2TimingTom
Elite Explorer
- Joined
- October 12, 2010
- Messages
- 2,503
- Reaction score
- 110
- Location
- Littleton, CO
- City, State
- Littleton, Colorado
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- '97 XLT
I have a 2012 Escape, a 2006 Mariner (Escape).
The AWD actually engages the rear wheels at every acceleration- even on dry pavement with zero wheel spin. My ScanGauge is programmed to show it and I can watch it feather out as speed increases. Typically it's all FWD by 35 mph or so, but I've seen it applying some to the rear at 55 or so.
The interior of a 2012 or older Escape is similar to a first or second gen Explorer- except not quite as long. The seat bottoms in the first gen models (2001-2007) are known to be short and thus uncomfortable to some. The second gens are better.
I've driven my Mariner from CO to FL and back and was fine. I'm 6'1" and about 225lbs. I also used to drive it about 700 miles a week. I personally didn't find it uncomfortable.
Personally I find it interesting that you are comparing an Escape and an Explorer as they are 2 very different vehicles. I think you really need to take a closer look at your needs.
The AWD actually engages the rear wheels at every acceleration- even on dry pavement with zero wheel spin. My ScanGauge is programmed to show it and I can watch it feather out as speed increases. Typically it's all FWD by 35 mph or so, but I've seen it applying some to the rear at 55 or so.
The interior of a 2012 or older Escape is similar to a first or second gen Explorer- except not quite as long. The seat bottoms in the first gen models (2001-2007) are known to be short and thus uncomfortable to some. The second gens are better.
I've driven my Mariner from CO to FL and back and was fine. I'm 6'1" and about 225lbs. I also used to drive it about 700 miles a week. I personally didn't find it uncomfortable.
Personally I find it interesting that you are comparing an Escape and an Explorer as they are 2 very different vehicles. I think you really need to take a closer look at your needs.