BackBone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- December 21, 2012
- Messages
- 180
- Reaction score
- 3
- City, State
- Redlands, CA
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1997 Mercury Mountaineer
-
Performance Upgrades - Maintenance - Modifications - Problem Solving - Off-Road - Street Trucks.
Covering the Explorer, ST, Sport, Lincoln Aviator, Sport Trac,
Mercury Mountaineer, Mazda Navajo, Ford Ranger, Mazda Pickups, and the Aerostar.
Featuring H.I. - Human Intelligence.
Register Today It's free!
32's TT, Shackles - no body lift...
- Thread starter BackBone
- Start date
BackBone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- December 21, 2012
- Messages
- 180
- Reaction score
- 3
- City, State
- Redlands, CA
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1997 Mercury Mountaineer
Decided to add pics 
Front:
Rear:
More shots:
Nerf bars back on so shorties can get in:
Bad pic
The answer is YES!! And I did not have to trim and have the nerfbars on with NO RUBBING AT ALL!!! I just used the stock rims.
Front:
Rear:
More shots:
Nerf bars back on so shorties can get in:
Bad pic
The answer is YES!! And I did not have to trim and have the nerfbars on with NO RUBBING AT ALL!!! I just used the stock rims.
BackBone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- December 21, 2012
- Messages
- 180
- Reaction score
- 3
- City, State
- Redlands, CA
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1997 Mercury Mountaineer
My 31's seem to take more space then your 32's?
I had to trim a little..tt and rear coilovers.
If you look at where the rear of your front tire is in comparison to the nerf bar it appears you have about a half inch more room than I do on mine with the nerf bar. Funny thing is that for certain years guys complain that they rub with 33's even with TT, Shackles, and a 3" body lift! Yet in this thread here: http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=265165&highlight=body+lift this member was able to fit 33's with no body lift!
Featured images
Featured images
