mickeyaaaa
Member
- Joined
- September 25, 2020
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 8
- City, State
- Red deer
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 2009 Explorer Limited AWD
I've had my 09 limited for a few years now. found a great deal on ebay for a case of Purolator TL22500 (oem FL-500s Equivalent) and just installed one the other day.
Just wondering if others have made the switch and found any problems/issues? not really worried but thought I'd check on the forum here...
FL820 is the oem recommended filter, the FL-500 is for newer engines. The FL-500 is slightly smaller diameter, has lower bypass pressure rating, and about 9% lower maximum flow rate - not the kind of flow you see in normal driving anyways.. not worried about cold starts as the lower bypass ensures oil will flow.
FL500s vs FL-820:
10-12GPM max vs 11-13gpm
8psi bypass vs 16psi
170 sq inch vs 250 sq inch filter area
96.5% efficiency at 20 microns vs 99%
I've read up as much as I could find online regarding these 2 filters, and found out quick lube shops are often subbing in the FL500 equivalent on the 4.6 just to keep inventory down. Mustang performance guys generally say use the 820 if it will fit but for tight spaces the 500 is perfectly acceptable (oil coolers often in the way on some models).
Given the apparent low risk from all I could find online, and better availability of the FL-500, I thinks its worth a try.... but if you have a horror story you can attribute to using this filter spec on this engine, I'm all ears. Otherwise I'll be happy to be a lab test rat and report back in a year or 2 if I suffer any oil starvation engine issues.
Just wondering if others have made the switch and found any problems/issues? not really worried but thought I'd check on the forum here...
FL820 is the oem recommended filter, the FL-500 is for newer engines. The FL-500 is slightly smaller diameter, has lower bypass pressure rating, and about 9% lower maximum flow rate - not the kind of flow you see in normal driving anyways.. not worried about cold starts as the lower bypass ensures oil will flow.
FL500s vs FL-820:
10-12GPM max vs 11-13gpm
8psi bypass vs 16psi
170 sq inch vs 250 sq inch filter area
96.5% efficiency at 20 microns vs 99%
I've read up as much as I could find online regarding these 2 filters, and found out quick lube shops are often subbing in the FL500 equivalent on the 4.6 just to keep inventory down. Mustang performance guys generally say use the 820 if it will fit but for tight spaces the 500 is perfectly acceptable (oil coolers often in the way on some models).
Given the apparent low risk from all I could find online, and better availability of the FL-500, I thinks its worth a try.... but if you have a horror story you can attribute to using this filter spec on this engine, I'm all ears. Otherwise I'll be happy to be a lab test rat and report back in a year or 2 if I suffer any oil starvation engine issues.