nitzer51
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- March 4, 2012
- Messages
- 172
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- seattle
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 2013 Explorer LTD
I live in a free-for-all state, South Carolina, where we don't even inspect our vehicles. I just located a 2014 Explorer that might be a suitable replacment for my '03. However, the 2014 Ex is in a California Emissions state. These vehicles have California Emissions and the engines are not labeled for be Flex Fuel which I assume is ethanol greater than 15%. Does anyone know whether there is, in fact, a mechanical reason that higher ethanol blends can't be used in a California Emission vehicle or is it just because higher ethanol blends don't meet California Emission standards?
I researched this as I bought my ex in Washington state, which also goes my California law. These non flex fuel cars cannot take flex fuel. The reason why. California does not allow flex fuel is bc they say that the flex fuel engines actually emit more pollution before the engine warms up than a regular gas engine....