Skyhiranger1
Active Member
- Joined
- February 6, 2000
- Messages
- 62
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- KC, MO area
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- '97 RANGER STX
Hey guys, I have a '97 Ranger that I am doing a solid D44 swap on. I am running the Skyjacker 8" springs off of the TTB lift.
My questions concern the draglink and trac bar angles.
I am trying to decide if it is better to mount the draglink under or over the pitman arm.....
Over pitman arm=shorter trac bar bracket (about 6" below the frame), greater angles on draglink and trac bar, more axle movement (side to side) when suspension moves.
Under pitman arm=longer trac bar bracket (about 8" below the frame)--more leverage on the frame, but lesser angles on draglink and trac bar, less axle movement (side to side) when suspension moves.
I know there are pros and cons to both setups, but which would be the better setup??
I have bushings that will allow the axle to move through its entire range of travel, without binding the rod ends, when mounting above the pitman arm. I am also running a brace from the engine crossmember for additional support for the trac bar bracket.
thanx guys.
My questions concern the draglink and trac bar angles.
I am trying to decide if it is better to mount the draglink under or over the pitman arm.....
Over pitman arm=shorter trac bar bracket (about 6" below the frame), greater angles on draglink and trac bar, more axle movement (side to side) when suspension moves.
Under pitman arm=longer trac bar bracket (about 8" below the frame)--more leverage on the frame, but lesser angles on draglink and trac bar, less axle movement (side to side) when suspension moves.
I know there are pros and cons to both setups, but which would be the better setup??
I have bushings that will allow the axle to move through its entire range of travel, without binding the rod ends, when mounting above the pitman arm. I am also running a brace from the engine crossmember for additional support for the trac bar bracket.
thanx guys.