QUOTE="UofMEngineer, post: 3801937, member: 348905"]Shoot me some examples of exactly what you're saying, and the POI names, I may be able to help. The item where results can show up across the country is the nav search engine. Some POIs get promoted so even if they're outside the area, they'll still show in the list. Searching for "Spartan Stadium" in East Lansing will show one in San Jose as well as an example. I think that's the type of thing you're referring to? I'm not a fan of that either personally as it can add needless steps to the process. Also, check out
this to make sure you're giving it what it's expecting, else it's a garbage in garbage out situation.[/QUOTE]
UofSTATEUPNORTHEngineer -
This reply is from the thread someone started about the big v small displays for 2020. I'm a 2017 Platinum owner, running SYNC 3, software version 3.0, build 18093. Our previous experience was with the My Ford Touch in our 2013 Edge. Infotainment there was terrible and the turbo crapped out right at 36K and therefore Ford would not address the failure because it was just out of warranty. Not impressed at all, but due to my Ford roots and probably a bit of insanity, bought the Explorer. Anyway, for our current ride, if there is something newer in terms of software, that is worthy of an entire thread on it's own in terms of how people get notified of available updates AND what improvements have been incorporated in said updates. In it's simplest form and doing a limited amount of research before we bought the vehicle, I thought when I'd pull in the garage, the system would connect to my home Wifi network, notify me that there was an update available, ask me if I wanted to install it (you know, sort of a PC standard way of pushing out updates), and that's all there would be to it. Not exactly. Again, another thread, but you'll find across other Ford blogs intermittent success with receiving updates this way. Short version is mine doesn't even come close to working this way so I have to update with a flash drive and unless I go out searching to see if there are updates, I have no idea if there's been something better made available. Even then, the description of the "improvements" for a new software version basically are non existent, so I'm installing something that I don't even know what it's changing. That problem is not unique to this situation; reference app updates on smartphones. In any event, I'm not too bad with tech "stuff" and my son is an IT guy, so I'd rate our team as well above average for these types of issues.
I don't keep a written or even a mental log of the exact words I'm using, but I have researched the "language" and am quite confident my phrasing is not the main source of my frustration with the performance of the nav system. We don't use the phone piece much and almost always use the console and/or steering wheel controls for music instead of voice commands. We have mostly given up on trying to use the nav system and frequently use phone apps like Google Drive, etc if we're traveling to a new, hard to find location. The vehicle nav system winds up being a secondary system to our phones assuming we can the the vehicle to find the location we're heading to.
I'm not exactly sure where the problem is with the voice recognition system since there are 2 main parts to it - first correctly interpreting what the user is saying followed by using that wording to perform a database search to find a match. It seems like it does a pretty good job at figuring out what words are being said except when trying to find POI's. The best way I can explain it is the Michelob Ultra beer commercial on tv where 3 personal assistant bots try to have a conversation. THAT is hilarious, but extrapolating that situation in to a moving vehicle is frustrating and downright dangerous due to distraction Again, wish I had a log to give you of all the examples we've experienced. The thing that baffles me is how many of the search results even show up. I've already specified a search place, so why would it show me results anywhere other than that. Even excluding that enormous shortcoming, it then dumps salt in the wound by showing "possibilities" that are neither anywhere close to the spelling of what you're searching for nor even remotely close to sounding the same.
Sorry I can't provide what you're looking for but REALLY appreciate you taking interest if you're doing so on behalf of Ford Motor Comp. The problem I have with all of it, and I don't think it is exclusively Ford's problem, is the car companies pushing a new or updated piece of tech out the door in their vehicles before it's ready, then downplay or ignore all the glitches. When we bought our Edge and once I figured out how horrible the infotainment system was, I went to the dealership to have a chat with our salesman, who I immediately realized had no clue about any of the tech and then proceeded to tell us how it wasn't that big of a deal because car's missions are to get people from point A to B. I told him that thinking will be the eventual downfall of vehicle manufacturers since the next generations of people don't see it that way and will have a hundred questions about the infotainment system, buy a vehicle based almost exclusively on the tech features, and do this all while not knowing a rocker arm from a rocking chair.
I'll close out for now by offering that when we first got the Explorer we thought SYNC 3 would be far superior to MFT, only to realize if MFT was a piece of junk, SYNC3 was only a faster operating piece of junk that is marginally better. There were numerous times where I told my wife that I'd like to have the CEO of Ford in the front seat, the chief infotainment R&D engineer riding in the back as well as one of the programmers. A lot of ranting and ultimately did not provide you any actionable data. Doubt I'll start keeping track of any of this either unless Ford wants to put me on a retainer
Oh, one last thing. GO BUCKS!!