Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Ranger Mazda Navajo Mercury Mountaineer Message Board
Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Ranger Mazda Navajo Mercury Mountaineer Message Board - For Enthusiasts by Enthusiasts


Ford Explorer Generation Guide

2013 Ford Explorer Forums Elite Membership Chat Room My Posts Reviews Explorer Photo Gallery
Go Back   Ford Explorer Ranger Enthusiasts "Serious Explorations"® > Ford Explorer Ranger Repair - Troubleshooting - Modifications & Detailing Forums > 2002 - 2005 Explorer Mountaineer 3rd Generation > Modified 2002 - 2005 Explorers

Notices

Modified 2002 - 2005 Explorers Questions related to modified 2002 - 2005 Explorers and Mountaineers. For Sport Trac and Sport models use the 1995-2001 forum. Aftermarket accessories and modifications. Bullbar, running boards, floor mats, cargo mat, DVD headrest, wheels, tires, stereo upgrade, headlights, mud flaps, lift kits, engine swap, transmission swap.

Oversized balljoints?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-18-2012, 01:12 AM   #1
fr0st m0nkey
Stockton, CA
'04 XLT
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 125

Vehicle Specs

(Original Poster)
Oversized balljoints?

Just saw on RockAuto that they make "oversized ball joints" and ball joints specifically for the explorers that came with 17" wheels. Would either of those be better than stock for use with a 1.75/front 1.5/rear coil spacer lift?
fr0st m0nkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 05:27 AM   #2
Ronin8002
Elite Explorer
Virginia
2008 XLT Ironman
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,872

Vehicle Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by fr0st m0nkey View Post
Just saw on RockAuto that they make "oversized ball joints" and ball joints specifically for the explorers that came with 17" wheels. Would either of those be better than stock for use with a 1.75/front 1.5/rear coil spacer lift?
Just looked at those...looks like both Moog and Mevotech make them. At that price it can't hurt, as long as they fit your control arms.




__________________
Mods: 265/70/17 Mickey Thompson Baja STZ on 17x8 Black Rock Viper 900B wheels, Bentley style grille, Raptor style LED grille lights, Pacer performance clearance lights, 30" 180W LED light bar behind grille, BTF upper control arms, Fox 2.0 5" travel emulsion coilover shocks in front/rear Truxx spacers, 1" body lift, front skidplate under radiator, recovery shackle mounts
My Rig:http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/...47#post3004247
Ronin8002 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 08:00 AM   #3
duner
Oklahoma
03 Explorer Limited
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 71

Vehicle Specs

Beefier balljoints will not solve the problem. The upper control arm is the problem. Go back and look at the picture of the failure and notice that the balljoint is still intact and the upper control arm is ripped out. The angle of the balljoint after installing the spacers increases so much that it "bottoms out" against the side of itself and rips it out of the control arm. You could have the strongest balljoint in the world and it would still do the same thing. The only true fix would be to get the BTF upper control arms. They are longer to get the camber adjustment back and the angle of the balljoint mount is corrected to match the new angle so the balljoint doesnt bottom out on itself. They are also beeefier around the balljoint. This is the only way to fix the problem.
I just dont want people thinking they can put new ball joints in a add the spacers and they will be good to go and they ride will be safe because its wont be. The control arm where the balljoint mounts is the weak link.

If someone can post the picture I mentioned above they can see where the problem really is. This will be the same case in any of the failures. I have never seen a balljoint come apart or fail in that way only get loose and floppy.

Also want to mention the wheel spacers that everyone uses add sooo much more leverage(more than you can imagine) to the upper balljoints and contributes to this problem in a big way also as well as the added stress to the rest of the parts.

Just my 2 cents.




__________________
2003 Ford Explorer Limited 10.5" total lift, Custom 8" suspension lift (45" from top of fender to ground on front and 43" in rear), Custom upper control arms front and rear, 18x9 Fuel Boost -12os 4.50 bs wheels, 295/70/18 (34.5")Nitto Grapplers.
duner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 05:19 PM   #4
fr0st m0nkey
Stockton, CA
'04 XLT
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 125

Vehicle Specs

(Original Poster)
Quote:
Originally Posted by duner View Post
Beefier balljoints will not solve the problem. The upper control arm is the problem. Go back and look at the picture of the failure and notice that the balljoint is still intact and the upper control arm is ripped out. The angle of the balljoint after installing the spacers increases so much that it "bottoms out" against the side of itself and rips it out of the control arm. You could have the strongest balljoint in the world and it would still do the same thing. The only true fix would be to get the BTF upper control arms. They are longer to get the camber adjustment back and the angle of the balljoint mount is corrected to match the new angle so the balljoint doesnt bottom out on itself. They are also beeefier around the balljoint. This is the only way to fix the problem.
I just dont want people thinking they can put new ball joints in a add the spacers and they will be good to go and they ride will be safe because its wont be. The control arm where the balljoint mounts is the weak link.

If someone can post the picture I mentioned above they can see where the problem really is. This will be the same case in any of the failures. I have never seen a balljoint come apart or fail in that way only get loose and floppy.

Also want to mention the wheel spacers that everyone uses add sooo much more leverage(more than you can imagine) to the upper balljoints and contributes to this problem in a big way also as well as the added stress to the rest of the parts.

Just my 2 cents.
Post up the CAD files for your drop down brackets so I can avoid having to buy BTF's control arms!

Would beefing up the stock control arms and adding 'oversized' balljoints help? I just did some googling for stuff about strengthening stock control arms and it looks like it's been done. You seem to know a lot about this stuff, drop some more knowledge on us.

Also, I developed some 1.75 front/1.5 rear coil spacers in Solidworks 2012 that I'll post up here if anyone wants to make their own.
fr0st m0nkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 05:32 PM   #5
Kazer
Elite Explorer
Saginaw, MI
 
Kazer's Avatar
2002 4.0 FX4
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,653

Vehicle Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by duner View Post
Beefier balljoints will not solve the problem. The upper control arm is the problem. Go back and look at the picture of the failure and notice that the balljoint is still intact and the upper control arm is ripped out. The angle of the balljoint after installing the spacers increases so much that it "bottoms out" against the side of itself and rips it out of the control arm. You could have the strongest balljoint in the world and it would still do the same thing. The only true fix would be to get the BTF upper control arms. They are longer to get the camber adjustment back and the angle of the balljoint mount is corrected to match the new angle so the balljoint doesnt bottom out on itself. They are also beeefier around the balljoint. This is the only way to fix the problem.
I just dont want people thinking they can put new ball joints in a add the spacers and they will be good to go and they ride will be safe because its wont be. The control arm where the balljoint mounts is the weak link.

If someone can post the picture I mentioned above they can see where the problem really is. This will be the same case in any of the failures. I have never seen a balljoint come apart or fail in that way only get loose and floppy.

Also want to mention the wheel spacers that everyone uses add sooo much more leverage(more than you can imagine) to the upper balljoints and contributes to this problem in a big way also as well as the added stress to the rest of the parts.

Just my 2 cents.
this one?


the guy was running a 3" coil spacer and a 2" wheel spacer




__________________
-Steve-
Mustang GT's 17x8 +24 Offset, 245/65r17 Hankook Dynapro ATM RF10
BTF 2.25" front, 1.75" rear, 1.5" bodylift, Spartan Locker
The Mounds
2002-2005 Explorer Facebook Page
Kazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 10:12 AM   #6
duner
Oklahoma
03 Explorer Limited
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 71

Vehicle Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by fr0st m0nkey View Post
Post up the CAD files for your drop down brackets so I can avoid having to buy BTF's control arms!

Would beefing up the stock control arms and adding 'oversized' balljoints help? I just did some googling for stuff about strengthening stock control arms and it looks like it's been done. You seem to know a lot about this stuff, drop some more knowledge on us.

Also, I developed some 1.75 front/1.5 rear coil spacers in Solidworks 2012 that I'll post up here if anyone wants to make their own.
Not going to post the CADD files of the brackets of. I have months of hardwork creating them.


Yes, Beefing up the control arms would help but there are not many ways to do it. If you have all of the tools build you a set....




__________________
2003 Ford Explorer Limited 10.5" total lift, Custom 8" suspension lift (45" from top of fender to ground on front and 43" in rear), Custom upper control arms front and rear, 18x9 Fuel Boost -12os 4.50 bs wheels, 295/70/18 (34.5")Nitto Grapplers.
duner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 12:24 PM   #7
fr0st m0nkey
Stockton, CA
'04 XLT
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 125

Vehicle Specs

(Original Poster)
Quote:
Originally Posted by duner View Post
Not going to post the CADD files of the brackets of. I have months of hardwork creating them.


Yes, Beefing up the control arms would help but there are not many ways to do it. If you have all of the tools build you a set....
Shucks

I've got a full ag engineering shop at my disposal this quarter for a fabrication class I'm taking, I'm sure one of the professors will know how to strengthen them. Spacers and a body lift it is.

I uploaded the spacers I made to grabcad if anyone wants to check them out or make their own.
http://grabcad.com/library/third-gen...r-coil-spacers

Last edited by fr0st m0nkey; 01-24-2012 at 12:36 PM.
fr0st m0nkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2012, 08:46 AM   #8
duner
Oklahoma
03 Explorer Limited
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 71

Vehicle Specs

Not sure if I am going to have time to finish getting this stuff into production I have been really busy with work and other stuff lately and had to put this on the back burner.

I may be willing to sell all of the details and CAD and DXF files to someone for $5500 who may want to take it the rest of the way. I have everything deatail in AutoCad for all of the parts and materials. I also have Nested DXF files for the Laser cutout of all of the flat peices. Enough to be able to send them to a vendor to have made.




__________________
2003 Ford Explorer Limited 10.5" total lift, Custom 8" suspension lift (45" from top of fender to ground on front and 43" in rear), Custom upper control arms front and rear, 18x9 Fuel Boost -12os 4.50 bs wheels, 295/70/18 (34.5")Nitto Grapplers.
duner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Suggest this thread to friends:

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
oversized front license plate bracket KRN Stock 2011 - 2014 Ford Explorer Discussion 5 06-01-2011 02:43 PM
Balljoints round 2. Blacksheep Josh Stock 1991 - 1994 Explorers 24 05-06-2008 04:52 PM
1st Gen balljoints (pics) fulfilledstraw Stock 1991 - 1994 Explorers 0 01-06-2008 09:56 PM
Wrong Balljoints kpgli84 Under the Hood 8 10-27-2004 10:32 AM



Join the "Elite Explorers" Today!



Search Explorer Forum


Top of Page

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:18 PM.



US Flag
We Support Our Troops!

Explore the site!


Copyright 2013 - 1996 Rick Horwitz Photography



This site is not endorsed or affiliated

with the Ford Motor Company in any way.



All tips on this site are for use at your own risk and discretion.

Modifying the suspension on any vehicle will cause changes to its handling characteristics.



Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.