- Joined
- March 13, 2005
- Messages
- 7,262
- Reaction score
- 22
- City, State
- Martinsburg WV
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 84 BII "Li'l Samson"
So yeah, almost a year later and I'm just now getting around to it. Plans have been tweaked quite a bit.
Debating, should I do my arms angled in at a more extreme angle or more parallel to each other? I've seen itsaid that an extreme angle will reduce bind but increase the tendency to roll. Also should build both arms the same or make one "wrested". My last SAS used Y-link radius arms and it made no difference if I pulled one upper.
![]()
When I used torun rear radius arms something like your thinking, I ran wristed, what a difference when doing trails and you get all the more articulation when I removed one bolt/pull pin. I had both arms exactly the same with four mounting points in the rear, and then just removed one when I wanted it wristed. If they're not wristed it will act like a traction bar with all four bolts in at rear. One was a pull pin.
But the down side is you will get all kinds of rear steer, now remember I have coilovers. On my angles looking down from the top I had them about parallel with the frame, main reason I run on the outboard side of the frame.
I know on my new double tri-angulated linked D70 that I had to raise the upper link from rear to frame end to better control the roll axis since I do not need a track bar no more plus no more rear steer issues. Now this is for better street manners also. For trails I can move the tie in point further down if need be. That's one reason I have multiple tie in points.