Automakers Push Limits Of Gasoline Internal Combustion Engine | Ford Explorer Forums

  • Register Today It's free!

Automakers Push Limits Of Gasoline Internal Combustion Engine

Rick

Pumpkin Pilot
Staff member
Admin
Elite Explorer
Joined
February 8, 1999
Messages
35,467
Reaction score
4,547
City, State
Wayoutin, Aridzona
Year, Model & Trim Level
'93 XL '20 ST
Callsign
AB7FH
By John Fossen, FCN

There's a lot of life left in the gasoline internal combustion engine, and new technologies will continue to squeeze out more horsepower, better fuel economy and fewer emissions, says one auto analyst.

"There is a whole range of stuff coming, such as computer controls and injection systems," said AutoPacific's Jim Hall. "Every time somebody counts the (internal combustion) engine out, improvements are made."

In recent years, improvements such as three and four valves per cylinder and variable cam timing have all helped the engine breathe better.

"The more air an engine breathes in and the better it is managed within the combustion chamber, the better it is for power, torque, fuel economy, and emissions," said Christopher Borrello, Ford powertrain strategist and competitive analyst.

Advancements in sensors, actuators, and computer software have allowed for more precise fuel delivery into each cylinder, which increases engine performance and limits emissions. Direct injection of fuel takes the process to an even greater level.

"In most engines in North America today, fuel is injected into the intake air stream, and the mixture of fuel and air then rushes into the cylinder. With direct injection, fuel is sprayed directly into the combustion chamber at high pressure, then detonated," explained Borrello. "This typically enables both increased power and fuel economy."

Direct injection is common on diesel engines, but has only recently appeared on a few gasoline engines in the North American market.

"Direct injection is a little more costly, but offers several benefits," said Borrello. "We're seeing this technology on more expensive vehicles, but it's already moving to higher volume products."

Hall singled out direct-injection systems from Toyota and Volkswagen as among the best in the industry. He also sees cylinder deactivation, also known as variable displacement, as potentially becoming more widespread. This technology, typically used on V-8 engines, shuts down cylinders not needed, such as while highway cruising, in order to improve fuel economy.

"It's incredibly complicated, but appears to have no negative impact on power when running on eight cylinders," said Hall.

"Cadillac tried cylinder deactivation in the early 1980s, but it failed because there wasn't enough computing power to make it work," said Borrello. "Now there is, and several automakers are using cylinder deactivation. For the time being, Ford has opted to pursue other technologies to improve fuel economy, but we're continuing to evaluate variable displacement."

Borrello thinks that turbochargers will increase in popularity. Turbochargers force more air into an engine to boost performance. This technology allows smaller engines to produce as much horsepower as larger engines, with better overall fuel economy.

"Turbos are expensive," Borrello said, "but I think we're going to see more of them in the coming years combined with direct injection."

Hall sees electric valve actuation as a potential new engine-enhancing technology, albeit down the road a bit.

"Basically, we're talking about an engine without a camshaft, which would allow for true 100 percent independent control of engine valves," explained Hall. "But that will require a lot more sophisticated computer capability than we have now."

"The extent to which we can control the valves -- the engine intake and exhaust valves -- will go a long way in determining how much more we can boost fuel economy, horsepower and emissions performance in gasoline internal combustion engines," said Borrello. "Hybrids and diesels will make inroads, but the gasoline internal combustion engine isn't going away anytime soon.
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





I think that the performance and economy gains that can be had by eliminating the camshaft and going to electronically controlled valves is going to be amazing. At idle and low throttle openings you could run a super mild "profile" when you get on it, open those valves up and increase the duration and overlap. Instant race cam.
 






On-the-fly cam shaft profile change.. What everyone is dreaming of.

I can see two types of mods - one is ECM based, the other is replace the actuators for more speed/response/push.
 






Interesting. Looks like there is quite a bit of potential in this new technology. I wonder what other kind of computer technology we would need in order to put this into widespread use.
 






In order to replace a solenoid, it would require digging into the top of the engine. On some minivans, like mine, it is almost impossible to get to anything as it is. It would require dropping the engine just to replace something inside of it. If they would make it into modular solenoid body that is mounted externally, then it would be more practical. I think the engine's profile will also be smaller as a result, since it wouldn't have a camshaft, and a timing chain.
 






It's about time that manufacturers get off their butts and wring out more power and efficiency. I mean really if they could get 1500hp out of a 1.5L F1 engine back in 1986 why has it taken so long for any of that technology to get into passenger cars?
 






Paul Gagnon said:
It's about time that manufacturers get off their butts and wring out more power and efficiency. I mean really if they could get 1500hp out of a 1.5L F1 engine back in 1986 why has it taken so long for any of that technology to get into passenger cars?


I think big part of it is the cost of it all. What did they spend to get 1500 HP out of a 1.5L motor? I bet it was a alot.

The auto makers are not going to make a product that is too expensive for its consumers. Only now are you seeing more hybrid cars on the road. Hybrids have been around for many years but the cost has kept them from the mass markets. The technology has been around a while and has paid for it self. You will see a big drop in hybrid prices in a few years.

Look at hydrogen cell technology... Its there. Why do we not see it all over? Its the cost. Hummer makes a hydrogen powered vehicle. Saw it at Disney. It cost about 3 times a standard Hummer.
 






jp450 said:
I think big part of it is the cost of it all. What did they spend to get 1500 HP out of a 1.5L motor? I bet it was a alot.
I think the better question is: How long would that engine last?
 






Depends on whose right foot it is :D

You sparked a memory of mine, back in the '80s when I worked for a Kawasaki dealership. When the superfast 1100 GPz and the Ninjas started coming out, we had people ask if they could rent one.... one of them didn't understand why we wouldn't and said it shouldn't be a big deal, he was "only going to drive it for a quarter of a mile". LOL.
 






Featured Content

Back
Top