Anyone with experience with keeping a car that the insurance company has totaled? | Page 2 | Ford Explorer Forums - Serious Explorations

  • Register Today It's free!

Anyone with experience with keeping a car that the insurance company has totaled?

All I've got to add is I've had a salvage titled truck, my old 2001 XLT 4.0 SOHC V6 actually was a salvage title, had a left front accident at some point wiping out the front clip, and that's most, if not all, of why I got a running driving 2nd gen for $400, made it a stubborn sale but the truck was top notch mechanically, in hindsight was probably better than my V8 2000 I drive now. I personally think if it's been a good car, and you're happy with it, buy it back, fix it, and drive it. Sure it's replaceable, but if it's a good car why do that?
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





for anyone who cares, the insurance ended up paying me a little under $2500 for the explorer I bought it back from them for $350. In illinois, if the car is over 9 years old you don't have to get a salvage title. I bought a used door, in the right color for a little under $200. The body shop is going to work with me to get the major damage fixed. It won't be perfect but I'm probably going to end up with some money in my pocket.
 






All in all, not bad.
 






You're going to have a nice bit left probably, and at that money, I'd buy any of my previous trucks, including my 270K mile V8 that's been rode hard in life back. You even get a clean title, here it'd be salvage non removable or something similar.
 






My daughter's Sable was totaled a few years ago. I thought we overpaid for the car at $3300 when we bought it, but the adjuster offered $4250 and they take the car, or $3750 and we keep the car. We kept the car, straightened the front enough to get the headlight to stay in, replaced the mirror, etc. In Iowa, we didn't have to do anything with the title since we kept it and the title never changed hands. Obviously, the car had no resale value, but she or her fiance drove it a couple of years until they traded in for $500 credit (supposedly) toward another car. Dealer promptly sent it to the salvage yard.
 






It's my understanding (probably BS but here we go) insurance companies now overpay on older vehicles, especially stuff like Explorers because in a collision of them vs modern stuff, the new stuff don't stand up, it destroys it and the old stuff is left generally fixable.
 






just picked up the car from the repair shop. Door was replaced front of the quarter panel near door sill was beat back into shape, Running board re-attached painted . Total came to $700, It is far from perfect but considering the rear quater pannel on the other side has a hole rusted through it at the top of the wheel well They did what I wanted them to do.

So summing up, I got paid $2400, paid $350 to keep the car, Paid $700 to make the major repairs, so that is $1350 in my pocket and still have a daily driver.
 






Not too shabby.
 






After 35+yrs behind the wheel, I hit my first deer with my 98 EB in Dec15. It hit square across the front smashing the grille, header panel, right headlight, marker light, put a little kink on the front corner of the hood where the head hit, and bent the trans cooler bracket. With150k miles and the age my insurance totaled it, paid me $3k and let me buy it back for $50. I fixed/replaced all but the hood, but my insurance won't give me full coverage because it's not in pre-crash condition. I learned that being in Virginia, I was not required to get a salvage title for it. Still driving it to work every day...
 






I've found a fair number of people actually go on Copart anymore, and pick out vehicles and drive to see them since a rebuild title vehicle is much cheaper to purchase as salvage and fix. I saw some guy on YouTube who picked up like a 97 Explorer, V8, with 42K miles for like $400. Granted you have to be licensed differently depending on where you are but it's worked out pretty well for several people I know.
 






sehaare: I know that this is an old thread, but what was the model and mileage on your explorer? I'm having to kiss mine goodby after an accident. Mine is/was an Eddie Bauer 1997 AWD with only 115K or so on it. In very good exterior condition for its age. Everything inside worked except the HVAC needed baffle replaced (it could still pump cold or hot with a little coaxing) and the CD Player ate the CD cassette and would not release it. Naturally, almost new tires on it . . . . M
for anyone who cares, the insurance ended up paying me a little under $2500 for the explorer I bought it back from them for $350. In illinois, if the car is over 9 years old you don't have to get a salvage title. I bought a used door, in the right color for a little under $200. The body shop is going to work with me to get the major damage fixed. It won't be perfect but I'm probably going to end up with some money in my pocket.
 






I was the 'victim' of 3 car accident in my daily WJ Jeep G.C....... person-at-fault insurance stated same - repairs exceeding blue book value - received nice check compensating me for vehicle - had receipts of work done raising award from basic blue book. Paid their insurance company $400 roughly for scrap they would've received. Spent about $250 making vehicle presentable again. Paid greedy Calif DMV about $180 plus another $60 in additional inspection fees --- driving it to this day....Explorer's my 4X / backup vehicle. Yep you heard it..... 2WD Jeep and 4X4 Ford !
 






You can buy it back from the insurance company for not much money (they'd only get scrap value for it). You can fix it up, but (at least in my state) you'll end up with a "salvaged" title. My state also makes you do other useless BS, like getting an inspection and maybe a title bond, but it's all BS and just a way for them to take around $200 from you. My "inspection" was a total joke. The guy doing the inspection didn't even look at the vehicle, just filled out some paperwork and took more money from me.

This happened when my daughter bought a previously totaled '01 Explorer from another state (without my involvement) and the other state's title looked bogus. It was a real PITA getting that truck titled and registered, but your situation shouldn't be as much of a hassle as it's already your vehicle.
 






My state also makes you do other useless BS, like getting an inspection and maybe a title bond, but it's all BS and just a way for them to take around $200 from you. My "inspection" was a total joke
EXACTLY...... of that $180 I paid DMV... $50 was for "their" "inspection fee" $ $ .....the guy didn't even look at my repairs / area's affected by accident - he just went straight to door sticker....scribbled some stuff on his form and signaled me to move forward....the "second" inspection required by third party- independent mechanic was a joke too....checked turned signals / brake lights and signed off - which DMV guy could've easily done - however this guy was required to jack up/ remove wheels and check rotors / brake assembly ....which he did not do anyway.
 






EXACTLY...... of that $180 I paid DMV... $50 was for "their" "inspection fee" $ $ .....the guy didn't even look at my repairs / area's affected by accident - he just went straight to door sticker....scribbled some stuff on his form and signaled me to move forward....the "second" inspection required by third party- independent mechanic was a joke too....checked turned signals / brake lights and signed off - which DMV guy could've easily done - however this guy was required to jack up/ remove wheels and check rotors / brake assembly ....which he did not do anyway.

Yeah, I also had to have a sheriff deputy come to my house and verify that the VIN number on the dash matched the original title. At least that was free. The DMV and state just want your money.
 






I had to show the young woman who came out to "Inspect" my Explorer where the door VIN was located. That's all she looked at, then went inside.

The brake and light inspection was more involved; guy drives it from parking spot to bay, hit the brakes on the way (brake check, done), then everyone in the shop spent ten minutes looking at the front suspension while the "inspector" filled out the certificate. He did notice the front marker lights were inoperative, but just advised me to get them working. I never even knew it had them so they must have been out for a long time. Replacing those bulbs took longer than the inspection. I was worried about the lack of ABS, but I guess it would hard to tell with a one pedal push in a parking lot while going less than 10MPH brake check.
 






sehaare: I know that this is an old thread, but what was the model and mileage on your explorer? I'm having to kiss mine goodby after an accident. Mine is/was an Eddie Bauer 1997 AWD with only 115K or so on it. In very good exterior condition for its age. Everything inside worked except the HVAC needed baffle replaced (it could still pump cold or hot with a little coaxing) and the CD Player ate the CD cassette and would not release it. Naturally, almost new tires on it . . . . M

1998 xlt mach stereo, sunroof, leather interior 4WD SOHC I'm thinking he mileage was around 130K but could have been as high as 150K
 






I was rear-ended, in my '91 Explorer, in a fast food drive through. The lady that hit me was obviously 100% at fault, and admitted it. But her insurance was dragging their feet, saying they needed to send an inspector, were going to total the car, etc., and I was getting sick of waiting on them, so I called our state insurance commissioner's office to ask how long they had before they had to cough up. Turns out they have 90 days, so I told them it had only been a month or so, so no problem.

But the lady at the commissioner's office still asked me which insurance outfit it was. I told her (Farm Bureau), and didn't think much of it.

Then I called MY insurance guy (State Farm), and he told me that they could NOT total my daily driver for less than some minimum "basic transportation" value, which is NOT the car's actual market value if it is, indeed, your daily driver. He said that value was something like $7500, but wasn't sure.

Further, he said they cannot just "total" your car and leave you without the equivalent vehicle. He stated that they must "make you whole", which means finding and delivering an equivalent vehicle, which you must agree is equivalent, or paying you what the estimated repair cost is.

In effect, the law here is: "Put up or shut up", meaning that if they're going to total your car, they effectively have to prove that it was only worth the value they're offering you by finding and delivering to you a replacement vehicle that you agree is a suitable replacement. You don't have to do the leg work. After all, you aren't getting paid to shop around for the car.

He also said that he (my insurance company) could, and would pay me, and then recoup the money back from the other insurance company if I wanted them to do so. He had some rather nasty-sounding term for this procedure, but I don't remember it.

Anyhow, he (my agent) wanted to make a conference call with me to the other insurance company's agent, so I stayed on the line. It turned out that nobody was at that office at that moment, so he left a message.

This was at about 4pm on a Friday.

About 8am the next day, the doorbell rang and it was Fed Ex with a check for the full super-high estimate that I'd gotten from the local Ford Dealer (about $1800). :)

They wanted to replace and repaint the rear lift gate and do some straightening.

Of course, I did nothing, because the seals were all intact, and everything still works fine. $1800 in my pocket.

So don't let the guilty driver's insurance company buffalo you! They always want to get off cheap, of course. And if you agree, they get away with it.

To this day, I don't know if the state insurance commissioner's office also called them, but somehow, they got the fear of God put into them that day, and stopped dragging their feet! Don't let 'em rip you off!
 






He also said that he (my insurance company) could, and would pay me, and then recoup the money back from the other insurance company if I wanted them to do so. He had some rather nasty-sounding term for this procedure, but I don't remember it.

It's called subrogation. You assign your rights to a third party (your insurance company in this example) monies owed to you.
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





Why would an insurance company give you the option of deciding whether or not they should go after the other insurance company for reimbursement of monies given to you as settlement rather than automatically doing so for their own benefit?
 






Back
Top