Dismiss Notice



Register Today It's free! This box will disappear once registered!

95 to 01 long travel front suspension (for independent front suspension)

Discussion in 'Modified 1995-2001 Explorers' started by mountaineerbeast, July 29, 2011.

^^Searches ExplorerForum.com^^





  1. mountaineerbeast

    mountaineerbeast Active Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    City, State:
    Socorro, NM
    Year, Model & Trim Level:
    97 Mountaineer
  2. Support EF

    Special! - 2 Year Elite membership now through July 24 $20!

    Explorer Forum has probably saved you that much already, and will continue to save you money as you learn how to diagnose fix problems yourself and learn which modifications work without having to experiment on your own. Elite Explorer members see practically no ads, can add their own profile photo, upload photo attachments in all forums, and Media Gallery, create more private Conversations, and more. Join Today. Your support is greatly appreciated.



  3. Stang65fst

    Stang65fst New Member

    Joined:
    July 4, 2011
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Year, Model & Trim Level:
    2001 explorer
    I guess I can't figure out what is better to go SAS or one of these conversions. Seems like SAS would be cheaper. Any insight from anyone would be interesting.
     
  4. pechroc1

    pechroc1 New Member

    Joined:
    November 7, 2010
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've been pondering the same question myself. I never saw the dixon bros kits but it looks awesome. If money wasn't an option id go with that. But considering my truck and my budget I couldn't justify it when you could do an sas for a few hundred if you do the fab yourself. I personally Feel like ifs can be much better offroad and on pavement than a steering box and solid axle setup. My only concern with the ifs is the rack getting wacked out while hard offroading. And with the d bros kit you would have to solve the issue of a wider rear axle.
     
  5. SkyJumper

    SkyJumper DISABLED AIRBORNE VET Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    August 4, 2003
    Messages:
    897
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    City, State:
    SW Florida
    Year, Model & Trim Level:
    1999 Expedition XLT 4x4
    Dixons is known on here and has been talked about. But for the money they want, and the shaft angles it produces after install, and the wider stance it gives also, the cost to do a SAS full width axles would do the same and drive anfles to be worried about and much cheaper to do (leaf spring conversion). Those kits are more in line of race applications and the dunes and what not. Not a very streetable application in my opinion.
     
  6. IZwack

    IZwack Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    February 5, 2003
    Messages:
    21,786
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    68
    City, State:
    Germantown, MD
    Year, Model & Trim Level:
    1998 Ford Explorer
    Comparing a "long travel"(LT) kit and an "SAS" is kind of like comparing apples to oranges. Sure the LT can be used for rock crawling but it really was originally designed for the desert (high speed stuff) where as solid axles are often swapped into vehicles for slow, crawling stuff. Can a solid axled vehicle be used for the desert? Yes, its been done many times before (see dezertrangers.com etc..) but the high unsprung weight ratio of a solid axle really is a disadvantage at high speeds (not to mention the bump steer issue of most implementation of a solid axle setup).
     
  7. SkyJumper

    SkyJumper DISABLED AIRBORNE VET Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    August 4, 2003
    Messages:
    897
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    City, State:
    SW Florida
    Year, Model & Trim Level:
    1999 Expedition XLT 4x4
    That is what I was saying, those applications are for performance minded individuals that are going to hit the dunes and the similar. But for street and mud and rock, a SAS is the way to go. Street manners are excellent, and the capabilities are high. Ad the cost (if you know what you are doing and know what to look for) can be way less expensive and with great results.
     
  8. mounty71

    mounty71 It's green, not gray. Elite Explorer

    Joined:
    February 3, 2007
    Messages:
    3,566
    Likes Received:
    162
    Trophy Points:
    83
    City, State:
    Oakland, CA
    Year, Model & Trim Level:
    '00 Mountaineer
    A long travel IFS kit would be no worse than a home-built SAS on the street. It would probably be more streetable actually, considering you are using the stock suspension mounts. Don't choose between long travel or SAS based on price or ease of installation, because they are meant for totally different types of terrain. Make the choice based on what you want to do with your truck.
     

Share This Page







We Support Our Troops!