91Chinook
Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2015
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- West Coast
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1991 Aerostar
My aerostar went down hard, water in oil, after coolant loss. The engine is out now, replacement heads due any day. The engine history, prior to losing the heads, is 55K on a Ford dealership longblock. The block deck is flat, so the the engine should have considerable life; we plan to fix the heads and put it back in, with existing pistons, cam and bearings
Reading the posts here, I thought to replace the pushrods, in the belief that the upper end is poorly lubricated and prone to wear. On a quick inspection of several, I don't see obvious wear, but I do see the pushrods are solid, not the hollow oil-movers i've worked with on GM and Chrysler engines.
I'm interested in pushrod input, but more important and expensive is the hydraulic roller lifters.
My mechanic wants to replace all 12 lifters, which run $20-50 each. I figure the Ford longblock lifters are better quality than the lower priced lifters, and ought to be worth cleaning up, or at least disassembling to inspect for water damage and carbon.
The pushrod Ford buff at Autozone showed me cutaway pics of hidden inner-wall chambers in this vintage lifter that are impossible to decarbonize, leading to a high risk of soaking it loose in a way that will fail the lifter after the engine is run. So his thought is either replace them without decarbonizing, or bite the bullet and replace them.
What's the lifter-wisdom here? I just watched a convincing (I know, right?) Youtube recondition job on 91-94 4.0L Ford lifters. So there does seem to be uncertainty on the clean or replace question.
I should mention that this is a rare unit, a Chinook pop-top camper van That's why I bought it, and why I would consider the cost of parts and mechanic to revive a 91 Aerostar. You can see exterior pics at this thread:
http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=431061
Reading the posts here, I thought to replace the pushrods, in the belief that the upper end is poorly lubricated and prone to wear. On a quick inspection of several, I don't see obvious wear, but I do see the pushrods are solid, not the hollow oil-movers i've worked with on GM and Chrysler engines.
I'm interested in pushrod input, but more important and expensive is the hydraulic roller lifters.
My mechanic wants to replace all 12 lifters, which run $20-50 each. I figure the Ford longblock lifters are better quality than the lower priced lifters, and ought to be worth cleaning up, or at least disassembling to inspect for water damage and carbon.
The pushrod Ford buff at Autozone showed me cutaway pics of hidden inner-wall chambers in this vintage lifter that are impossible to decarbonize, leading to a high risk of soaking it loose in a way that will fail the lifter after the engine is run. So his thought is either replace them without decarbonizing, or bite the bullet and replace them.
What's the lifter-wisdom here? I just watched a convincing (I know, right?) Youtube recondition job on 91-94 4.0L Ford lifters. So there does seem to be uncertainty on the clean or replace question.
I should mention that this is a rare unit, a Chinook pop-top camper van That's why I bought it, and why I would consider the cost of parts and mechanic to revive a 91 Aerostar. You can see exterior pics at this thread:
http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=431061