mountaineer2004
Elite Explorer
- Joined
- October 28, 2014
- Messages
- 677
- Reaction score
- 231
- City, State
- NYS
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 2004 Mountaineer (AWD V8)
I would trust a good running 200k mile 4.0 sohc with new timing chains better than a reman or rebuilt engine. As long as you keep oil, coolant and timing chains in them they will run for 500k miles. I have torn a ton of these engines apart and the minimal wear I have found with 200k on them makes me a believer. I have seen them sludged up with 135k on them too.
I have a 2004 Mountaineer (original owner), that I'm planning on keeping long-term. It has 125k on it, and only recently I heard the timing chain rattle on start-up for the first time.
I drive about 300 miles a week now, so I know the engine still has lots of time, but eventually it'll need work on the chain assembly. I'd love to keep my engine, because it's been well maintained, with oil/filter changes every 5k tops, but I'm really worried about an experience like the OP.
I always figured a rebuild, while more money, was a sure way to avoid trouble. You're the first guy I've heard say go rebuild over reman, regardless of the $$$ question. Now I'm confused. Shouldn't a factory reman be better than a dealer rebuild?
PS--my dealer is All American, in Kingston...yup, same group!