soloxx
Member
- Joined
- July 15, 2011
- Messages
- 36
- Reaction score
- 3
- City, State
- Arlington, VT
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 2017 Ford Explorer LTD
Thanks for your feedback. Although I didn't make any reference to "non-LED fog lamps" in my criticism. Not do I have a problem with the LED low beams. My complaint is with the reduced safety offered by the high beam halogen bulbs. Perhaps I could have been clearer, but the combination of LED lows with halogen highs seems to me a "cheapening" of the vehicle. Were the Explorer equipped with both LED high and lows I'd have been okay.Wow, people expect so much these days, but don't want to pay for it. Either pick the correct option package(s) or know there are MANY aftermarket options out there. To simply state you'd look somewhere else over non-LED fog lamps boggles my mind.
And as for a willingness to pay up for the technology? I can't imagine what you're inferring by that comment.
I was, in retrospect, remiss in not checking with the forum on the headlight issue before placing my order. But, when I did (in March, or so) the dealer's order sheet made no reference to the type of headlights on the vehicle, only the availability of LED fog lamps. I ordered my '17 with all package options beside the second-row double seats. I assumed (I know) that the headlights used would not have regressed through five model years.
My point was that, considering my driving environment and extensive use of my 2012 Explorer over 62k miles of mostly rural driving, the HID high beams were (most likely) a lifesaver. They certainly helped me avoid 5-6 deer and moose strikes. And, I find Ford's decision to go from HID to (rather than even LED) halogen high beams a cheapening and a reduction in nighttime safety.
Another responder referenced his order sheet that stipulated the lighting combination on the Limited. As an aside, I'm looking at the order sheet and copy of the online build from March (a '16) and neither make mention of the headlight combination used. Of course neither make mention of any number of other features, as well (And the EcoBoost was then still a $995 option).
As another forum responder wrote; "buyer beware". Of course, I could have saved myself some aggravation by visiting the Forum (hadn't for a couple of years). But, I didn't. My loss. My '17 Limited certainly has some nice safety upgrades over my 2012, with it's lane-keeping assist and forward-facing camera. But, for the $6k difference between my 2012 and 2017.....well, lets just call it a bit of postpartum depression.
Thanks for everyone's feedback and remedies.