borderchris
Member
- Joined
- June 14, 2004
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- San Diego, CA
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 2003 XLT
Hey all- just finished installing my $169 MAC intake (3624), and de-installing in favor of stock with a drop-in K+N. Why? Well, the fit and finish are excellent- although the instructions are quite poor- if you're not a shady tree level one you might have issues. I disconnected the battery with the headlights on to clear the computer, and did some good varying-throttle driving for about an hour. Know what? No power increase, and some low-end loss, according to my G-Tech Pro- about 10% on the low end torque... Keep in mind it was a very careful installation, and I already have a good cat-back exhaust installed (Dynomax 17710 w/ 2.5 pipe).
Most importantly, though, IT DROVE TERRIBLY! The sound from under the hood was pure rice, and LOUD at that! I've had my share of intakes, but the resonance of this system is quite high-pitched, and annoying to all. At full throttle I actually got a high-freq feedback in the pedal!
This contrasts with the K+N FIPKS I've had in the past, with good results (10% HP/TQ+) on three vehicles, and no extreme resonance. Now I see why K+N uses thermoplastic- it doesn't resonate like metal, and doesn't heat-soak like metal. Oh well- I'm sure some people like the sound, but beware!
Most importantly, though, IT DROVE TERRIBLY! The sound from under the hood was pure rice, and LOUD at that! I've had my share of intakes, but the resonance of this system is quite high-pitched, and annoying to all. At full throttle I actually got a high-freq feedback in the pedal!
This contrasts with the K+N FIPKS I've had in the past, with good results (10% HP/TQ+) on three vehicles, and no extreme resonance. Now I see why K+N uses thermoplastic- it doesn't resonate like metal, and doesn't heat-soak like metal. Oh well- I'm sure some people like the sound, but beware!