Vortech MAF question

[MadMike6786]

i have a 98 sport 4.0 SOHC i been itching for a new MAF. i went to summit racing to look around and found it but the ending year on there MAF is 94. it looks like it would be completly compatible with my set up. its just a houseing not the sensor.

my question is has any one bought one or know that it will work on a 98?

 

[MONMIX]

I have the PRO-M.
They have gone out of business but I think you can find one once in a blue moon.
Doug over at BAMAChips.com has one that has gotten favorable reviews.

The electronics on the PRO-M MAS, are less than stellar.

 

[jah81592]

Go with a C&L meter 73mm for a 94-5 Mustang with a sample tube for 19# inj. Works well.

 

[spindlecone]

I have the PRO-M.
They have gone out of business but I think you can find one once in a blue moon.
Doug over at BAMAChips.com has one that has gotten favorable reviews.

The electronics on the PRO-M MAS, are less than stellar.

How do you conclude that the electronics are less than stellar in the Pro-M Monmix, got any details?

 

[MadMike6786]

i cant use C&L it wont work with my set up... all i want is a houseing like vortech offers i really dont want to drop 250 on pro m... if all else fails im going to have my dad machine my already MAF bigger =D

 

[aldive]

i cant use C&L it wont work with my set up... all i want is a houseing like vortech offers i really dont want to drop 250 on pro m... if all else fails im going to have my dad machine my already MAF bigger =D

Why can't you use the C & L?

 

[MONMIX]

How do you conclude that the electronics are less than stellar in the Pro-M Monmix, got any details?

Well, as you know I have never dynoed my Ex so right there any thing I say seems to be flawed .

For the money I spent on the Pro-M the end result was not impressive.
If DID smooth the idle slightly, but yielded little seat of the pants results.

No facts, no fingures, no numbers just an honest mans educated opinion.

 

[spindlecone]

Well, as you know I have never dynoed my Ex so right there any thing I say seems to be flawed .

For the money I spent on the Pro-M the end result was not impressive.
If DID smooth the idle slightly, but yielded little seat of the pants results.

No facts, no fingures, no numbers just an honest mans educated opinion.

Nothing is flawed Monimix, pro-m is a stage three upgrade, IMO, a few ponys at most, not something that everyone should do.
I thank you for your honest opinion, means alot.

 

[aldive]

And remember Kevin, Doug and I did dyno YOUR Pro M and got less than stellar results.

http://webpages.charter.net/doug904/4-9-05 Dyno Runs/Al Franklin 99 Explorer/pro-mbaseline.jpg

http://webpages.charter.net/doug904/4-9-05 Dyno Runs/Al Franklin 99 Explorer/pro-madj1.jpg

 

[MONMIX]

Nothing is flawed Monimix, .

You have never looked at my check book then have you

 

[MadMike6786]

aldive this is why http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=143905

 

[aldive]

aldive this is why http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=143905

?