1992explorerMi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- June 15, 2015
- Messages
- 199
- Reaction score
- 7
- City, State
- Livingston County Michigan
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1992 Ford Explorer Sport
Don't waste your $ on this. In the Explorer/Ranger application it does not benefit at all from what Centerforce claims. Because of the design it doesn't use the centrifugal weight system, & also because of the design can not use the Patented Ball Bearing Pressure Plate. It uses a nice machined & painted stock PP. It looks pretty though. I ran one.centerforce dual friction
Don't waste your $ on this. In the Explorer/Ranger application it does not benefit at all from what Centerforce claims. Because of the design it doesn't use the centrifugal weight system, & also because of the design can not use the Patented Ball Bearing Pressure Plate. It uses a nice machined & painted stock PP. It looks pretty though. I ran one.
I love the Center Force in my explorer, mostly because of the pedal feels much stiffer. Just put a Luk clutch and flywheel in the Ranger I just bought, seems to be a great OE replacement, the pedal is a lot softer then I'm used to though.
I got mine at Napa, they are Luk products rebranded for Napa. They had the best price I could find for the Luk parts.
Don't waste your $ on this. In the Explorer/Ranger application it does not benefit at all from what Centerforce claims. Because of the design it doesn't use the centrifugal weight system, & also because of the design can not use the Patented Ball Bearing Pressure Plate. It uses a nice machined & painted stock PP. It looks pretty though. I ran one.