Replaced 97 Sport Monoleaf w Junkyard 4 leaf
I replaced my 97 Sport's mono-leaf rear springs with a set out of a later model year 4 door I found at the salvage yard. Appears the rear end in these things is a popular item, there were several Explorers at the salvage yard with the rear axles already pulled, made grabbing a set of springs about a 10 minute job for me. I got springs out from under a V8 model thinking they'd be the heaviest capacity. They would have been a direct swap for the mono-leafs in my 2 door, but I did some measuring and it appears that the 4 leaf pack was about 5/8" thinner than my original monoleaf pack which had four 5/8" spacers and a 3/4" main (only) spring. I decided not to try to figure out why my old spring pack and the 4 door one were different overall thicknesses and just added one of the spacers to the 4 leaf pack (whcih I am 100% convinced does nothing to help the ride height, I think they used the spacers so the U-bolts and shocks they put under the 2 and 4 door models could be the same). The studs from the junkyard 4 leaf pack would have been long enough to accept the spacer, but I chewed them up pretty good using a pipe wrench as a backup when I removed the nut from the bottom. New studs at NAPA were only a few bucks each. Also, when I installed the salvage yard springs under my X, I switched them so the pass. side is now on the driver's side and vice versa (to try to help with the gangster lean).
Results: 97 Explorer Sport now sits level front to back and side to side. As far as ride quality goes, I feel like it's as stiff now as it was before (no noticeable change), but it feels more stable when cornering and when I drive over railroad tracks the back doesn't seem to want to jump sideways now either.
If anyone knows why the 4 leaf packs are 5/8" thinner (the thickness of 1 spacer) than the 2 door monoleaf packs, I'd sure like to hear the answer...