- Joined
- July 18, 1999
- Messages
- 8,839
- Reaction score
- 1
- City, State
- Annapolis, MD
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- '97 Limited
Published: February 26, 2001
By: Robert Lane
"People started to question Ford's commitment to quality, Ford's capability in quality, Ford's competence in quality." Bedi Gurminder, Ford vice president.
Ford started to manufacture the 2002 Explorer last year and planned to introduce them in late 2000 as well; however, after manufacturing more than 15,000 of them, they sat at the St. Louis and Louisville assembly plant's storage areas. Last week, Ford issued a ship order for certain 2002 Explorers. Michael Ward of Salomon Smith Barney said that Ford has lost "hundreds of millions" of dollars because of the 2002 Explorer's delayed launch.
Ford insists that the delayed launch of the 2002 Explorer shouldn't sound an alarm bell for consumers - but the fact the media was denied access to both Explorer assembly plants should. Ford wouldn't want the media snooping around now, would they?
Ford has been mum on explaining why thousands of Explorers couldn't be shipped to dealers, but the people who assemble the Explorer told BlueOvalNews that some 2002 models have already been repaired up to five times to correct various defects - some so serious that Ford couldn't possibly ship them even if they wanted to. An employee at an Explorer plant told BlueOvalNews that they have been working massive overtime and weekends to
repair the 2002 Explorers so Ford can start shipping them. An estimated 75,000 are already presold. Here's a brief list of what's alleged to have been repaired before Ford issued the ship order on CERTAIN models:
1) Defective rear axle spindle nuts on first 8,000+ units were coming loose during test drives (see above photo).
2) The accelerator cables on some models were too long causing accelerator pedals to stick.
3) Ignition switches were popping out of the steering column when in the ACC position.
4) Luggage racks coming loose due to defective securing screws.
The above four issues are said to be vender/supplier issues and should not reflect on the engineering or build quality of the 2002 Explorer. Maybe. On the same token, Ford should take a cue and learn how to stop squeezing the life out of their suppliers to begin with, to insure quality products.
Ford's P.R. department, who is unarguably the best in the business, are releasing the usual "We want to make sure it's perfect," Blah Blah Blah rhetoric to insure the public that NO 2002 Explorer will ship before it's absolutely ripe. Sure, whatever. It's hard to ship a vehicle when the rear wheels allegedly fall off, isn't it? After all, these are production vehicles, the ones that consumers actually purchase.
What does Jac Jacques Nasser have to say about all of this? "If you look at our launch performance, I am totally (ticked) off with it." That's a great quote coming from the man who is single handedly purging Ford's best engineers and returning Ford back to the darkest days of product quality.
By: Robert Lane
"People started to question Ford's commitment to quality, Ford's capability in quality, Ford's competence in quality." Bedi Gurminder, Ford vice president.
Ford started to manufacture the 2002 Explorer last year and planned to introduce them in late 2000 as well; however, after manufacturing more than 15,000 of them, they sat at the St. Louis and Louisville assembly plant's storage areas. Last week, Ford issued a ship order for certain 2002 Explorers. Michael Ward of Salomon Smith Barney said that Ford has lost "hundreds of millions" of dollars because of the 2002 Explorer's delayed launch.
Ford insists that the delayed launch of the 2002 Explorer shouldn't sound an alarm bell for consumers - but the fact the media was denied access to both Explorer assembly plants should. Ford wouldn't want the media snooping around now, would they?
Ford has been mum on explaining why thousands of Explorers couldn't be shipped to dealers, but the people who assemble the Explorer told BlueOvalNews that some 2002 models have already been repaired up to five times to correct various defects - some so serious that Ford couldn't possibly ship them even if they wanted to. An employee at an Explorer plant told BlueOvalNews that they have been working massive overtime and weekends to
repair the 2002 Explorers so Ford can start shipping them. An estimated 75,000 are already presold. Here's a brief list of what's alleged to have been repaired before Ford issued the ship order on CERTAIN models:
1) Defective rear axle spindle nuts on first 8,000+ units were coming loose during test drives (see above photo).
2) The accelerator cables on some models were too long causing accelerator pedals to stick.
3) Ignition switches were popping out of the steering column when in the ACC position.
4) Luggage racks coming loose due to defective securing screws.
The above four issues are said to be vender/supplier issues and should not reflect on the engineering or build quality of the 2002 Explorer. Maybe. On the same token, Ford should take a cue and learn how to stop squeezing the life out of their suppliers to begin with, to insure quality products.
Ford's P.R. department, who is unarguably the best in the business, are releasing the usual "We want to make sure it's perfect," Blah Blah Blah rhetoric to insure the public that NO 2002 Explorer will ship before it's absolutely ripe. Sure, whatever. It's hard to ship a vehicle when the rear wheels allegedly fall off, isn't it? After all, these are production vehicles, the ones that consumers actually purchase.
What does Jac Jacques Nasser have to say about all of this? "If you look at our launch performance, I am totally (ticked) off with it." That's a great quote coming from the man who is single handedly purging Ford's best engineers and returning Ford back to the darkest days of product quality.