minelson17
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- June 23, 2008
- Messages
- 181
- Reaction score
- 5
- City, State
- Keizer OR
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1992 Ford Explorer XLS
I was just wondering if someone could confirm/deny my logic in regards to estimating my Miles Per Gallon on my lifted '92 Ex. Not that good MPG is my primary focus with this rig, but it'd still be nice to know.
Stock tire size = 28"
Newish tire size = 35" (a 20% increase in size)
If my logic is correct, the odometer clicks based on a certain number of revolutions assuming the stock tire size. Since the "orbit" has increased due to the tire size, or in other words the distance traveled per revolution has increased, so than has the distance traveled per number of miles tracked on my odometer.
Therefore, if my trip-o-meter shows 230 miles, in reality I have traveled 20% further (276 miles) on let's say 18.5 gallons (I know the tank size is actually 19.3, but I never run it completely dry).
So instead of dividing the 230 miles by 18.5 gallons for 12.4 MPG, I should actually divide 276 miles by 18.5 gallons for 14.9 MPG (let's call it 15).
Is that an accurate estimate?
If so, I think I can live with a '92 sitting on 35s (7+" of lift) with a cargo rack driving mainly city miles getting 15 MPG.
Stock tire size = 28"
Newish tire size = 35" (a 20% increase in size)
If my logic is correct, the odometer clicks based on a certain number of revolutions assuming the stock tire size. Since the "orbit" has increased due to the tire size, or in other words the distance traveled per revolution has increased, so than has the distance traveled per number of miles tracked on my odometer.
Therefore, if my trip-o-meter shows 230 miles, in reality I have traveled 20% further (276 miles) on let's say 18.5 gallons (I know the tank size is actually 19.3, but I never run it completely dry).
So instead of dividing the 230 miles by 18.5 gallons for 12.4 MPG, I should actually divide 276 miles by 18.5 gallons for 14.9 MPG (let's call it 15).
Is that an accurate estimate?
If so, I think I can live with a '92 sitting on 35s (7+" of lift) with a cargo rack driving mainly city miles getting 15 MPG.