"I doubt his hot rod idles below 1500 rpm."
Most likely your right....One interesting thing that really encouraged me was a report that the 4.6 in these SUVs are tuned to product some 80% of its peek torque at 1500RPMs and only gains some 20FP more at its peek of 3K.
Thus one problem I am aware of is lugging an engine, where you need MORE throttle and thus fuel to keep it running and pulling the load below its torque peek. MPG is made only when an engine can easily pull its load normally near or at its torque peek.
Most of my early Chevy 350s had their torque peek at 2800RPMs dropping them to 1500 will not work.
Yet my 93 350 Van engine with its overdrive transmission had a torque peek at 2200RPMs and it seemly could make good MPG at 2000RPMs. But that was at 60/65MPH and I cannot drive a 65MPH...
My old 2000 Mercury Grand Marques with its NPI engine (Not performance Improved, 200HP vs 04's PI and 250HP) WAS able to get 27/30MPG at 1750RPMs at 65MPH stock, and running a lean burn setting of 16.4 air/fuel ratios could get 34/35MPG.
This was not practicable for day to day driving, it was a manually changed A/F system only able to do as a test.
I am looking for someone willing to do such a tune...of to learn to program a AEM's 30-1930 Universal Fuel/ignition Controller a addon power tuner that CAN be programed to slip into a lean burn under preset conditions like a RPM range of 1500 to 2500, and under a light load to run lean and to automatically slip back to stock 14.7 A/F ratios with any change of load requiring more fuel.
It can also be used for power tuning, so I can have it both ways, better MPG at low RPMs and a little more performance in higher RPMs, and with time peek both settings for their max.
The main drawback is they are not a cheap fix. If you can find one they can run from $500.00 UP.
I got one a decade ago, and the programing was a stopping point for me then, plus I was searching for a simple easier low cost fix..one(s) that I could buy/make and install for under 1K and make a bunch of money doing them, so I passed it by as too costly in price and time to tune. By the time one has bought one and fine tuned it the costs looked to run around $1500 to 2k...not a great selling point.
But I now can take the time to tune it FOR my own SUV I fully plan on adding it to my Explorer as well. Inless I do find atuner to do it FOR me and thus other.
Much as I plan on running a 85/90 Camaro;s TPI with ITS built in Lean Burn Cruse (later called Highway mode) program which back in the day allow them to get 30/35MPG on my special SBC 383.
Yes GM did it back in the 80s....
So it is not a wild out there Idea. But it can make more NOX, not good. But add more EGR of water injection to clean that up.
Rich