Not to resurrect an old thread..but...I was reading through this and something doesn't seem quite right.
A large number of folks keep claiming that the "SOHC motor is far more efficient than the OHV". I have a hard time believing that. The EPA ratings for the OHV motor are actually higher than the SOHC, and the SOHC has three or four timing chains (optional balance shaft chain) to spin, thus a lot of rotational loss. The OHV has a single chain.
Even ignoring EPA ratings, the SOHC has a slightly higher compression ratio (9.4 compared to 9.0, IIRC) but that wouldn't yield 20-30% improvements in fuel economy. Maybe a couple percent, but I think this would be offset by rotating losses in the valvetrain.
I had a 2000 Sport with the OHV, 5-speed manual, 3.27 gears, 2WD, 35 psi tires, synthetic oils all throughout, custom lower air dam, and SCT tune. Basically an Explorer set up to get good mileage. I could get 23-24 mpg on the highway at 65 mph, which i felt was quite good. 30+ mpg with a heavier 4 door, automatic, 3.55 gears just doesn't seem possible.