Dismiss Notice



Register Today It's free! This box will disappear once registered!

TTB or SAS?

Discussion in 'Modified 1991-1994 Explorers' started by MiniGeneral92, July 7, 2011.

  • Searches ExplorerForum.com
    1. MiniGeneral92

      MiniGeneral92 New Member

      Joined:
      June 15, 2011
      Messages:
      13
      Likes Received:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      0
      City, State:
      Milwaukie,Or
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      92 XLT
      I'm planning on lifting my 92 XLT, and I think I'm gonna end up with about 8" or so by the time I'm done. So I'm wondering if I should spend the time and money to do a SAS or if I should just stick with the TTB?

      I've always had old Fords with a solid front axle so this is my frist experience with TTB. To me it seems like SAS is what it needs but if I can do it without that and still ride ok and get some decent flex with my TTB then I'll just leave it until I can get everything together and modified properly.

      So the overall question is, is 8" too much for the TTB to handle? Or will it still be alright?

      Thanks for any input guys,
       
    2. Support EF

      Join the Elite Explorers for $20

      Explorer Forum has probably saved you that much already, and will continue to save you money as you learn how to diagnose fix problems yourself and learn which modifications work without having to experiment on your own. Elite Explorer members see practically no ads, can add their own profile photo, upload photo attachments in all forums, and Media Gallery, create more private Conversations, and more. Join Today. Your support is greatly appreciated.


      to hide adverts.
    3. bobby walter

      bobby walter New Member

      Joined:
      October 26, 2002
      Messages:
      43
      Likes Received:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      0
      City, State:
      Houghton lake mi.
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      88 ranger ext cab 4x4
      with custom work 8 in is doable for it to take some mild abuse.....

      just depends on goals really.


      if you are not going to abuse it off road , an 8 in shelf kit with some superrunner type steering upgrades are ok imo..

      if you want to beat on it, a 4 in is a bit better. preferably a skyjacker type setup that is strong at the minimum for costa. gets spendy from there.

      what are your intentions? why 8 inches?
       
    4. Rick

      Rick Pumpkin Pilot Staff Member Admin Elite Explorer

      Joined:
      February 8, 1999
      Messages:
      31,088
      Media:
      40
      Albums:
      4
      Likes Received:
      594
      Trophy Points:
      143
      City, State:
      Wayoutin, Aridzona
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      '93 XL Pumpkin Edition
      Callsign:
      AB7FH
      My recommendation for anyone wanting to keep the D35 TTB and run big tires is to do the D44 knuckle swap.

      #1 It spreads the bearings farther apart which means they stay in adjustment and don't go bad nearly as quick as with the stock spindles.

      #2 You can run better hubs which are much stronger than even the manual D35 hubs.

      Going to a D44 or bigger front axle with a SAS will accomplish that and more.
       
    5. 86 slo-vo

      86 slo-vo Active Member

      Joined:
      March 26, 2009
      Messages:
      130
      Likes Received:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      0
      City, State:
      owensboro, KY
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      92
      As said above, depends on what you want to do.
       
    6. jmdirk

      jmdirk Active Member

      Joined:
      July 22, 2004
      Messages:
      238
      Likes Received:
      11
      Trophy Points:
      28
      City, State:
      Ottawa, Canada
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      '93
      You can get approx 8 inches and run 35s using a 6" Sky Jacker kit and some spacers. Certainly not the ideal setup, but the Skyjacker stuff can take a fair bit of abuse.

      You do have to keep a very close eye on your bearings though. Inspect, regrease and retorque frequently. Consider it a labour of love...and it's a heck of a lot cheaper than having a bearing disintegrate on you on the road. In my case it takes out both bearings, the rotor and the spindle. It even destroyed one of my hubs in one case.
       
    7. red.EDDIE.4x4

      red.EDDIE.4x4 Active Member

      Joined:
      May 26, 2009
      Messages:
      705
      Likes Received:
      7
      Trophy Points:
      18
      City, State:
      Tulsa, Oklahoma
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      '93 Eddie Bauer 4x4
      i would lean towards SAS, i chose TTB when i did my lift because i wanted a cheap way to get some height. now i actually regret it and wish i had saved my pennies more. if i could do it again i would go SAS the first time.
       
    8. Slowlyvverot

      Slowlyvverot Active Member

      Joined:
      August 27, 2009
      Messages:
      796
      Likes Received:
      2
      Trophy Points:
      0
      City, State:
      Greensboro, NC
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      93 ExElTee
      And also keep in mind there are plenty of people who regret not going to 1-ton axles right out the gate when they did a SAS on their truck. A D44 is less expensive to buy and swap in but by the time you add stronger aftermarket parts, you could have just swapped in a stock D60 for the same amount of money. And obviously you can build a 60 much stronger than a 44. Just something to think about, what are your views for this vehicle in terms of terrain and tires size? That will dictate the axle you would want to swap in.
       
    9. SuRrEaLNJ

      SuRrEaLNJ hail to the king, baby! Elite Explorer

      Joined:
      June 12, 2005
      Messages:
      2,712
      Likes Received:
      3
      Trophy Points:
      48
      City, State:
      out of my mind...
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      MUNK 07 Focus 97 XL1200C
      thats just the trucks way of making sure you pack/replace your bearing frequently
       
    10. 4x4junkie

      4x4junkie Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      March 28, 2002
      Messages:
      1,347
      Likes Received:
      4
      Trophy Points:
      0
      City, State:
      So.Calif.(San Fernando Valley)
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      '94 Ranger, '90 Bronco II
      I think what's more important on the bearings is making sure the preload is set properly, and not using cheap china-crap bearings or low-grade grease (yes, the D35 bearings can be finicky in that regard which is related to their closer spacing).
      I do mine about every 3-4 years or 20,000 miles or so and still have the original bearings in my D35 (I think I have somewhere around 80,000 on the axle now). That's mostly with running 33", now 35" tires too.

      To the OP: I guess I'll also join the crowd here to ask why so tall, and what size tires are you planning and what is your intended use? (Crawling rocks? Running your typical rutted fire/logging/mining/powerline trails? Blasting through the desert? Mud whomping? Driving the local mall parking lot...? Only one of those might you possibly need 8" lift for... (Ok, maybe two if you include the mall parking lot lol)
       
    11. jmdirk

      jmdirk Active Member

      Joined:
      July 22, 2004
      Messages:
      238
      Likes Received:
      11
      Trophy Points:
      28
      City, State:
      Ottawa, Canada
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      '93
      And let's face it, the TTB sucks for mud
       
    12. 4x4junkie

      4x4junkie Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      March 28, 2002
      Messages:
      1,347
      Likes Received:
      4
      Trophy Points:
      0
      City, State:
      So.Calif.(San Fernando Valley)
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      '94 Ranger, '90 Bronco II
      I guess if your suspension was sagging leaving the thing hanging way down in the way...
       
    13. jmdirk

      jmdirk Active Member

      Joined:
      July 22, 2004
      Messages:
      238
      Likes Received:
      11
      Trophy Points:
      28
      City, State:
      Ottawa, Canada
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      '93
      It's more a matter of having the nice round tubes of a solid axle versus the flat, comparatively large front profile of the TTB
       
    14. 4x4junkie

      4x4junkie Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      March 28, 2002
      Messages:
      1,347
      Likes Received:
      4
      Trophy Points:
      0
      City, State:
      So.Calif.(San Fernando Valley)
      Year, Model & Trim Level:
      '94 Ranger, '90 Bronco II
      I understand that, though it ain't that bad once you've raised it up some with coil spacers or longer springs (A TTB C&T'ed at the balljoints would be even better still).

      MiniGeneral here needs to come back and tell us what the heck it is he's trying to accomplish though. If 8"+ lift and mud running is his goal (or tires bigger than 36"), then certainly a SAS of some sort would make sense. Anything less than that though, it might be better to keep what's already under there and stick to a shorter lift.
       

    Share This Page







    We Support Our Troops!