BillyBob82
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- November 20, 2007
- Messages
- 152
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- The sick trails of Boston, MA
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 92 XLT 4x4
u plan on doing mods to the vette and how much mileage in it it looks mint conditon for that year
I'd like to leave it close to stock, maybe exhaust and intake down the road. No plans for forced induction or a bottle. Both the Contour and the Vette have almost exactly 100k miles. It's in decent shape, for its age and miles, but I did buy a two year power train warranty for it just in case.
#### no I would not make that trade. vettes suck in my book because you invest the same amt of cash into a stang, look better, be faster, and handle better that a vette. factual for the most part, except for the look better part. that's an opinion.
:scratch: hmmm, you lost me there. along the lines of what froader was saying, cars are all personal preference and if you think the stang is the better looking car, you won't hear an argument from me. your "factual" claims about which car is faster are way off though. Mid ninties corvettes and mustangs weigh about the same, but the mustang has always been underpowered. my car came with 300 horse from the factory whereas the mustang had 220-230 horse. As far as handling goes, I'm pretty sure the vette bests the mustang again. i took a snip of a quote about my generation vette from this site http://www.web-cars.com/corvette/1984-4.php "Handling was one of the primary goals during the development of the C4. Corvette engineers were obsessed with it. All the usual methods for making the Corvette the best handling car available were tried and a few new ones were developed". not trying to pick a fight here, i'm just trying to figure out what you are basing your "factual" claims on.