-
Ford Explorer Community - Maintenance - Modifications - Performance Upgrades - Problem Solving - Off-Road - Street
Explorer Forum Covers the Explorer ST, Explorer Sport, Explorer Sport Trac, Lincoln Aviator,
Mercury Mountaineer, Mazda Navajo, Ford Ranger, Mazda Pickups, and the Ford Aerostar
Register Today It's free!
Anyone running Geolander MTs
- Thread starter xjames
- Start date
- Joined
- February 9, 1999
- Messages
- 11,923
- Reaction score
- 133
- City, State
- Vail, Arizona
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1992 XLT 4x4
We ran them for a while. In short...
They are directional (makes rotating them interesting)
They are very grippy (good when wheeling)
They are soft (not good for longevity)
They are 2 ply sides (at least they were when we ran them about 6 years ago).. sides aren't as puncture resistent as others (like BFG)
They start out noisy and get worse over time.
We were getting about 25k miles on them (which for us was about one year). The rears actually wore out faster than the fronts for us.. We have a rear locker which I know makes the tires wear faster... w/out a locker you may get more miles.
here are some old pics I was able to find with our '92 running them (on 15x8 rims)
Dead Link Removed
Dead Link Removed
Dead Link Removed
They are directional (makes rotating them interesting)
They are very grippy (good when wheeling)
They are soft (not good for longevity)
They are 2 ply sides (at least they were when we ran them about 6 years ago).. sides aren't as puncture resistent as others (like BFG)
They start out noisy and get worse over time.
We were getting about 25k miles on them (which for us was about one year). The rears actually wore out faster than the fronts for us.. We have a rear locker which I know makes the tires wear faster... w/out a locker you may get more miles.
here are some old pics I was able to find with our '92 running them (on 15x8 rims)
Dead Link Removed
Dead Link Removed
Dead Link Removed
Explorer Features
Explorer Features
