Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Ranger Mazda Navajo Mercury Mountaineer Message Board
Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Ranger Mazda Navajo Mercury Mountaineer Message Board - For Enthusiasts by Enthusiasts


Ford Explorer Generation Guide

EF Swag Store 2013 Ford Explorer Forums Elite Membership Chat Room My Posts Reviews Explorer Photo Gallery
Go Back   Ford Explorer Ranger Enthusiasts "Serious Explorations"® > All Other Cars, Trucks, Motorcycles etc. > Hybrids, Electric, Hydrogen, Bio-diesel, E-85, Fuel Economy Discussion

Notices

Hybrids, Electric, Hydrogen, Bio-diesel, E-85, Fuel Economy Discussion This forum is for information and discussion of fuels for tomorrow and fuel economy tips for our current vehicles. Hybrids, Electric, Hydrogen, Bio-diesel, Natural Gas, Propane, E-85 which will become our next mainstream fuel?

HHO kit question.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-19-2012, 09:00 PM   #1
jmarreroi
Puerto Rico
2010 XLT
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 16

Vehicle Specs

(Original Poster)
Exclamation HHO kit question.

Hi Guys:
I know this question is here around on and on, but I'm looking for real answers; My 10' Ex is killing my pocket with 14.9 mpg, my question is, someone have install the hhokitsdirect.com in their ex? If so, do you have any gain in mpg?

Thanks for the info.
jmarreroi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2012, 09:19 PM   #2
BrooklynBay
Aerostar Forum Moderator
Brooklyn, NY
 
BrooklynBay's Avatar
88 89 93 95 96 Aerostars
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 45,810

Vehicle Specs

Your thread was moved into the hydrogen, hybrid, and fuel economy section.
BrooklynBay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 02:07 PM   #3
Jumpjets
New Bern, NC
2002 XLS
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 17

Vehicle Specs

I built one of those several years ago. It was a fun little project. It didn't increase my mileage though.

It did however, pump out fairly decent volume of EXTREMELY explosive colorless odorless gas. I was curious if it was a hoax or not, so I hooked mine up to to a 15 VDC electrical system and held a lighter up to it. The whole kit exploded. I was very lucky I wasn't hurt.

I ended up installing a wide band oxygen sensor in the car, and then I hooked up potentiometers to the stock narrow band o2 sensors. I dialed down the cruising air fuel ratio to about 17:1. It was pretty cool to get 36mpg in a 1994 5.7L V8 Camaro Z28.
Jumpjets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2012, 12:16 PM   #4
zpexploder
Kelseyville Ca
'05 XLT V8 2WD HHO & Volo
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42

Vehicle Specs

Hello. I have recently installed a dual dry cell HHO system from HydroclubUSA and a Volo chip in my 2005 4.6L V8 Explorer XLT. I have it injected into air intake right before butterfly. It is producing roughly 4 lpm at 30 amps per cell. I am astonished with performance and MPG increase. When I bought the truck in Jan. 2011, (before HHO) I drove it from Las Vegas to Ukiah Ca and the best MPG i got was 21 hwy. since I got home my average has been less than 18mpg. This last week (after HHO and Volo chip install) , I have seen MPG as high as 30.4 MPG on the HWY. In town I am getting an average of 23 mpg. Also, the truck runs beautifully. Lots of power when I need it and very quiet. Just thought Id let everyone know. Have a great day!
zpexploder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2012, 08:21 PM   #5
2000StreetRod
Elite Explorer
Greenville, SC
 
2000StreetRod's Avatar
2000 Sport SOHC 2WD
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,663

Vehicle Specs

HHO or Chip?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zpexploder View Post
Hello. I have recently installed a dual dry cell HHO system from HydroclubUSA and a Volo chip in my 2005 4.6L V8 Explorer XLT. I have it injected into air intake right before butterfly. It is producing roughly 4 lpm at 30 amps per cell. I am astonished with performance and MPG increase. When I bought the truck in Jan. 2011, (before HHO) I drove it from Las Vegas to Ukiah Ca and the best MPG i got was 21 hwy. since I got home my average has been less than 18mpg. This last week (after HHO and Volo chip install) , I have seen MPG as high as 30.4 MPG on the HWY. In town I am getting an average of 23 mpg. Also, the truck runs beautifully. Lots of power when I need it and very quiet. Just thought Id let everyone know. Have a great day!
Very interesting. Do you know if the improvement is due to the HHO or just the chip? My Bosch fuel injection manual states that best fuel economy occurs at lambda = 1.05 (15.4:1). This can be achieved with a custom tune, a chip that overwrites stored data tables, or an EFIE. I believe HHO users have learned that when the PCM is in closed loop the O2 sensors will negate any HHO gains unless one of the above is implemented. Have you driven the vehicle without HHO to see how much fuel savings it actually contributes? Unfortunately, when the A/F ratio exceeds 14.7:1 the nitrous oxide emissions rapidly increase due to the design of standard three way catalytic converters. Also, when the engine runs lean the combustion temperatures increase decreasing the life of cylinder valves. Fortunately, the 4.6L V8 has two knock sensors allowing the PCM to retard the ignition timing to prevent detonation.




__________________
My Helpful Threads, Registry, 16.4/23 mpg, 3900 lbs, 5R55E, 3.73:1, 175 rwhp, Henson custom tune, CAI, Spectre air filter, Lightning 90mm MAF, 75mm throttle body, A/F ratio meter, synthetic oils, Accusump, 2 row radiator, 3+1 leaf springs, .75 inch drop, Edelbrock IAS lowering shocks, engine oil & ATF temp gauge & remote filters & coolers, remote crank
2000StreetRod is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 12:37 PM   #6
zpexploder
Kelseyville Ca
'05 XLT V8 2WD HHO & Volo
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42

Vehicle Specs

Have not tried that yet.

2000streetrod, thats a good question. I have not yet powerd off HHO cells and ran solely on the Volo chip. I will have to reset chip and run it for a few days without HHO to see. I will also power down the chip and run solely on HHO for a day or two for comparison. I have noticed the truck running leaner just by the throttle response. Feels to be pulling more air when throttle is depressed. I am assuming that is the Volo chip patching the ecu. I will run the chip test as soon as I can and post the results.
zpexploder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 02:04 AM   #7
fr0st m0nkey
Stockton, CA
'04 XLT
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 125

Vehicle Specs

Bump. Everything still working properly?
fr0st m0nkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 06:12 PM   #8
zpexploder
Kelseyville Ca
'05 XLT V8 2WD HHO & Volo
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42

Vehicle Specs

Exclamation HHO gains

So, I had a small problem. One of the HHO dry cells o-rings popped out causing a water leak. I disconnected it and ran on one for a couple weeks. actual gains with one unit and all types of driving (hwy, city and scenic drives) were about 17 mpg (16.987) I have repaired the second unit and it is back on.

I know the Volo chip is working but not to the level i expect. It works on leaning out the engine but not much on throttle voltages. I have a map sensor enhancer i built and will install it on MAF this weekend for some tests.

I am also building a computerized map sensor enhancer using an Arduino UNO, a hydrogen sensor and a digital to analog voltage chip.

I am going to install the sensors and arduino to collect the data from MAF, ammeter voltage and Hydrogen sensor for a week or so on a laptop in the cabin. Once I have compiled the data, I can write a code for the arduino chip for ultimate gains. It will control voltage (1-5 volts) to cpu from MAF using the information from hydrogen sensor and ammeter readings. (higher amps means more HHO)

Ill keep you guys posted.
zpexploder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 06:38 PM   #9
2000StreetRod
Elite Explorer
Greenville, SC
 
2000StreetRod's Avatar
2000 Sport SOHC 2WD
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,663

Vehicle Specs

MAFAmp

I designed and built a MAF sensor amplifier (MAFAmp). I was able to adjust the MAFAmp gain in real time via a potentiometer mounted on my A pillar pod. What I quickly learned is that it only affected the A/F ratio when the PCM was in open loop or in closed loop when the fuel trim limits were exceeded. That's when I concluded that an EFIE or a custom tune was the best approach.




__________________
My Helpful Threads, Registry, 16.4/23 mpg, 3900 lbs, 5R55E, 3.73:1, 175 rwhp, Henson custom tune, CAI, Spectre air filter, Lightning 90mm MAF, 75mm throttle body, A/F ratio meter, synthetic oils, Accusump, 2 row radiator, 3+1 leaf springs, .75 inch drop, Edelbrock IAS lowering shocks, engine oil & ATF temp gauge & remote filters & coolers, remote crank
2000StreetRod is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 04:09 PM   #10
dzychek
Bridgeport, CT
2000 XLT
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3

Vehicle Specs

Volo chip installed, HHO cells on the way. I installed the chip first to see what difference it would make. Not much! I'm getting about 16MPG with just the chip. HHos will be installed next, just trying to mount them behind the front bumper. There's not a lot of extra room under the hood. I'll keep you posted.
dzychek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 06:04 PM   #11
FIND
Likes Math!
Vermillion, SD
 
FIND's Avatar
99 XLT V8 AWD
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,881

Vehicle Specs

Why are you only getting 16mpg?




__________________
I strongly abide by the motto, "Safety third."

Quote:
Originally Posted by NICE59FORDF100 View Post
Dont forget numbers. Teacher Ladies LOVE numbers
FIND is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Suggest this thread to friends:

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HHO: Is it alchemy? Or will it improve gas mileage on a ’99 4.0 SOHC Explorer? aldive Hybrids, Electric, Hydrogen, Bio-diesel, E-85, Fuel Economy Discussion 888 10-11-2012 02:04 PM
00M12 kit question lacton Stock 1995 - 2001 Explorers 0 08-24-2010 01:13 PM
Not the average lift kit question tweakedlogic Modified 1991-1994 Explorers 12 03-10-2009 09:26 PM
HELP PLEASE leveling kit Question hardyboy52 2001-2005 Explorer Sport Trac 0 07-19-2008 11:32 PM
Question about lift kit and tire size for 94' 4WD Explorer robmurt04 Modified 1991-1994 Explorers 1 01-13-2007 09:00 AM



Join the "Elite Explorers" Today!



Search Explorer Forum


Top of Page

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 AM.



US Flag
We Support Our Troops!

Explore the site!


Copyright 2013 - 1996 Rick Horwitz Photography



This site is not endorsed or affiliated

with the Ford Motor Company in any way.



All tips on this site are for use at your own risk and discretion.

Modifying the suspension on any vehicle will cause changes to its handling characteristics.



Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.