rancho RS9000 or RSX? | Ford Explorer Forums

  • Register Today It's free!

rancho RS9000 or RSX?

Ex95XLT

Rollin on Dubs
Joined
November 12, 2001
Messages
431
Reaction score
1
City, State
Vineland
Year, Model & Trim Level
98 EB
which shock should i get? i want new shocks...dont know which one to get...RSX better for offroading?
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





I don't know much about the RSX, but I love my 9000's. They are adujustable for the terrain your on.
 






anyone got an opinion on this?
 






the rsx is self adjusting... pretty good

the 9000 is adjusted by you....and also great shock

personally i would get the 9000s
 






The only bad thing I've "heard" about the rsx shocks is that they are shorter than the rs9000 for the same application. If you order an RSX and an rs9000 for a 2.5" lifted explorer (rancho lift) the RSX shock is actually shorter than the rs9000.

We have a set of rs9000's on our Explorer (1992) and now have 80k miles on them. I used to drive with them set at 2 up front and 3 in the back.. now I use 3 up fron tand 4 in the back.. (on city roads).. I drop them 1 notch when I'm wheeling.

~Mark
 






RSXs bite.

I can confirm that the RSXs are shorter than stock for a stock application or TT lift. They also "wear out" quickly as mine were only on for 6 months before they softened up too much. Lastly, one of them broke a couple of weeks ago. The top mounting bracket split in two.
Go with the 9000s!
Rick
 






Featured Content

Back
Top