How to: - Front Coilovers for 4th Gen Lift | Ford Explorer Forums - Serious Explorations

  • Register Today It's free!

How to: Front Coilovers for 4th Gen Lift

Prefix for threads which are instructional.

Travis Brown

Elite Explorer
Joined
February 19, 2020
Messages
33
Reaction score
37
Location
California
City, State
California
Year, Model & Trim Level
2006 Ford Explorer XLT
In my quest to maximize the off road capability of my rig, I was getting ready to do some sort of custom swap similar to Ronin8002
where he custom welded a bunch of mounting hardware to get a 5" coilover into the front. As you guys know, aftermarket support for the 4th gen is minimal, so I figured this was the only way to go to get standard coilovers in the front.

Instead, I discovered that Fox makes vehicle specific coilovers for the F-150 which just happen to be very close to the right size for our Explorers.

Here are the stock strut specs:
Extended Length 518.7 mm ( 20.42 in)
Compressed Length 490.7 mm (19.32 in)
Travel Length 71.9 mm (2.83 in)
2.5" wide lower eyelet for 18mm bolt

I had already installed a 3" spacer lift, which adds 1.92" to the shock height, for a total of 22.34" at full droop, but I was still stuck with the stock suspension travel (which is a pitiful 4.5")

The Fox 985-02-007 is essentially a standard 2" IFP coilovers, but with an extended-length single-piece lower eyelet. Fox changes the upper mount plate, springs, damper tuning, and eyelet adapter to make it to work on F-150s, 4Runners, and other common vehicles, providing a different part for each. This one is for 2004-2008 F-150s. Here are the specs

Fox 985-02-007 specs
Extended 21.990"
Compressed 16.600"
Travel 5.390"
Springs: 650 lbs/in

As you can see it's less than a half inch shorter than a 3" lifted Explorer strut, but with twice the travel. Assuming a motion ratio of 1.6, this would give more than 8" of travel. Of course, the ball joints, CV axles, and tie rod ends will all limit it to less than that.
20240508_203339.jpg


It turns out that with only minor modifications, this can be bolted right into the Explorer front suspension. The main differences are the hole pattern in the shock tower and the bolt mount on the LCA.

Step 1 - Drill the shock tower
1716067814494.jpeg

I drilled 3x 1/2" holes. I placed them deliberately forward of center to improve clearance to the CV shaft and put more distance between them and the stock holes

Step 2 - Drill the LCA
20240509_203405.jpg

The stock explorer uses an 18mm bolt with a 2.5" eyelet width. The fox shock uses a 16mm bolt. The Fox shock comes with adapters meant to drop into the slightly larger 20mm holes in the F-150's control arms. I used a 13/16" drill bit to give me a very slightly oversized 20mm hole.

Step 3 - Fabricate a spacer

20240507_225610.jpg

The eyelet width on the fox shock is about 1/8" narrower than the Explorer's LCA. You'll need to make a spacer to fill the gap. I grabbed a large washer and bored it out to the same 20mm ID. You'll also need to grind it down to avoid interfering with the semi-circular sheet metal on the LCA meant to guide the oem strut into position.

Step 4 - Enjoy

20240510_083738.jpg


Here's the finished product. Note: I was already running a 3" lift, so I had already dropped the UCA 2" to avoid killing the upper ball joint. If you're not super handy with metal work, you could also just buy the control arms from BTF fab.

Another very important note: From the factory, the fox shocks are set with a very high preload (2.5") to handle the F-150's weight. You'll need to dial that back a lot to get proper ride height on an Explorer. Something like 1" should be about right. I have a heavy off-road bumper and winch, so mine is set at 1.25"
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year.
Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





Thanks for the article. I set you up with an Elite membership for your effort.
 






Wow, thanks for the info!! Perfect timing!

I had just started researching replacement struts/upgrades to my lame Traxda spacers, and mourning the loss of the Quick Lift struts.

Contrary to what Traxda proclaims i.e. no affect to stock ride quality, my ride quality has been much more harsh since the spacer installation many years ago.

So many questions . . .

1. How is the ride quality with the new Fox Coilovers? Is it better due to the increased suspension travel, or same/worse due to the stiffness of the F150-targeted springs?
2. Could you drill out the Fox bottom spacer to accommodate the stock 18mm bolt?
3. Instead of drilling new holes in the strut support at the upper mount, could a person build different top plates that would allow the use of the stock strut mount holes?
4. Have you come across any suitable replacements for the rear?

Cheers!
 






Wow, thanks for the info!! Perfect timing!

I had just started researching replacement struts/upgrades to my lame Traxda spacers, and mourning the loss of the Quick Lift struts.

Contrary to what Traxda proclaims i.e. no affect to stock ride quality, my ride quality has been much more harsh since the spacer installation many years ago.

So many questions . . .

1. How is the ride quality with the new Fox Coilovers? Is it better due to the increased suspension travel, or same/worse due to the stiffness of the F150-targeted springs?
2. Could you drill out the Fox bottom spacer to accommodate the stock 18mm bolt?
3. Instead of drilling new holes in the strut support at the upper mount, could a person build different top plates that would allow the use of the stock strut mount holes?
3. Have you come across any suitable replacements for the rear?

Cheers!

1) Ride quality is great once I set the preload properly. The springs aren't noticeably stiffer than the stock ride. The 650 lbs/in is similar to what Fox recommends for the 4Runner which is a very similar size/weight. I took it out to some desert roads near death valley and was very happy with how well it took the whoops. That extra suspension travel really helps. I've also done quite a bit of rock crawling with it and they performed pretty well there too.

2) This might be possible, but I didn't want to attempt it. Here's the diagram from Fox:

1725558948136.png

You can see that you don't have much material to remove before you start hitting the ball joint.

3) Yes, as long as you have a strut spring compressor, you can easily remove the top plate and machine your own. The strut bolt pattern on the Explorer is pretty narrow, so it seemed like drilling it out to a larger pattern would be easier and stronger than trying to re-machine the strut mount plate.

4) The rear suspension on the 4th gen Explorer is hopeless, so I just did a solid axle swap: Completed Project - Solid Rear Axle Swap. That let me use standard coilovers for the rear.
 






I appreciate the follow up!

Based on your idea, I've been investigating F150 alternatives as well. This led me to a Bilstein 6112 option. Sounds like these shocks could be better for me relative to all-around driveability, balancing on-road comfort as well as off-road capability . . . compared to the Fox 2.0.

The concern I have is what you mentioned with a clearance issue to the CV drive axle. The Bilstein has a 2.5" body instead of the 2.0" of the Fox.

Do you have any perspective on this? The Bilstein would likely be about .25" closer to the axle.
 






I appreciate the follow up!

Based on your idea, I've been investigating F150 alternatives as well. This led me to a Bilstein 6112 option. Sounds like these shocks could be better for me relative to all-around driveability, balancing on-road comfort as well as off-road capability . . . compared to the Fox 2.0.

The concern I have is what you mentioned with a clearance issue to the CV drive axle. The Bilstein has a 2.5" body instead of the 2.0" of the Fox.

Do you have any perspective on this? The Bilstein would likely be about .25" closer to the axle.
Amazing how this site brings like minded people together - I'm also looking into adapting 6112s onto our 4th gen.

The 4th gen *4runner* 6112s look very close to our 4th gen Exp:

More Information for BILSTEIN 47309975

They thin down near the lower mount just like our struts, which should prevent CV clearance issues. The bottom mount eye is different - our's is 18x63.5mm, while their's is 14x40mm. But came across this thread showing you can use Toyota panhard bushings:

Front strut lower bushing - poly replacement

Both the 4runner and our struts appear to use 40mm diameter bushings, so a bushing swap takes care of that. Not sure about the springs though - our front springs may fit over the 6112, with an a poly spring seat designed to fit the flat spring perches of the 6112. I'll do more research.
 






Back
Top