FIND
Explorer Addict
- Joined
- December 27, 2009
- Messages
- 3,859
- Reaction score
- 17
- City, State
- Vermillion, SD
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 99 XLT V8 AWD
Yeah, that is exactly what I am saying, because it wasn't any "Just" an HHO generator that gave you a 37% increase in fuel economy. Hell, the Jet Propulsion Labs testing with bottled hydrogen couldn't generate that kind of increase, and they didn't have to deal with the parasitic drag that you have generating the hydrogen. Why was your Celica only getting 22 mpg anyway? Those things should get pretty near 30 bone stock on the highway. You know, if you had such an efficient electrolytic cell then, what is the problem now? Ever notice how many "experts" that support HHO keep saying how they aren't using it right now, or they aren't getting X increase right now, but that is only because they haven't built their planned cell yet?
But hey, don't trust me. I only referenced testing by the Jet Propulsion Laboratories, Popular Mechanics and THOUSANDS OF SCIENTISTS OVER THE PAST CENTURY AT CREDIBLE UNIVERSITIES. Some guy on the internet wrote a convincing article utilizing massive amounts of psuedo-science and you have experienced changes in FE that you couldn't explain.
If it helps, even Nikola Tesla thought generating hydrogen through electrolysis was really inefficient and tried to improve on it. He claimed to have done it, but through much more exotic means than you are talking about.
Yes, adding hydrogen to combustion and proper tuning can increase FE and lower emissions, but as you'll see, the methods used for adding said hydrogen are much more exotic than a stacked plate electrolytic generator and not feasible for use in daily driven automobiles. Any testing by credible organizations using electrolytic generation of hydrogen has ALWAYS demonstrated it is an inefficient process.
But hey, don't trust me. I only referenced testing by the Jet Propulsion Laboratories, Popular Mechanics and THOUSANDS OF SCIENTISTS OVER THE PAST CENTURY AT CREDIBLE UNIVERSITIES. Some guy on the internet wrote a convincing article utilizing massive amounts of psuedo-science and you have experienced changes in FE that you couldn't explain.
If it helps, even Nikola Tesla thought generating hydrogen through electrolysis was really inefficient and tried to improve on it. He claimed to have done it, but through much more exotic means than you are talking about.
Yes, adding hydrogen to combustion and proper tuning can increase FE and lower emissions, but as you'll see, the methods used for adding said hydrogen are much more exotic than a stacked plate electrolytic generator and not feasible for use in daily driven automobiles. Any testing by credible organizations using electrolytic generation of hydrogen has ALWAYS demonstrated it is an inefficient process.