Serious Explorations Ford Explorer and Ranger Message Board
#1 Resource for Ford Explorer and Ranger Owners - By Enthusiasts, for Enthusiasts.


Ford Explorer Generation Guide

EF Swag Store 2016 Ford Explorer Forums Elite Membership Chat Room My Posts Reviews Explorer Photo Gallery
Go Back   Ford Explorer and Ranger Forums "Serious Explorations" > Ford Explorer Ranger Repair - Troubleshooting - Modifications & Detailing Forums > Under the Hood

Notices

Under the Hood Ford Explorer and Ranger, Engine, troubleshooting, modifications, performance and accessories.

The difference between 4.0L OHV and SOHC

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-04-2003, 05:35 PM   #1
97LTD
Concord, CA
'97 and '98 LTD
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 98

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
(Original Poster)
The difference between 4.0L OHV and SOHC

Hi Folks,

I'm wondering if anyone knows of the difference between OHV and SOHC in 4.0 L engine. Which are better and why?... I have 1993 LTD with OHV and 97 with SOHC engine. I assumed they both are little different since SOHC are equipped with chains.

Any opinions or feedbacks are welcome!
97LTD is offline   Reply With Quote
( Join the Elite Explorers )

Join the Elite Explorers for only $20 a year. Explorer Forum has probably saved you that much already, and will continue to save you money as you learn how to diagnose and fix problems yourself, and learn which modifications really work without having to experiment on your own. Elite Explorer members can change the forum "styles" to eliminate most ads, including blue underlined links, and no ads on photos. Other benefits include the ability to store 1000 Private Messages, upload photo attachments directly to your posts and to our Photo Gallery and more. Join the Elite Explorers today.


Old 09-04-2003, 05:50 PM   #2
Billy177
Redding CT
99 Explorer XLT SOHC 4x4
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,902

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
sohc has overhead cams the ohv is a poshrod engine the sohc has more power however the ohv may prove to be more reliable




__________________
1999 4.0 Sohc XLT 4x4 3.55 31' BFG MT
Mac Air Intake, High-Flow cats, Excalibrator
Flowmaster 50 Series Cat-back,Rancho 5000's,
TT + Shackles, 200 Amp Alternator,
Autometer Gauges, 150 Watt Lights
Detroit Locker in Rear
Billy177 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2003, 05:50 PM   #3
Magicfan25
Central FL and WPB Florida
98 Sport SOHC
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 881

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
the SOHC is just that, single over head cam..the other 4.0 is a pushrod engine. SOHC has higher compression but also makes in the area of 50extra hp and more torque too. The 97 SOHCs had alot of problems with the timing chain tensioners...not sure if Ford will ever get this fixed on any of the pre 00 engines.




__________________
98 Explorer Sport 2WHD 4.0SOHCV6
Pioneer DEH 8400 MP, JL 500/1,
JL 12W3 (x2) Custom built downfiring box.
Magicfan25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2003, 06:07 PM   #4
wired_af
Wichita, KS
'98 Sport
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,347

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
the sohc has top end power. the ohv has bottom end power

while the sohc makes more HP, the sohc and ohv make a real close amount of torque

read the blue quote in my sig......




__________________
Alex | '98 Explorer Sport 4.0L OHV 4x4
32's with 4" of lift.
Eclipse head unit and amps. Seas mids and LPG tweets.

Last edited by wired_af; 09-04-2003 at 07:10 PM.
wired_af is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2003, 06:42 PM   #5
Nate1
All 4 wheels locked
Gainesville/Tampa, FL
 
Nate1's Avatar
'96 FZJ-80
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,053

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Not exactly.
A SOHC vs a OHV will win. SOHCs produce more power at a cost. They are a pain to maintain, and you may have to revv higher to make that power. Engine maintnence for pre-00 owners can be a real headache, and we often wonder why we getter lower milage than the V8 guys, but if you have to spool up your engine to make that extra umph... you will guzzle more gas.

I like my sohc.... I had a pushrod and it feldt like a dog.... but then again it had no mods.




__________________
1996 Lexyota FZJ-80, locked center/rear/front, 33" Revos, 3" OME Suspension lift, etc.
[photos...]

the lexus
Nate1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2003, 07:09 PM   #6
wired_af
Wichita, KS
'98 Sport
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,347

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i wasnt saying any of the engines would win in a race.

sohc makes 250lbs and ohv makes 220lbs.......

ive heard people racing the ohv and sohc

they say the ohv and sohc are neck and neck until 3000rmp where the sohc uses its top end




__________________
Alex | '98 Explorer Sport 4.0L OHV 4x4
32's with 4" of lift.
Eclipse head unit and amps. Seas mids and LPG tweets.
wired_af is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2003, 08:47 PM   #7
dogfriend
Human-Animal Hybrid
Carmichael, CA
 
dogfriend's Avatar
'97 Sport 4x4
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,737

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
In general, a SOHC engine will be more efficient at higher engine speeds than a pushrod engine of the same size. A SOHC has less mass in the valve train than a pushrod engine of the same size, therefore the valves can move faster and the engine can rev higher.

Differences between SOHC, DOHC and Pushrod Valve Train

For the Explorer engines, the 4.0 OHV (pushrod) is an old engine design and has all of the kinks worked out over time. This engine was originally based on a German 2.8 L design which was used in the V6 Ranger (1983), then increased to 2.9 L for the Ranger and Bronco II(1986?), then increased to the 4.0 L for the Ranger and Explorer (1990-91).

The 4.0 SOHC was introduced in 1997 and has had some issues with the oil pump, the timing chain tensioners and the intake manifold o-rings. However, it is much better suited to motivating a 4200+ vehicle than the OHV engine. I would expect that most of the design issues have been worked out in the latest versions.
dogfriend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2003, 10:14 PM   #8
bluestream
Waterloo, Ontario
2000 XLT 4X4 SOHC
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 81

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have both a SOHC and an OHV Explorer. I much prefer the OHV due to the fact that the engine produces it's torque at very low RPM. This is ideal for an off road vehicle, and well suited to a manual transmission. The SOHC drives much like a Japanese vehicle with the power produced at a higher RMP. This contributes to the poor fuel economy of the SOHC engine.

MY 2000 XLT has valve train rattle noise at 2400 to 2600 RPM. The noise defect is due to the fact that the valve timing design on these engines is basicly a POS. Ford has washed their hands of all these vehicles that are out of warranty, and their owners are SOL. I feel that if there is a defect, they should repair all the vehicles they have produced not just the ones with warranty left. I have lost a lot of respect for Ford due to the way they have treated me with this vehicle. I doubt that I could ever buy a Ford again. .




__________________
2000 XLT 4X4 4.0L SOHC 4.10's
1991 XLT 4X4 4.0L OHV 5 Speed 3.55
2001 GRAND AM SE 5 Speed
1991 BMW 735 IL
bluestream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2003, 02:02 AM   #9
yob_yeknom
Moderator Emeritus
Glade Hill, Virginia
 
yob_yeknom's Avatar
'97 XLT & '06 Limited
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,482

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Sorry to disappoint you guys, but the SOHC engine makes its torque at the same speed as the OHV.

OHV - 220 @ 3000rpm

SOHC - 240 @ 3000rpm




__________________
~ My Mugshot
1997 XLT and 2006 Limited
Try not. Do. Or do not. There is no try. ~ Jedi Master Yoda
yob_yeknom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2003, 02:15 AM   #10
97LTD
Concord, CA
'97 and '98 LTD
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 98

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
(Original Poster)
Thanks for the information.. I do understand clearly the differences. On what the information I read is most preferred SOHC engines. I still have the '93 Ltd with OHV engine that has 202,000 miles on it and it still all orginal engine and still running. I do have some questions about the SOHC engines in my '97 LTD and what to look for in a check up and making sure it is working properly. The OHV engines are less maintenance than SOHC that have to be checked periodically for chain and tensioners as what I heard that Fords having problem with the pre '00 SOHC engines. Does the owner have to check the SOHC engine or have the shop to do the job?

Does anyone have any experience with any problems with SOHC engines? I wonder is OHV (pushrod) stronger than SOHC?

I wonder why Ford has not made recall regarding the SOHC problems and that they fixed it on the post '00 engines? Did the Ford instead extended the warranty or what?

Sorry too many ??'s Just some infomation that I'm doing research on engines and Explorers. G'day
97LTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2003, 10:06 PM   #11
MONMIX
I fix dents
Millersville , Maryland
 
MONMIX's Avatar
2000 Explorer Sport
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,882

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Dogfriend, you are a wealth of information.
We gotta do lunch one day.
Meet half way, say, Omaha ?




__________________
MONMIX
ASE certified Master Collision Repair Technician
I-CAR Certified Platinum Structural Technician
Live your life for a change
My Explorer
MONMIX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2003, 10:35 PM   #12
fordkrazy
Plantation FL
96 xlt 4x2
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 567

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
the reason you have 200k+ mi on your 93 is why i like the OHV ...i think ford still has some kinks in the sohc they need to look at...its true test will be with the 3rd gen's since i assume they are heavier..

hey nweibley....could you check out my post
http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/...threadid=87437

i need a floridian's input




__________________
Robert...."the whistle got woooooooo".....from the great mind of bubb rubb
'96 xlt loaded, droped 3", Flowmaster 2chamber,Custom www.protorque.com Converter,
BBK headers, monroe reflex (stock on back, 17" ext length on front
fordkrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2003, 12:32 AM   #13
dogfriend
Human-Animal Hybrid
Carmichael, CA
 
dogfriend's Avatar
'97 Sport 4x4
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,737

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by MONMIX
Dogfriend, you are a wealth of information.
We gotta do lunch one day.
Meet half way, say, Omaha ?
My OHV engine could make it to Omaha, but I'm not too sure the 5R55E transmission will make it that far.

My GF and I are planning a trip to Cancun just before Xmas....If you want to meet there, I'll buy the first round
dogfriend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2003, 01:56 AM   #14
fordkrazy
Plantation FL
96 xlt 4x2
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 567

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
uhmmmm....(clear throat)....i believe you have the 4r55e as the 5r55e is for the sohc




__________________
Robert...."the whistle got woooooooo".....from the great mind of bubb rubb
'96 xlt loaded, droped 3", Flowmaster 2chamber,Custom www.protorque.com Converter,
BBK headers, monroe reflex (stock on back, 17" ext length on front
fordkrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2003, 10:57 AM   #15
dogfriend
Human-Animal Hybrid
Carmichael, CA
 
dogfriend's Avatar
'97 Sport 4x4
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,737

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by fordkrazy
uhmmmm....(clear throat)....i believe you have the 4r55e as the 5r55e is for the sohc
Nope, all 97's with either 4.0 Engine (OHV or SOHC) have the 5R55E.
dogfriend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2003, 01:20 PM   #16
bluestream
Waterloo, Ontario
2000 XLT 4X4 SOHC
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 81

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by yob_yeknom
Sorry to disappoint you guys, but the SOHC engine makes its torque at the same speed as the OHV.

OHV - 220 @ 3000rpm

SOHC - 240 @ 3000rpm
Not so...specifications for 2000 model year are OHV 225 Lbs./ft @2750 rpm....OHC 240 Lbs./ft@3250RPM

1991 model year had 225Lbs./ft @ 2400 rpm if my memory is correct.




__________________
2000 XLT 4X4 4.0L SOHC 4.10's
1991 XLT 4X4 4.0L OHV 5 Speed 3.55
2001 GRAND AM SE 5 Speed
1991 BMW 735 IL
bluestream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2003, 08:22 PM   #17
fordkrazy
Plantation FL
96 xlt 4x2
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 567

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by dogfriend
Nope, all 97's with either 4.0 Engine (OHV or SOHC) have the 5R55E.

sorry...my mistake..i just looked at my haynes manual and you are right.




__________________
Robert...."the whistle got woooooooo".....from the great mind of bubb rubb
'96 xlt loaded, droped 3", Flowmaster 2chamber,Custom www.protorque.com Converter,
BBK headers, monroe reflex (stock on back, 17" ext length on front
fordkrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2003, 02:12 AM   #18
yob_yeknom
Moderator Emeritus
Glade Hill, Virginia
 
yob_yeknom's Avatar
'97 XLT & '06 Limited
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,482

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by bluestream
Not so...specifications for 2000 model year are OHV 225 Lbs./ft @2750 rpm....OHC 240 Lbs./ft@3250RPM

1991 model year had 225Lbs./ft @ 2400 rpm if my memory is correct.
My information shows the OHV had 220 @ 3000rpm for every year it was available.

I looked further and it shows 240 @ 3000rpm on the '97-99 SOHCs and 254 @ 3700rpm for the '00+

I wonder why we are finding different numbers?

Nevertheless, it's still all made at relatively low rpms.




__________________
~ My Mugshot
1997 XLT and 2006 Limited
Try not. Do. Or do not. There is no try. ~ Jedi Master Yoda
yob_yeknom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2003, 01:49 PM   #19
superman5787
Nashville,GA
'97 Taurus GL
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 73

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The 91 makes 220lb-ft at 2400rpm and only 155hp at 4200rpm. The 93 made 225lb-ft and 160hp at the same rpm as the 91's.




__________________
Old - Blue '91 XLT (All Go and no Show)
New - Gold '97 Taurus GL (Go, Show, and A/C!!)
superman5787 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003, 05:00 AM   #20
97LTD
Concord, CA
'97 and '98 LTD
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 98

Vehicle Specs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
(Original Poster)
Okay Guys... I have one question... Which is more expensive in repair or replace... OHV, SOHC engines.
I recently made a curious inquiry at different shops for OHV engines for factory rebuilt engine would run $3,000 to $4,000. I havent inquire about SOHC how much cost on that engine.

It appears that OHV is more reliable and last longer than SOHC since my 1993 with OHV has 203,000 miles and not one engine trouble. The idle is still smooth, no rough idle. I've taken good care of it and it lasts.
97LTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Suggest this thread to friends:



Join the "Elite Explorers" Today!



Search Explorer Forum


Top of Page

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.



US Flag
We Support Our Troops!

Explore the site!


Copyright 2014 - 1996 Rick Horwitz Photography



Ford Motor Company is not involved in the management of this site in any way.



All tips on this site are for use at your own risk and discretion.

Modifying the suspension on any vehicle will cause changes to its handling characteristics.



Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.