K&N Air Filter vs Air Charger | Ford Explorer Forums

  • Register Today It's free!

K&N Air Filter vs Air Charger

SanDiegoExplr

Well-Known Member
Joined
November 22, 2001
Messages
129
Reaction score
0
City, State
San Diego, California
Year, Model & Trim Level
'97 XLT
Hey all-

Im interested in your guys' opinions on which i should install on my 97 explorer XLT 4.0L SOHC. I want to install either the K&N Air filter or the Air charger. Price doesnt matter. I just want to know what would be better and why. Thx.
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





I got a K&N drop-in. It works pretty well in my Ex.
 






I like the KN filtercharger on my "97 XLT SOHC. Seems more powerful & responsive & sounds great when you step on it. Warning: your m.p.g. may decrease as you put your pedal to metal just to experience it. ;)
 












K&N meets California Air Resources Board (CARB) rules. Don't know about KKM. Don't want to mess with smog issues in California.
 






What about the K&N Fuel Injection Performance Kits (FIPK)? Has anyone installed one of these? How does it run? If price doesnt matter...which one is better and why?
 






I have the FIPK on my '97 SOHC. The one-time $75 extra over the KKM was worth not having to remove and replace it every year for emmissions checks. If you don't mind removing and replacing it every year then the KKM and FIPK perform about the same (probably exactly the same). It takes about 15 minutes to take it out or put it back in.
 






Featured Content

Back
Top