There is just so much information to try and remember with these new Explorers.
Peter
You should try to Engineer one of these puppies! I'm a computer nerd by profession, and deal what we call "complex systems" (which is pretty much everything these days..). I don't do cars, and based on what I know, I'm kinda glad about that
Pretty much about 75-80% of all car features are now software enabled (provided by software). So cars are now basically software systems.. And what is the first thing tells you to do when you call tech support. Reboot!
Also, to give you an idea of how complicated cars are, here's a comparison between a modern car and the Space Shuttle:
Space Shuttle:
5 computers
~500,000 Lines of computer code
Modern Car:
50-70 multi-core computers
~15 Million lines of computer code
As we all know, despite the "safety above everything" mentality of NASA we still had some horrific failures of the Space shuttle. But then again as John Glen once said (when he was still an Astronaut): "It's a strange feeling sitting atop of a complex spacecraft made out of 100's of thousands of components, all provided by the lowest bidder!".
In the commercial world, fear of liability is a significant design driver, as well as safety regulations, and trying to ensure fail safe designs often supersedes usability or convenience. The days of where there are people who know how everything is intended to fit together in the system top to bottom are gone, and so it doesn't surprise me anymore when I see things put together in a way that often fails to meet the original intent. In the case above though, I'm pretty sure that adaptively relearning the transmission is a feature that was considered as worth the inconvenience of the relearning period that occurs after power failures, and better than not having the adaptive learning feature in there at all.