Found a weak link on a SOHC, at 293rwhp... | Ford Explorer Forums

  • Register Today It's free!

Found a weak link on a SOHC, at 293rwhp...

Doug904

Sponsor
Joined
March 30, 2001
Messages
533
Reaction score
1
City, State
Jasper, Alabama
Year, Model & Trim Level
2005 Roush GT
Well Brian Mckelvey remade his intake track and did away with that factory airbox. It definatly made a difference.

We started out with a new baseline of 283rwhp at 12:2 a/f ratio but then disaster struck the first time, the coolant temp sendor for the guage blew apart? The reasoning, he had taken it apart before and replaced the clip that holds it in with a different style clip, the clip didn't hold to say the least, look like ole' faithful spewing coolant, ahhaaa.

Well we got that fixed for then by bending the new clip in a bit and made sure it was good before the following run. I also went in and removed some timing up top, not because it was pinging but because I was scared we had blown a head gasket and that was actually pressure in the cooling system. We made the next run and it went great, 286rwhp. Wow, even by taking a few degree's of timing out it still had a gain, I think it was because the first run it got hot quickly when the coolant went and also got the blower belt wet.

For the next run we added in some more timing above what I had removed by a few degree's and I richened it up a bit too. We got the best yet, 293rwhp and 321 rwtq. This was great, and still absolutly no pinging or knock sensor activation.

Finally I went in and added just a couple of more degree's above 4000 rpm's because it was getting a little high in the timing department and we made the final pass, the power fell off up top and when we were letting it decel after the run it just shut off.

Well, after reviewing the fuel and spark curves that I had datalogged I thought it may have been some belt slippage, a wet belt equals a slipping belt on a blower, so we got some belt dressing out and sprayed it. When we went to start the engine that's when we heard it. It sounded like a car spinning over without a timing belt, if you have ever heard one of those. It spun over very quickly like it had no compression. We did finally get it to start but it was bucking and running horribly, it also had a metallic sound in the engine up high. That was it for the dyno runs.

We got it back to his house by way of trailor and even started it up and pulled it into the garage. Pulled the valve covers and found the rear tensioner on the passenger's side, of course it's the hard one, has collasped. We are doing some more investigation on why this happened and what we can do to prevent it in the future.

Either way this happened at only 6,100 rpm's so if you're thinking about winding your 4.0 up very far past this mark then you may wanna reconsider. Yes, we had a good strain on it with the HP and TQ numbers but still the timing chain really isn't a high stress component.


Here's the graph on the 293 run...


BrianM04112feb-29.jpg


Thanks, Doug.
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





yikes !!!!!!!
 






Those are impressive numbers. Just hope nothing major happened to the engine. Dang timing chains at it again!
 






Great numbers. Yeah everyone that has heard an engine with a broken timing belt will always know that sound. It always sucks
 






can i make the OHV make those kinda numbers? haha
 






Wudup yo word said:
can i make the OHV make those kinda numbers? haha


Sure, I have a guy making 287 rwhp on his old engine and I'm betting well over 300 now with a 93 OHV 4.0. Check him out at www.8secsplash.net and also there you will find the hardcore performance 4.0 forum.

Thanks Doug.
 






ha C4 tranny figures lol with those kind of numbers i can imagine that he is running a little nos or is it just a supercharger and nos
 












ha C4 tranny figures lol with those kind of numbers i can imagine that he is running a little nos or is it just a supercharger and nos

OK not to be mean or anything but please use the term nitrous or spray or juice or squeeze or any acceptable term that is used for nitrous. nos is actualy N.O.S. and is a brand name. nitrous oxide systems to be exact.
 






metstalker said:
ha C4 tranny figures lol with those kind of numbers i can imagine that he is running a little nos or is it just a supercharger and nos

Yeah the OHV guy is running a C4 tranny and is running nothing but nitrous but at the same time has a fully built 4.0 OHV, everything from Custom Forged flat top pistons to my 4.0 Performance Stage 3 cylinder heads and 422 camshaft. Actually though those numbers were only on a 65 shot and the DIS4 uptop was retarding timing... :eek:


what year SOHC was this


This was a SOHC out of a 2001 Ranger, I know it used to be mine and he transplanted it into a 2004 Ranger using all of the 04' stuff. Basically a direct swap. He bought the truck as a 3.0 because that was the only way he could get a regular cab. He put the SOHC and the 5-speed behind it.

One thing we have found though was the tensioner's say " 97TM" on them which would mean they are a 97' year model. Not only that but when we compared it to another 4.0 SOHC in the shop, got more then one man should own, the 97tm tensioner only had one oil hole in it where as the other had holes all the way around it.

Either way he has ordered two new tensioners for his engine and he swapped the others into it and it works fine now. So the next time he's in town we'll go back and maybe shoot for 300 the only thing now is his MAF is 21 ad counts away from pegging, an 80mm Explorer 4.6 MAF, so we'll also have to goto a 90mm mass air which isn't a problem as I have a few of those too.

Thanks, Doug.
 






Those are STD #'s do you have the SAE corrected ones?
 






TheRookie said:
OK not to be mean or anything but please use the term nitrous or spray or juice or squeeze or any acceptable term that is used for nitrous. nos is actualy N.O.S. and is a brand name. nitrous oxide systems to be exact.

sorry about the confusion but if i was referring to the system wouldnt i have capitalized the letters and put spaces it really souldnt be that big of a deal
 






Jason94sport said:
Those are STD #'s do you have the SAE corrected ones?


Sure, I have the dynojet file for the 2nd run and I've made a picture of them with it. The above picture was the actual dyno shops print out. I like to post those because they list the dyno's name and number so anyone can call and request verification.

http://webpages.charter.net/doug904/BrianM112pic2-29SAE.jpg

And for those who insist on 5250 torque and horsepower crossings....

http://webpages.charter.net/doug904/M112SAE5250.jpg

I forced the scaling as you can see by the rating numbers on the side..


It's about 3 hp less and 8ftlbs but still well up there....

Thanks, Doug. :)
 






Doug904 said:
Sure, I have a guy making 287 rwhp on his old engine and I'm betting well over 300 now with a 93 OHV 4.0. Check him out at www.8secsplash.net and also there you will find the hardcore performance 4.0 forum.

Thanks Doug.
That's crazy. What nitrous shot was he running?
 






Fascinating stuff. Thanks for sharing it with us. Too damn bad we couldn't get a 4R70W behind that, instead of a C4.
 






Umm, the OHV 4.0 has the C4 but the SOHC still has the stock M5OD and even the stock clutch.

Just wanted to ensure we knew that.

Thanks, Doug.
 






Featured Content

Back
Top