplorerForum.com
    1. CodePoet

      CodePoet Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      July 11, 2002
      Messages:
      2,426
      Likes Received:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      58
      City, State:
      Indianapolis, Indiana
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      1993 XLT
      Time to put the pen to the paper guys! I'll be sending my this week. :thumbsup:

      Dear Interested Party:
      The USDA Forest Service is seeking comments on two proposals regarding management of the Upper Tellico Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) System:

      1. An Environmental Assessment (EA) for the long-term management of the Upper Tellico OHV System. You may download a copy of the EA and related graphics at http://www.cs.unca.edu/nfsnc/tellico. If you would like to receive a paper copy of the EA, please e-mail your request to: comments-southern-north-carolina@fs.fed.us or call (828) 257-4817, and one will be mailed to you. For questions concerning the project or the EA contact Candace Wyman, Project Coordinator, at 828-257-4816.

      2. A temporary closure of the Upper Tellico OHV System for resource protection, effective April 1, 2009. This closure would prohibit possession or use of a motorized vehicle on a road or trail within the Upper Tellico OHV System, with the exception of highway-legal vehicles on 420-1 and certain other exceptions described in the closure order until a final project decision is implemented.The Upper Tellico OHV System is located on Tusquitee Ranger District, Nantahala National Forest, Cherokee County, NC. In June 2008, we publicized a proposal for long-term management of the System, designed to greatly reduce the amount of soil leaving the System and entering the Tellico River and its tributaries, while still providing an OHV trail system. This proposal is referred to as the “proposed action” or Alternative B and is described in detail in Chapter 1 of the EA. We received around 1,500 public comments on the proposed action. Alternatives to the proposed action were developed in response to the comments and environmental issues identified by the Agency. A wide range of comments was received, so six alternatives are analyzed in the EA, identified as Alternatives A through F. We would now like your review and comment on the alternatives and analysis before making a final decision on long-term management of the System.

      The following is a brief description of the alternatives analyzed in detail in the EA. Please refer to the EA, Chapters 2 and 3, for more information about each alternative.
      • Alternative A is the “no action” alternative that reflects the existing trail system with 2007 management and funding levels.
      • Alternative B is the “proposed action” that was released in June 2008 for public comment. It was developed to address the problems initially identified in trail condition surveys conducted in 2007-2008.
      • Alternative C closes the OHV System, but maintains over 10 miles of existing Forest system roads in the area, open year-round or seasonally, to provide for public highway-legal vehicle access for hunting, fishing and other recreation uses. It was developed in response to public concerns that the proposed action (Alternative B) did not go far enough in eliminating trails on sensitive soils and trails near water.
      • Alternative D was developed in response to public concerns that the OHV Trail System should meet current trail density and challenge level standards, and not require a Forest Plan amendment.
      • Alternative E was developed in response to public concerns that the proposed action (Alternative B) would eliminate too many high challenge OHV experiences.
      • Alternative F was developed in response to public concerns that the proposed action (Alternative B) would eliminate too many OHV trail miles.
      The environmental concerns that initiated the proposed management changes are described in the EA, as are the projected direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects of each of these Alternatives.

      The EA shows that the Upper Tellico OHV System has extensive damage and contributes unacceptable levels of sediment into the Tellico River and its tributaries. Sediment is leaving the OHV System from more than 2,000 locations along the trails. The Agency is in violation of North Carolina state water quality standards because of the conditions on Upper Tellico OHV System. Since the Upper Tellico River watershed is located in an area of steep terrain, highly erosive soils, and high rainfall, maintaining an OHV trail system without causing significant environmental damage is extremely difficult.

      While I understand how important the Upper Tellico OHV System is to OHV users, the impacts to water quality are so significant that I cannot recommend keeping the System open at this time. After careful consideration of the environmental effects of the alternatives as presented in the EA, my preferred alternative is Alternative C, which closes the OHV System. Alternative C would maintain over 10 miles of existing Forest system roads (currently also OHV trails), open year-round or seasonally, to provide public access for hunting, fishing and other recreation uses. Trail 1 (FS Road 420-1) would be paved and kept open as a through route for highway-legal vehicles.

      I want to emphasize that a final decision has not yet been made. This public review period is an opportunity for you to give us constructive feedback. I encourage you to review the environmental assessment and provide us with any information that you think we have not considered adequately. Your comments need to be as specific as possible and you must provide the following information: 1) Your name and address; 2) Title of the project; 3) Specific substantive comments on the proposed action, along with supporting reasons that I should consider in reaching a decision; and 4) Your signature or other means of identification verification. For organizations, a signature or other means of identification verification must be provided for the individual authorized to represent your organization.

      Comments must be postmarked or received within 30 days beginning the day after publication of this notice in The Asheville Citizen-Times. Comments may be mailed electronically, in a common digital format, to: comments-southern-north-carolina-nan...itee@fs.fed.us; or by regular mail to: National Forests in North Carolina, Attn: Candace Wyman, 160 A Zillicoa Street, Asheville, NC 28801, or faxed to 828-257-4263. Hand delivered comments must be received within our normal business hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
      Thank you for your continued interest in management of the National Forests in North Carolina and the Tusquitee Ranger District.

      Sincerely,


      Just saw this on another forum


      MARISUE HILLIARD
      Forest Supervisor
       
    2. Support EF

      Join the Elite Explorers for $20 for 2 years!

      Explorer Forum has probably saved you that much already, and will continue to save you money as you learn how to diagnose fix problems yourself, and learn which modifications work without having to experiment on your own. Elite Explorer members see practically no ads, can add their own profile photo, upload photo attachments directly to your posts and Media Gallery, create more private Conversations, and more. Join Today. Your support is greatly appreciated.


      to hide adverts.
    3. sn0border88

      sn0border88 Master Apprentice Elite Explorer

      Joined:
      June 27, 2005
      Messages:
      4,205
      Likes Received:
      2
      Trophy Points:
      0
      City, State:
      Souderton, PA
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      1992 XLT
      Figured id update this since its gotten so much attention :(

      Tellico is closed until March 31, 2011 or at the supervisors discretion. Personally, Id be surprised to see it reopen and if it does you can be sure it will never be the same.

      I really wish I would of had the chance to wheel there.
       
    4. Premier

      Premier Explorer Addict

      Joined:
      June 10, 2003
      Messages:
      5,252
      Likes Received:
      2
      Trophy Points:
      48
      City, State:
      Utah
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      96 sport
      that sucks.. its ok to bulldoze trees to build a shopping mall, but you cant wheel.. cuz it damages the environment
       
    5. Turdle

      Turdle I bake stuff Staff Member Moderator Elite Explorer

      Joined:
      June 16, 2003
      Messages:
      27,987
      Likes Received:
      305
      Trophy Points:
      113
      City, State:
      Humboldt, KS
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      2000 Mounty

    Share This Page







    We Support Our Troops!