kert0307
Explorer Addict
- Joined
- September 6, 2005
- Messages
- 2,411
- Reaction score
- 11
- City, State
- Pella, Iowa
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- '00 Sport and '89 B2
Well, I thought I would start a separate thread for this than my B2 SAS in case anyone else is interested in doing a similar swap since most will swap in a 4.0 or 302 v8 into a B2 and as of yet I have not found a B2 with the inline 300.
My reasons for choosing an inline 300 engine
1. I wanted to change to a carberated setup to get rid of the EFI system and eventually convert it to run on propane
2. I wanted to stay in the ford family which pretty much left me with the 289, 302, 300, and I threw around a 351, but it seemed like overkill for what I needed in a trail rig
3. The 300 makes more torque at a much lower rpm than the 302 which is great for off-road (223 lbs.-ft. @ 1600 rpm stock)
4. The 300's are known for being extremely reliable
5. The 300 is a long narrow engine so width shouldn't be an issue.
6. It would be a unique swap into a B2
So, lets start off with some pictures. These first pictures show relative sizes of the 300, on the engine stand to a 302 used in a marine application. The 300 measures about 3 inches longer than the 302.
I chose the NP435 4 speed transmission because it is a simple strong transmission with a super low granny first gear (6.69). Here is is mounted to the engine for mock up.
So far, here are my limiting factors for installing the engine/trans combo. Oil pan is hitting the front cross member and shifter location is hitting the firewall. I might be able to remove the top cover of the transmission to make it fit to start on mounts.
My reasons for choosing an inline 300 engine
1. I wanted to change to a carberated setup to get rid of the EFI system and eventually convert it to run on propane
2. I wanted to stay in the ford family which pretty much left me with the 289, 302, 300, and I threw around a 351, but it seemed like overkill for what I needed in a trail rig
3. The 300 makes more torque at a much lower rpm than the 302 which is great for off-road (223 lbs.-ft. @ 1600 rpm stock)
4. The 300's are known for being extremely reliable
5. The 300 is a long narrow engine so width shouldn't be an issue.
6. It would be a unique swap into a B2
So, lets start off with some pictures. These first pictures show relative sizes of the 300, on the engine stand to a 302 used in a marine application. The 300 measures about 3 inches longer than the 302.
I chose the NP435 4 speed transmission because it is a simple strong transmission with a super low granny first gear (6.69). Here is is mounted to the engine for mock up.
So far, here are my limiting factors for installing the engine/trans combo. Oil pan is hitting the front cross member and shifter location is hitting the firewall. I might be able to remove the top cover of the transmission to make it fit to start on mounts.