JoshMcMadMac
Explorer Addict
- Joined
- December 20, 2009
- Messages
- 1,042
- Reaction score
- 10
- City, State
- Waynesboro, PA
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 2002 Mercury Mountaineer
Do you have data showing that those parts are more failure prone than with other transmissions? Seriously - an automatic transmission is a "wear point" and it will wear out. When you start talking bands, you are talking general rebuild items, and that is pretty much the same for all automatic transmissions that use them. And like most things, a never maintained tranny is more likely to croak earlier.
And yes, there are $200 fixes that will delay shelling out $2K for another 50K miles.
Every fricking rebuilt automatic starts at $1500 and goes up - that's just the cost of running them.
The 5R55W/S-series is well understood - no surprises. And frankly, in a daily driver Explorer, I don't see a reasonable alternative. It would be really cool if someone could work through a 6R-seriese retrofit - but after reading one fellow's work it looks way beyond the capability of your average home mechanic.
Get your panties out of a wad. Spend any amount of time reading around here, you will see the common denominators of transmission issues...to include bands breaking, not wearing. I forgot to mention the valve body, which has a few places for improvement too.
Maintenance is one thing, but the preponderance of 50k-60k mile transmission failures on the 3rd gen Explorers clearly goes beyond that.
That said, the point you are missing is that I agree with you that it is (as a whole) a good transmission. Get a remanufactured unit with all of the issues addressed from RockAuto for ~$1600, to include the latest revision of solenoid block and a fresh torque converter. Swap it in along with good Mercon V, and you have a transmission that will outlast the rest of the vehicle. The problem is, people have a reasonable expectation that they should not have to do that; that the vehicle should have that lifelong transmission from the beginning.