Live Free or Die
Member
- Joined
- August 27, 2010
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- Keene, NH
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 2000 Ranger and Explorer
Hey everybody,
<rant>
The Explorer Forum was nice enough to send me a "Happy Birthday" email. Although that message was automated, I appreciate it. It was a much better gift than I received from the "Live Free or Die" "State of New Hampshire".
For my birthday, I received a $150 invoice for vehicle registration, and I had to go get my truck inspected, yay! (I don't know why, but NH makes everything expire on your birthday: Drivers License, Vehicle Registration, Inspection Sticker, CCW Permit, etc.) I guess it's the gubmint's way of saying "Happy Birthday".
So, yesterday, I went over everything on my truck, check the suspension, lights, horn, etc. make sure there are no surprises when I went to go get my inspection sticker and Took my tools out of my truck so theres nothing to steal.
Side note to my rant: If you live in NH, ask your state rep's to support HB540, to make inspections every 2 years, instead of every year.
</rant>
Well... Surprise! My Explorer failed inspection!
When I bought this truck, It came with running boards. Which I found annoying and took off, when I took them off, there was a ton of rust on the rocker panels where they were bolted on. They are saying that the rocker panels lost structural integrity because of the rust, and that if they just weld some sheet metal over it, it will magically pass inspection.
Sounds all sounds like major league bullshit to me:
First of all, the Explorer is a Body-On-Frame truck. The strength of the vehicle comes from it's well built chassis. Not the sheet metal body panels.
If the rocker panels had any structural significance, don't you think Ford would have made them out of something thicker than <1/8" sheet metal?
Third: Last year, I got my truck inspected at the same place, just after I took the running boards off my truck, the same amount of rust was there last time.
So, am I wrong to believe that the rocker panels have very little structural significance to worry about?
<rant>
The Explorer Forum was nice enough to send me a "Happy Birthday" email. Although that message was automated, I appreciate it. It was a much better gift than I received from the "Live Free or Die" "State of New Hampshire".
For my birthday, I received a $150 invoice for vehicle registration, and I had to go get my truck inspected, yay! (I don't know why, but NH makes everything expire on your birthday: Drivers License, Vehicle Registration, Inspection Sticker, CCW Permit, etc.) I guess it's the gubmint's way of saying "Happy Birthday".
So, yesterday, I went over everything on my truck, check the suspension, lights, horn, etc. make sure there are no surprises when I went to go get my inspection sticker and Took my tools out of my truck so theres nothing to steal.
Side note to my rant: If you live in NH, ask your state rep's to support HB540, to make inspections every 2 years, instead of every year.
</rant>
Well... Surprise! My Explorer failed inspection!
When I bought this truck, It came with running boards. Which I found annoying and took off, when I took them off, there was a ton of rust on the rocker panels where they were bolted on. They are saying that the rocker panels lost structural integrity because of the rust, and that if they just weld some sheet metal over it, it will magically pass inspection.
Sounds all sounds like major league bullshit to me:
First of all, the Explorer is a Body-On-Frame truck. The strength of the vehicle comes from it's well built chassis. Not the sheet metal body panels.
If the rocker panels had any structural significance, don't you think Ford would have made them out of something thicker than <1/8" sheet metal?
Third: Last year, I got my truck inspected at the same place, just after I took the running boards off my truck, the same amount of rust was there last time.
So, am I wrong to believe that the rocker panels have very little structural significance to worry about?