Search results

I am not registering it in California, so that isn't an issue. My main concern was any negative performance related differences, (which there does not seem to be) as well as future parts replacement necessitating a more expensive version. The catalytic converter is an example.

I just looked at the further breakdown on both and the only differences are: "With 49 State/Non Green State Req" vs "With California/Green State Req" and "FFV-(Ethanol) Fuel" vs "For Unleaded Fuel" It is known that the California emissions won't allow FFV E85 fuel. I would just like to...

Strange, they both showed up in the initial screen for me. I don't have a login though so couldn't get any further than the general info. 1FM5K8F87EGA04892 shows "Emission: With California/Green State Req" 1FM5K8F83EGA04856 shows "Emission: With 49 State/Non Green State Req" Seems like a...

I have the window stickers for both, but other than stating gasoline vs Flexible Fuel Vehicle (E85), they both look the same to me. I am not sure exactly what I am looking for though. Window sticker - 2014 Limited with California Emissions Window sticker - 2014 Limited - no California...

I have dug a little more and found some information. Page 25 of this pdf indicates that there are 2 engine families for the 3.5L engine. One covers Flex fuel (EFMXT03.73DM)and only has a Federal certificate, the other is EFMXT03.73DE8 and is gasoline only and has certificates for both Federal...

2014 Limited - California Emissions vs 50 States I am interested in a used 2014 Limited, but the one I like was delivered with "California Emissions" compliance. I will not be registering it in California or any of the "clean states" and based on an experience with cali emissions on a...