TTB or SAS? | Ford Explorer - Ford Ranger Forums - Serious Explorations
  • Register Today It's free!

TTB or SAS?

MiniGeneral92

Member
Joined
June 15, 2011
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
City, State
Milwaukie,Or
Year, Model & Trim Level
92 XLT
I'm planning on lifting my 92 XLT, and I think I'm gonna end up with about 8" or so by the time I'm done. So I'm wondering if I should spend the time and money to do a SAS or if I should just stick with the TTB?

I've always had old Fords with a solid front axle so this is my frist experience with TTB. To me it seems like SAS is what it needs but if I can do it without that and still ride ok and get some decent flex with my TTB then I'll just leave it until I can get everything together and modified properly.

So the overall question is, is 8" too much for the TTB to handle? Or will it still be alright?

Thanks for any input guys,
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year.
Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





bobby walter

Member
Joined
October 26, 2002
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
City, State
Houghton lake mi.
Year, Model & Trim Level
88 ranger ext cab 4x4
with custom work 8 in is doable for it to take some mild abuse.....

just depends on goals really.


if you are not going to abuse it off road , an 8 in shelf kit with some superrunner type steering upgrades are ok imo..

if you want to beat on it, a 4 in is a bit better. preferably a skyjacker type setup that is strong at the minimum for costa. gets spendy from there.

what are your intentions? why 8 inches?
 






Rick

Pumpkin Pilot
Staff member
Admin
Elite Explorer
Joined
February 8, 1999
Messages
34,637
Reaction score
2,887
City, State
Wayoutin, Aridzona
Year, Model & Trim Level
'93 XL Pumpkin Edition
Callsign
AB7FH
My recommendation for anyone wanting to keep the D35 TTB and run big tires is to do the D44 knuckle swap.

#1 It spreads the bearings farther apart which means they stay in adjustment and don't go bad nearly as quick as with the stock spindles.

#2 You can run better hubs which are much stronger than even the manual D35 hubs.

Going to a D44 or bigger front axle with a SAS will accomplish that and more.
 






86 slo-vo

Well-Known Member
Joined
March 26, 2009
Messages
127
Reaction score
1
City, State
owensboro, KY
Year, Model & Trim Level
92
As said above, depends on what you want to do.
 






jmdirk

Well-Known Member
Joined
July 22, 2004
Messages
238
Reaction score
13
City, State
Ottawa, Canada
Year, Model & Trim Level
'93
You can get approx 8 inches and run 35s using a 6" Sky Jacker kit and some spacers. Certainly not the ideal setup, but the Skyjacker stuff can take a fair bit of abuse.

You do have to keep a very close eye on your bearings though. Inspect, regrease and retorque frequently. Consider it a labour of love...and it's a heck of a lot cheaper than having a bearing disintegrate on you on the road. In my case it takes out both bearings, the rotor and the spindle. It even destroyed one of my hubs in one case.
 






red.EDDIE.4x4

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 26, 2009
Messages
703
Reaction score
10
City, State
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Year, Model & Trim Level
'93 Eddie Bauer 4x4
i would lean towards SAS, i chose TTB when i did my lift because i wanted a cheap way to get some height. now i actually regret it and wish i had saved my pennies more. if i could do it again i would go SAS the first time.
 






Slowlyvverot

Well-Known Member
Joined
August 27, 2009
Messages
790
Reaction score
4
City, State
Greensboro, NC
Year, Model & Trim Level
93 ExElTee
And also keep in mind there are plenty of people who regret not going to 1-ton axles right out the gate when they did a SAS on their truck. A D44 is less expensive to buy and swap in but by the time you add stronger aftermarket parts, you could have just swapped in a stock D60 for the same amount of money. And obviously you can build a 60 much stronger than a 44. Just something to think about, what are your views for this vehicle in terms of terrain and tires size? That will dictate the axle you would want to swap in.
 






SuRrEaLNJ

hail to the king, baby!
Elite Explorer
Joined
June 12, 2005
Messages
2,700
Reaction score
9
City, State
out of my mind...
Year, Model & Trim Level
MUNK 07 Focus 97 XL1200C
#1 It spreads the bearings farther apart which means they stay in adjustment and don't go bad nearly as quick as with the stock spindles.

thats just the trucks way of making sure you pack/replace your bearing frequently
 






4x4junkie

Explorer Addict
Joined
March 28, 2002
Messages
1,344
Reaction score
8
City, State
So.Calif.(San Fernando Valley)
Year, Model & Trim Level
'94 Ranger, '90 Bronco II
I think what's more important on the bearings is making sure the preload is set properly, and not using cheap china-crap bearings or low-grade grease (yes, the D35 bearings can be finicky in that regard which is related to their closer spacing).
I do mine about every 3-4 years or 20,000 miles or so and still have the original bearings in my D35 (I think I have somewhere around 80,000 on the axle now). That's mostly with running 33", now 35" tires too.

To the OP: I guess I'll also join the crowd here to ask why so tall, and what size tires are you planning and what is your intended use? (Crawling rocks? Running your typical rutted fire/logging/mining/powerline trails? Blasting through the desert? Mud whomping? Driving the local mall parking lot...? Only one of those might you possibly need 8" lift for... (Ok, maybe two if you include the mall parking lot lol)
 






jmdirk

Well-Known Member
Joined
July 22, 2004
Messages
238
Reaction score
13
City, State
Ottawa, Canada
Year, Model & Trim Level
'93
Only one of those might you possibly need 8" lift for... (Ok, maybe two if you include the mall parking lot lol)

And let's face it, the TTB sucks for mud
 






4x4junkie

Explorer Addict
Joined
March 28, 2002
Messages
1,344
Reaction score
8
City, State
So.Calif.(San Fernando Valley)
Year, Model & Trim Level
'94 Ranger, '90 Bronco II
And let's face it, the TTB sucks for mud

I guess if your suspension was sagging leaving the thing hanging way down in the way...
 






jmdirk

Well-Known Member
Joined
July 22, 2004
Messages
238
Reaction score
13
City, State
Ottawa, Canada
Year, Model & Trim Level
'93
It's more a matter of having the nice round tubes of a solid axle versus the flat, comparatively large front profile of the TTB
 






4x4junkie

Explorer Addict
Joined
March 28, 2002
Messages
1,344
Reaction score
8
City, State
So.Calif.(San Fernando Valley)
Year, Model & Trim Level
'94 Ranger, '90 Bronco II
I understand that, though it ain't that bad once you've raised it up some with coil spacers or longer springs (A TTB C&T'ed at the balljoints would be even better still).

MiniGeneral here needs to come back and tell us what the heck it is he's trying to accomplish though. If 8"+ lift and mud running is his goal (or tires bigger than 36"), then certainly a SAS of some sort would make sense. Anything less than that though, it might be better to keep what's already under there and stick to a shorter lift.
 






Top