for V8 - dual vs single exhaust ? headers ? high flow cats ? | Page 3 | Ford Explorer Forums

  • Register Today It's free!

for V8 - dual vs single exhaust ? headers ? high flow cats ?

Kudos!

IZwack, you sre my hero!!!

I paid my dues, in cash and hours spent in boring engineering classes. I'm sick and tired of people with the gall to use aggression and BS to disrespect those of us who made the effort to learn the straight dope. Seeing you cut that jerk down to size made my day!!!

Thank you!
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





Don isn't a jerk.
Posted via Mobile Device
 






Yeah he's not a jerk - just has a different perspective on things. I respect him for what he knows, and he knows a lot of things. But like with some things you hear from people, you kind of have to take them with a grain of salt and see whether or not they are indeed correct. And normally I wouldn't even bother arguing with people since it doesnt really benefit me and their projects or things that they work on don't typically affect my day-to-day life. But this is a forum that is viewed by a large audience so I think it's important that we get the fundamentals correct - and hopefully, as NotATruckGuy alludes to, supported by science and math (because at the end of the day, equations have the power to reveal the obvious of how systems can be further improved).
 






Yeah he's not a jerk - just has a different perspective on things. I respect him for what he knows, and he knows a lot of things. But like with some things you hear from people, you kind of have to take them with a grain of salt and see whether or not they are indeed correct. And normally I wouldn't even bother arguing with people since it doesnt really benefit me and their projects or things that they work on don't typically affect my day-to-day life. But this is a forum that is viewed by a large audience so I think it's important that we get the fundamentals correct - and hopefully, as NotATruckGuy alludes to, supported by science and math (because at the end of the day, equations have the power to reveal the obvious of how systems can be further improved)

SO?? Verdict?? Should I go to 2.5" pipes after my glasspacks? I have the TMH's and 1.7 full roller rockers, all 4 cats are Magnaflows. Should I retune?
 






The verdict is you have to find out for yourself ;) I kid I kid.

But really, I think the most we can do is take guesses since we dont even know all of the input parameters. So having said that, if the glasspack has an input tube diameter of 2.5", then 2.5" would make sense for the output tube for general driving.
 






Re: Science and Math

...This is a forum that is viewed by a large audience so I think it's important that we get the fundamentals correct - and hopefully ... supported by science and math (because at the end of the day, equations have the power to reveal the obvious of how systems can be further improved).
Well said! I also believe that we must be mindful of a larger audience, and to be true to them and the best version of the truth that we can muster, if we are to make progress as a group. Likewise, precise, topical and respectful language is the best vehicle to convey this scientific knowledge, at least IMO. ;)
 






Question

SO?? Verdict?? Should I go to 2.5" pipes after my glasspacks? I have the TMH's and 1.7 full roller rockers, all 4 cats are Magnaflows. Should I retune?
I'm confused, your specs say that you're running a '97 5.0, but we're in the '07+ forum. Can you clarify what vehicle you're referring to?

If it's a 5.0 with plenty of flow, then 2.5" pipes that far back should be no problem. But if it's a 4.6, especially the 2-valve version, then things are quite different.

Need more info, please!
 






I'm confused, your specs say that you're running a '97 5.0, but we're in the '07+ forum. Can you clarify what vehicle you're referring to?

If it's a 5.0 with plenty of flow, then 2.5" pipes that far back should be no problem. But if it's a 4.6, especially the 2-valve version, then things are quite different.

Need more info, please!

AL my stats are... 5.0 with 1.7 full roller rockers, TMH's, Magnaflow HI-flow cats in ALL 4 spots, custom K&N Air cleaner(14"X6" I believe), no Computer upgrades..YET! 2 glasspacks out the corners.
 






AL my stats are... 5.0 with 1.7 full roller rockers, TMH's, Magnaflow HI-flow cats in ALL 4 spots, custom K&N Air cleaner(14"X6" I believe), no Computer upgrades..YET! 2 glasspacks out the corners.
So you do have a pre-2006 Sport Track, then. Correct?

If so you might get better advice in the 2001-2005 Explorer Sport Trac forum. From what I've seen, the mods tend to move posts into the correct forum when they find them, but you don't need to wait for them to find yours.

Let's review: As we all know, a gasoline engine is essentially a big, self-sustaining air pump. The main influence on how much air a motor of a given displacement can pump is the heads. A good engine builder almost always builds around the heads. If you know enough parameters about the motor, you can use fluid dynamics equations to calculate roughly what you can do to optimize the power vs. RPM curve to suit your purposes. But it takes a lot more parameters than you have given so far.

Because you've already built most of your system, you might as well go on to getting your ST on a dyno and work on your air/fuel mapping, spark curves etc. Your results might indicate that you should scrap the existing intake and/or exhaust system(s). A good engine tuner isn't going to give away many secrets, so if yours says you should do this or that, you can trust the advice or not. You might not get all you can get if you choose not to make changes; you'll have to figure out which will cost more, the price of tuning or the price of buying the parts that the tuner says you should have. Set a budget.

It looks to me like you already have a complete engine, from air cleaner to exhaust tips. Because you're asking, I can conclude that you'll need help with getting beyond this point. My advice is first to take your question to the 2001-2005 area, and then ask around about finding a good chassis dyno facility and engine tuner who specializes in your type of EFI motor, within a reasonable distance from where you live.

Good luck!
 






That may be a perfect example there. If your truck was running anywhere on the lean side before the exhaust work, it became more lean afterwords. Your issue would not be the mufflers, but the resulting A/F ratio due to the higher airflow out of the engine.

From the ideal lean A/F ratio at any given time, altering the airflow will produce less power at that time. Pushing the A/F either way then needs more or less fuel to restore the A/F ratio. PCM Tuners can see that in real time when they monitor a wide band O2 sensor.

I hope that as time passes it becomes very common to reprogram the PCM for common modifications.

quick question have a 2002 v8 just got a k&n and getting fm50 with 2.5 inch pipes single. After thats done am i going to have to change the A/F ratio? if so how much does it cost and where would i go to do that?
 






Wow, i registered just to reply to Don.

Don, you sound like the biggest ricer on the forum. You tell the educated engineer to be clear in his statements, yet you offer the most generic, ill-inforrmed "answers" Ive ever seen on an auto enthusiast forum. Common sense would NOT lead people to believe that "bigger is not always better" means "buy smaller parts." who the hell do you associate with that would come to that conclusion? The first statement does not equal the second, EVER. You sound like a 16 yr old boy racer who just got his first car. Whether you are or not is irrelevant. You clearly should not be imposing your "knowledge" onto others. If you cant accept that what you thought you knew has been proven wrong by others that are clearly more educated than you on a variety of subjects that pertain to this discussion, then you shouldnt join the discussion. Generally, people that come out and say things like "i do know more" and "youre just ignorant" are the most misled, full of bs people in the discussion. By the way, there are factors other than pipe
size and tuning that affect hp/tq. In this game, NOTHING is always a given. Stop making ridiculous, generic statements that make you look like a nowitall newbie.
 






NOTHING is always a given. Stop making ridiculous, generic statements that make you look like a nowitall newbie.

it's "know it all" :D

I know on my 03 Cobra motor at 500 rear wheel horsepower adding headers was pretty much a waste. The stock log style manifolds worked perfecty fine with a 2.5 in mid pipe high flow cats and 2.5 in mandrel bent tubing. All these guys kepts wanting 3in exhaust and headers which just didn't help much at all unless they got over 600 rear wheel horsepower. I doubt many of these sport tracs are shootng for those numbers. Difference is though those cars are supercharged by a positive displacement blower. So on our trucks with no power adder would they should benefit from any types of after market exhaust once tuned properly correct ? I really want to dual my trruck out with some custom cut up +05 Mustang take off exhaust. I'd go with headers but to my knowledge there aren't any longtubes for the +07 V8 ST's :thumbdwn:

anyway the point of the thread was to compare the stock single exhaust or any aftermarket single exhaust for these trucks to a custom dual set up. I just wondered if converting to duals was worth it powerwise for the money.

Also it has been my expierence that making several changes to a car that the ECU can only do so much with 02 sensors, MAF, TPS, etc... at some point it has to be custom tuned to get the a/f right unless you dont't mind running on the ragged edge with a possible bad lean condition. I do agree that most vehicles wont see the full beneft of mods including exhaust done with out custom dyno tuning. I've had several Mustangs and a Ford truck dyno tuned. All ran better and picked up a good amount of power and the a/f ratios were dead on and safe for the engine.
 






it's "know it all" :D

I know on my 03 Cobra motor at 500 rear wheel horsepower adding headers was pretty much a waste. The stock log style manifolds worked perfecty fine with a 2.5 in mid pipe high flow cats and 2.5 in mandrel bent tubing. All these guys kepts wanting 3in exhaust and headers which just didn't help much at all unless they got over 600 rear wheel horsepower. I doubt many of these sport tracs are shootng for those numbers. Difference is though those cars are supercharged by a positive displacement blower. So on our trucks with no power adder would they should benefit from any types of after market exhaust once tuned properly correct ? I really want to dual my trruck out with some custom cut up +05 Mustang take off exhaust. I'd go with headers but to my knowledge there aren't any longtubes for the +07 V8 ST's :thumbdwn:

anyway the point of the thread was to compare the stock single exhaust or any aftermarket single exhaust for these trucks to a custom dual set up. I just wondered if converting to duals was worth it powerwise for the money.

Also it has been my expierence that making several changes to a car that the ECU can only do so much with 02 sensors, MAF, TPS, etc... at some point it has to be custom tuned to get the a/f right unless you dont't mind running on the ragged edge with a possible bad lean condition. I do agree that most vehicles wont see the full beneft of mods including exhaust done with out custom dyno tuning. I've had several Mustangs and a Ford truck dyno tuned. All ran better and picked up a good amount of power and the a/f ratios were dead on and safe for the engine.


Yea I was on my iphone. I figured I'd mispelled a few words, oh well.

You are correct for the most part. It all depends on the vehicle. On my 04 Mach 1, my car picked up 10 rwhp alone from going to new Kooks long tubes from dented, worn out Hooker long tubes. The total gain from long tubes on that car was in the 20-25 rwhp range. I'm betting the higher compression motor had a lot to do with it.

However, on my 01 Lightning w/ 14#, I gained 12 rwhp at most going to long tubes with high flows and a tune. I bet the tune contributed to half of that gain.

I don't know a whole lot about this truck yet, as I haven't even picked mine up yet. I've been research and am currently working a deal on an 08 limited CPO w/ the v8. There's absolutely NO reason for this truck to have more than a 2.5" exhaust. There DEFINITELY is too much for this truck, especially with an otherwise stock motor. In fact, I'd be willing to bet that when going duals, it would benefit more from a 2.25" pipe, unless the duals is only after the muffler. There's a reason Ford went with single for this truck, and it isn't all for the purpose of keeping the decibels down. Does anyone know what the compression is compared to the motors in the Mustang? If this truck had the EXACT motor that was in the Mustang, then it would definitely benefit from a dual exhaust. It's like the hard core s2000 guys that go from duals to a single exhaust, because it makes slightly more hp AND tq, compared to aftermarket duals. There is something about this motor that makes it benefit from the single exhaust, performance-wise. It would not have taken more effort than lifting a finger for a Ford engineer to get dual exhaust on the truck, if they saw the benefit.

BTW, MOST vehicles certainly would benefit from an aftermarket tune. But like I said earlier, that's not ALWAYS true for an otherwise bone stock vehicle. It seems like I read somewhere that this truck runs on regular fuel, is that correct? If so, the truck would definitely benefit from a 93 octane tune along with a little exhaust work. I guarantee the truck does not need headers. I'm betting the ability to use regular fuel means the compression is lower in this truck than the Mustang. All of these factors contribute to why this truck won't see the same kind of gains that the similar motor'd Mustang does with the same mods. It seems to me that the only similarity between the two is the size of the motor. Ford has had what, 6-7 different 4.6's, none of which were the same at all internally?

That said, can a 3V Mustang upper intake manifold be swapped onto these, or is there a hood clearance issue? I bet a stock manifold can be had pretty cheap. Also, I'm wondering if this truck would see better all around performance from a 4V mach 1 motor compared to the F150 3V 5.4. It's lighter, revs higher, and will respond to mods better, short of a blower/turbo. Less weight in the front will keep the handling in check, and will also take less effort to get the truck moving = less strain on drivetrain.
 






01 SVTL Ford should have stuck with the plan of putting a 03-04 Cobra motor in these trucks, or at least the Addrenalin version. I would have spent the extra money for that one :). Wouold be interesting to see a mustang intake manifold swapped onto a sport trac if they are in fact any different ???? I was a 2V nut with my 708 RWHP 2000 GT then a 4V nut with my 98 Cobra with blown 04 engine, but 3V's are new to me. I think Ford used single exhaust to save build cost and ease of exhaust design with the IRS. Or quietness, or emmisions there's a reason for it and it wasn't a good one for performance reasons. I want to put a stock take off +05 mustang exhaust on my truck. I'd be happy if it sounded like a stock +05. If it's too quiet I'd want to go with a x pipe and Magnaflow mufflers (the quieter ones).

would sound like this truck in the link below with Magnaflow duals but a little more exotic smooth sound with the addition of an x section
http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2540104&postcount=17
 






That does sound good. Do you know which mufflers he used? Did he delete the cats too?

I'm not positive the intake manifold is different, but I know I read it somewhere on this site. Is there a site dedicated to the sport trac that has a more performance-based following?

If these motors are the same, then the truck should benefit a little here and there from things like throttle bodies, high flows, gears, tune, etc. I'm not too savy on the 3V either. If I can find out how similar they are, I'm sure I'll spend a little more time on a s197 forum looking for used parts. Until then, time to scour the SVT forums for a set of 4.30's and a nice set of slightly used mufflers.
 






those are magnaflows but not crossover pipe at all just straight duals. That's why if it were me I would put in a x section. You should look at his thread he's the only guy I know that found an exhaust shop that was able to route 2 set of tail pipes through the IRS and around the spare tire. He has some pics that shows how it was done.
 






I understand they are Maggy's, but which ones? Magnapacks or the oval type? There's probably 2-3 different Magnaflow mufflers made for the Mustang, and even more if he just randomly picked one.

Any good exhaust shop should be able to do something like that. I had a custom, manifold-back setup created for my Lightning (trual duals from the factory), including two mufflers that were actually made for a Mustang, and a universal X that I found on Ebay for $40. I've had 5 different Lightnings, and this one by far sounded the best out of all of them, even with stock manifolds. It took all of an hour for him to "eyeball" it, bend the piping, and weld it up. Granted, he's been doing it for 25 years, but like I said, any GOOD exhaust shop shouldn't have a problem with it. It's just time-consuming. Try to locate one that is known for working on hot-rods in the area. The one I went to in Houston had been servicing the different car clubs for many years and came highly recommended. It wasn't mandrel bent, so it may not flow JUST like a true aftermarket system, but he only makes the bend ONCE, and there was no cutting/hack job involved. There was a tremendous amount of improvement compared to the hackjob I had removed.

I'm thinking I may use the same mufflers here, and get a set of high flows for now. Any idea how many "cats" and "precats" are on this thing? I'm guessing since it's single, there's one small "precat" and a bigger "cat?"

Also, I do like the quad tip the guy in that vid has, but I'm not fond of exhaust tips being placed where they weren't intended (like the guys that go dual tips on a v6 Mustang, it just doesn't look right, and it's too obvious that it isn't OEM, to enthusiasts anyway) Has anyone had their exhaust dumped right behind the rear bumper, so that you can't see the tailpipes at all? That stock, OEM carbon steel single tail pipe looks ridiculous coming out of the rear side of these trucks the way it does from the factory, and honestly, even a stainless aftermarket tip exiting the same way doesn't look much better.
 






I think it's the same larger round can looking cat like the newer stangs.

the pics of his set up it looks like the regular magnaflow mufflers. Look at that link and you can ask him he posts on here. I'm sure he'll be happy to tell you.

what muffler shop in houston did that for you ? where is it ? I'm in and out of Houston several times per week.

man I love lightnings I had a 2003 Harley clone and Harley Blown F150 crew cab. 400 RWHP and 500 RWTQ tuned by Houston Performance. That was fun but when gas prices spiked it was my daily driver and was killing me on gas cost. Just going to tinker with this truck some and finish restoring my 1968 Stang with a n/a 408 :)
 






Ah, I'll try to find the pics again. The fist time I looked at them I was on my phone, so I don't recall seeing any pics of the mufflers.

Man, I can't for the life of me remember the name of the exhaust shop now. The sign was so ****ty, that I just looked for the shop once I got on the road. It's in Northwest houston off of I10. When I get some time later, I'll look at a map. It was only about 15 minutes from where I worked, but I didn't live on that side of town so I wasn't real familiar with the area.

Agreed on the Lightnings. GREAT trucks! If I didn't need a back seat, and could get decent financing on an 04 with low miles, I'd buy another one and keep it forever this time. Aside from MPG, they are the perfect daily driver to me, which is why I kept going back to them every time I tried to get away from them for something with better MPG. I had a fully built, (stage 3 heads and cams) 01 2 summers ago when premium fuel went to 4.65/gallon where I was. I was fresh out of college, living on a limited budget, and driving back to College Station to see my girlfriend every other weekend, and had no choice but to sell it. Ironically, the WEEK after I sold it is when gas dropped back to about 3.50-3.60/gallon. I was pissed to say the least. Since then, I happened to come across the truck on a wrecked auto-auction site. I heard the kid I sold it to, turned and sold it to a guy that was buying it for his 18 year old son for graduation. It lasted about 2 months. Poor truck, it was beatiful!

Where do you live? Are you on lonestarstangs? Your s/n looks familiar now that I think about it.
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





it's "know it all" :D
Actually Strunk & White's "Elements of Style" prefer the hyphenated "know-it-all". ;) But 01svtL's point holds water regardless, IMHO. I'm accustomed to speaking with professionals, people with post-graduate educations. Rarely do I encounter an engineer, lawyer or physician who is openly intolerant of lesser-educated people's language as long as it is respectful. Nor do they rant and rave themselves, unless they're going through a nervous breakdown. :p:

All these guys kepts wanting 3in exhaust and headers which just didn't help much at all unless they got over 600 rear wheel horsepower. I doubt many of these sport tracs are shootng for those numbers.
I'm editing a bit out to keep my post small. Your point is valid. A 4.6 N/A motor simply can't saturate a 2x3" exhaust. For practical reasons, putting on larger than necessary pipes is a detriment; it causes clearance issues, the cats are slower to light off (I believe in keeping pollution controls active), and even the exhaust note can sound worse. Like those ricer cars where they try to get a basso profondo exhaust note out of a tiny motor that simply doesn't make fundamental frequencies below a couple hundred Hz.

The Ford 4.6 has a very nice tenor voice that can rival Italian supercars in going from a mid-bass wail to a high-RPM scream. IMHO trying to get sonorous big block tones out of it is nearly as bad as ricer fart pipes.

anyway the point of the thread was to compare the stock single exhaust or any aftermarket single exhaust for these trucks to a custom dual set up. I just wondered if converting to duals was worth it powerwise for the money.
I'm about to find out. I think that if the stock crossover pipe is replaced with a design that allows both cylinder banks to have similar flow rates (ie. one bank isn't overly restricted), that it makes little difference whether the rest is single or dual, as long as the aggregate flow rate is supported. However, I'd prefer dual because two smaller pipes can be tucked up and out of the way easier than a single large pipe. Also, the sound of keeping the two banks of a V-8 separate is unique and I like it. :cool:
 






Featured Content

Back
Top