MrShorty
Explorer Addict
- Joined
- December 27, 2001
- Messages
- 5,073
- Reaction score
- 21
- City, State
- Spanish Fork, UT
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 92 XLT and '87 Bronco II
Opera House has mentioned on several occasions that a fuel pump current below ~5 amps is indicative of a fault in the fuel delivery system.
For fun, I hooked up an ammeter to mine and checked. Got a steady 2.8 to 3.2 amps. Current varied as expected (2.8-2.9 A at high vacuum conditions, 3.1-3.2 A for low vacuum conditions). As a further check, I put fuel pressure gauge on it to see the fuel pressure at idle (Didn't want to try to drive around with the gauge hooked up). Fuel pressure at idle is right where it should be, and didn't drop off when the engine RPM was raised. Other than leakdown (I think the check valve in the pump is bad), the fuel pressure test showed everything perfect.
I may have just answered my own question: a bad check valve. Isn't the check valve a standard ball + spring type check valve? The pump has to generate a certain pressure to overcome the spring in the check valve. If the check valve isn't closing (bad spring or otherwise stuck), then the pump doesn't have to work to overcome the check valve. Since pump current is a measure of how hard the pump has to work, you eliminate one source of resistance to fuel flow and the pump current will go down. Seem reasonable?
To date, I have resisted the idea of replacing the pump solely because of a bad check valve. The cost and pain of changing a pump to avoid priming the pump two or three times on cold starts just hasn't seemed worth it.
For fun, I hooked up an ammeter to mine and checked. Got a steady 2.8 to 3.2 amps. Current varied as expected (2.8-2.9 A at high vacuum conditions, 3.1-3.2 A for low vacuum conditions). As a further check, I put fuel pressure gauge on it to see the fuel pressure at idle (Didn't want to try to drive around with the gauge hooked up). Fuel pressure at idle is right where it should be, and didn't drop off when the engine RPM was raised. Other than leakdown (I think the check valve in the pump is bad), the fuel pressure test showed everything perfect.
I may have just answered my own question: a bad check valve. Isn't the check valve a standard ball + spring type check valve? The pump has to generate a certain pressure to overcome the spring in the check valve. If the check valve isn't closing (bad spring or otherwise stuck), then the pump doesn't have to work to overcome the check valve. Since pump current is a measure of how hard the pump has to work, you eliminate one source of resistance to fuel flow and the pump current will go down. Seem reasonable?
To date, I have resisted the idea of replacing the pump solely because of a bad check valve. The cost and pain of changing a pump to avoid priming the pump two or three times on cold starts just hasn't seemed worth it.