Haziness8
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- September 5, 2005
- Messages
- 372
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- West Hollywood, CA
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- '98 XLT 2WD
well comparing these two shocks, the only difference i can see is that the 5150s are basically a nicer looking 5100 with a mini resivoire attached to it, oh, and about 35 bucks more. what do you guys think or know? i guess the actual better thing from the 5150 would be that the shock would remain cooler than the 5100 during offroad abuse resulting in better performance. right?
well now, if im converting to a dual shock setting for my front suspension, that would mean dual 5100s would stay even cooler than a single 5150 on each side, resulting in better performance than the 5150. this is all assuming that the only difference between the shocks is that imfamous piggy-back resovoire.
Now, the real ball buster. are the 5150 even worth paying $100 bucks more for dual shock applications than 5100s. if i had dual 5150s, it would keep shocks cooler than the 5100, but do i really need it? dual 5100 shocks would be more than enough i think. My real question is: is their any actual performance gains from the 5100 compared to the 5150 (besides the resovoire)?
well now, if im converting to a dual shock setting for my front suspension, that would mean dual 5100s would stay even cooler than a single 5150 on each side, resulting in better performance than the 5150. this is all assuming that the only difference between the shocks is that imfamous piggy-back resovoire.
Now, the real ball buster. are the 5150 even worth paying $100 bucks more for dual shock applications than 5100s. if i had dual 5150s, it would keep shocks cooler than the 5100, but do i really need it? dual 5100 shocks would be more than enough i think. My real question is: is their any actual performance gains from the 5100 compared to the 5150 (besides the resovoire)?