2002 Explorer gets poor rating in bumper tests | Ford Explorer Forums

  • Register Today It's free!

2002 Explorer gets poor rating in bumper tests

Dolphan

Well-Known Member
Joined
June 3, 2000
Messages
281
Reaction score
0
City, State
La Mirada, CA
Year, Model & Trim Level
93 Limited
11/29/2001 - Updated 11:25 AM ET



Explorer, Liberty get poor ratings in bumper tests


Carlos Osorio, AP
The 2002 Explorer took heavy damage in the bumper tests.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Ford Explorer, the world's top-selling sport utility vehicle, suffered extensive bumper damage in low-speed crash tests, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety said Thursday.

The 2002 Explorer sustained $5,432 worth of damage in four tests conducted at 5 miles per hour, earning the institute's lowest rating for bumper performance.

The tests are designed to imitate the kind of impact that often occurs in commuter traffic and parking lots.

In a statement, Ford said it designs its bumper systems to meet government standards, company requirements and customer expectations, not the tests of the institute.

''These tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety are conducted to determine cost estimates to repair damage incurred in low-speed bumper impact tests and are not related to safety,'' the company said. ''In addition, these tests may not be representative of the type of damage that occurs in real world situations.''

The Chevrolet TrailBlazer was given the best rating of the four vehicles tested after suffering $2,445 in damage. All the damage was to the bumper, which protected the vehicle body.


DaimlerChrysler
The 2002 Jeep Liberty took heavy damage because of a rear-mounted tire.

Like the Explorer, the 2002 Jeep Liberty earned the lowest rating after sustaining $5,667 in damage. The worst result — more than $1,700 in damage — occurred when the vehicle was backed into a flat barrier, shattering the rear window and damaging the rear windshield wiper motor and the tailgate.

Adrian Lund, the institute's chief operating officer, said the Jeep Liberty performed so poorly because it has a spare tire mounted on the back. The spare extends beyond the bumper, so the bumper doesn't absorb any of the impact.

The news comes after a respected auto-enthusiast magazine rolled a Jeep Liberty sport-utility vehicle in a slalom test last month.

Another vehicle made by DaimlerChrysler, the 2002 Dodge Ram 1500, improved in the tests. It sustained $3,843 in damage in the four tests, compared to $8,438 for the 2001 model.

"The Ram used to have the worst bumpers among the large pickup trucks the institute tested, but now it has the best bumpers," Lund said.

DaimlerChrysler spokeswoman Angela Ford said the company was pleased with the Ram test results.

"But it's important to remember this test measures insurance claims cost and is in no way a reflection of vehicle safety," she said. "Although we attempt to keep repair costs low on all of our products, our primary focus is safety, both in terms of government testing and real-world safety parameters."
 






I just heard about that on the local news as well. But what I dont understand is how you back into a tall flat barrier at 5 mph. If you are backing into a parking spot against a wall you arent going 5 mph.
Adrian Lund, the institute's chief operating officer, said the Jeep Liberty performed so poorly because it has a spare tire mounted on the back. The spare extends beyond the bumper, so the bumper doesn't absorb any of the impact.

Okay. If it was merely rearended it would not be hit in the spare tire. It would be hit in the bumper.
 






I've gotten rearended twice. Once I was slammed on the brakes and there was a 20 mph differential. The second time, I was idling forward and there was a 15 mph differential. Both times, I got it fixed for around $150. In the Institute's calculations, each would have cost around $800.

You've gotta know that their calculations are extremely high-balled, and their tests are performed at 5 mph, but with pushing by the vehicle, not coasting. Accidents are different under acceleration or steady throttle than with coasting conditions.

Oh well, I just take everything with a grain of salt.
 






I get somewhat upset when I see all these bumper crash tests. Their numbers are usually inflated and very neagtive. 5mph is pretty fast to hit a rounded concrete barrier. Of course there is going to be a lot of damage.

It just seems to me like this is marketed too much as a bumper/parking lot test. Most things you hit in a parking lot will be other vehicles not a ridgid concrete pillar All I know is that I don't back out of parking spaces at 5mph when there is something I could hit.

Eric
 






Featured Content

Back
Top