Cool car but why'd you choose the CX-5 over the Excape if you have the Z-plan?
I was driving the Explorer for my commute too but a couple months ago traded in my wife's Taurus for a '12 Focus SEL for me and gave her the Explorer to haul the kids around. Now I went from 17mpg to 32mpg on my commute and she went from around 21 in the Taurus to maybe 16 in the Explorer. Overall though we're doing our part for the envronment!![]()
The net price savings for 2013 Escape might be about $3K for loaded versions of each, even with my discounts. Ford's prices are so inflated. Driving wise, I think the 1.6L turbo Escape will compare very nicely with 2.0L Mazda Skytech, both are driver's-oriented SUVs.
Explorer consistently got 15mpg, CX-5 gets 26mpg, both on Chevron regular gas for comparison. Both vehicles have top safety ratings by IIHS, but no doubt the 5000 pound Explorer is safest for those that crash.
Oh yeah, the CX-5 I'm sure is a great driving CUV. Good choice. Yeah the Focus I bought stickered for $23k - it's a great, solid little car but that's a lot of dough for a compact car. Some folks are buying $28k Titaniums. That's why they've had to have a $2k rebate to move them for the last 3 months. I got almost $5k off sticker on mine. Good luck!
Thanks.
Yes, you listed some good examples of Ford pricing, it takes huge discounts to move the metal. The MSRPs are so jacked-up. $50K Explorers and $36K Escapes, no way. Not to mention the whole stupid Lincoln product line.
Well, relatively speaking, the vast improvement in the '12 Focus over the previous generation is worth every addtional penny. It's probably the best handling and quietest non-luxury compact car out there. I expect the Escape will be similar. They're definitely trying to move upmarket.
Agreed, I think the Escape will be up with the best in class. The Explorer is certainly very much improved and very refined, I've driven the '12.
Quality/reliabiltiy is another issue, and Ford is nowhere near best in class.
But separately I think the Ford MSRP's are so jacked-up that nearly everybody expects and gets huge discounts. It's a business practice that probably won't change soon. Depreciation is still TBD, but you can probably guess...
Certain models like the Fusion are doing quite well in the Consumer Reports reliability ratings.
I haven't done an apples to apples comparison but I'm not so sure Ford's MSRP's are so inflated over others. The Equinox / Terrain are also very pricey and I'm guessing the CR-V / Rav 4 are as well. I've read Ford won't have to discount so much once the Fusion and Escape are updated this year and buyers walking into the showroom will no longer have such a cheap alternative to the Focus.
Yes, it's a short list of Fords with above average reliability and the Fusion is certainly excellent. I don't buy into the notion that new product launches have to have below average reliability in the first production year, which unfortunately the 2011 Explorer has gone down that path. Too many other new product launches have gone well because the reliabilty and durability testing was done right.
Pricing-wise I hope Ford can get a grip. But I noticed the new Escape MSRP loaded was about $35K (using Ford's prelim pricing website) which is considerably higher than equivalent CX-5 or CRV (over 10% higher), not a good sign.
Hmmmm, I don't know about that. Just quickly built a CRV with every conceivable option and it came to $38,521. Also built an Escape with every option box checked and came up to $37,495. AND the Escape includes a panorama roof, self-parking package and the Ecoboost engine. As far as I can tell the CRV includes none of that and has only the measly 185-hp engine. Looks like the Escape is the much better value.
Wow- that 2013 Escape is NOT cheap!
Our loaded 2012 Escape sold for $29k and I think the only options we didn't get are the V6, and the navigation. I'd never pay $37k+ for an Escape. No way. No freakin' way. I was not happy about paying $29k for ours. (I am Z-plan)