96 D35 vs 97-01 D35 | Ford Explorer Forums

  • Register Today It's free!

96 D35 vs 97-01 D35

KelBench400

Member
Joined
May 4, 2005
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
City, State
Whitehall, PA 18052
Year, Model & Trim Level
96 XLT AWD
I'm looking to swap a 97+ front diff onto my 96 AWD. Are there any differences? I've seen references to vacuum lines that control engagement in 4x4 models. Since I'm AWD, is this something I have to worry about?

Thanks
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





I don't believe so. Yours should have the full time axle which is what they all started coming with in 97.

Not sure about any of the other specs though. It would take laying them side by side to know for sure. If you do, be sure and take lots of pics to show us. :)

-Joe
 






Isn't the vacumn disconnect in the spindle/hub assembly anyway? I'm pretty sure the front axle housings are all the same from 95 up to 01 Explorers as well as all the newer IFS Rangersm, Explorer Sports and Sport Tracs (except the new body Tracs).
 






CougarX said:
Isn't the vacumn disconnect in the spindle/hub assembly anyway? I'm pretty sure the front axle housings are all the same from 95 up to 01 Explorers as well as all the newer IFS Rangersm, Explorer Sports and Sport Tracs (except the new body Tracs).

Nope. The 95 and 96 Explorers use a center-axle disconnect on the front axle. It breaks the passenger side axle shaft right at the diff. In theory, it allows the front driveshaft, ring gear, and carrier to stop turning when set to 2wd. In reality, it slows down, but seldom stops turning all together due to the transfer case design.

For 97, they did away with the CAD in lieu of a live axle. Since the Control Trac 4wd system worked so well in automatic but customers complained about a lack of a selectable 4high, they did away with the 2wd position in lieu of 4auto full-time and a selectable 4high.

Now, the live front axle works just fine on a Ranger with a 13-54 transfer case that completely mechanically disconnects the front half of the drivetrain, when used in conjunction with some type of hub-lock on the front axle ends. That allows the t-case to disconnect, and the halfshafts to disco from the wheels, allowing the entire front drivetrain to come to rest when not in use.

Essentially, everything except the 95-96 Explorers *should* be the same front axle from the pinion to the axle flanges, but again, I can't say for sure.

Also, the later axles *should* work in a 95-96 Explorer, but you'll lose the center-axle disco which *may* cost you an extra MPG or so. IMHO, it would be a worthwhile swap if the CAD is having issues.

-Joe
 












CougarX said:
Did not know that. I always thought the disconnect was at the hubs. Thanks for the info, now I know!

It is on all of them except for the 95-96 Explorers, and there is no disconnect on the 97-ups.

Also, the full size trucks and Expeditions use a supre-sized version of the 96-96 Explorer setups. Same principles and, in the case of the Expedition, the same wiring in a lot of cases! If you look at a schematic for the electric shift control for the Explorer and Expedition, you'd swear they were the same vehicle!

-Joe
 






Thanks all.

I'll take pictures when I have both out of the truck.
 






Featured Content

Back
Top