2nd Generation Explorer (and 1st) VS Land Rover - Your Take? | Ford Explorer Forums

  • Register Today It's free!

2nd Generation Explorer (and 1st) VS Land Rover - Your Take?

Metalface

Well-Known Member
Joined
December 25, 2022
Messages
176
Reaction score
109
City, State
East Coast US
Year, Model & Trim Level
1997 Explorer XLT
Someone has said this, just now:

it’s a 97 with 265k miles, and I didn’t say all vehicles, just ford. I should mention the 90s ford explorer doesn’t have the air ride suspension, probably doesn’t have a diff lock, doesn’t have heated leather, doesn’t have full time 4wd, doesn’t have hill descent control or a highly advanced traction control system, and above all doesn’t have the terrain control like OP’s new defender, I’d like to add the fact that some of these are features on the D1, but all of them minus the terrain control are features of the D2 (99-04). And there are a lot more selling points to the older discovery’s and the new defenders as well that make them worth what they are. I know you don’t see it as money well spent, but when you experience a Land Rover, it’s difficult to match anywhere else, from the ride quality to how smooth and refined it is when off the beaten path. Not to mention if OP wanted an old explorer OP would have spent the $300 to get one, but OP wanted a brand spankin new defender, and honestly I would too if I was in a better situation

So... What do we think of that? 90's Explorer trucks versus Land Rovers.
And what do we think about this beaten path he's mentioning? Is it a beaten path straight back to the dealership? There's so much to process here. I feel like it's a lot of smoke aimed at a certain set of people's anuses.

I'm sorry, but I feel like this guy locks his diffs then drives on a gravel road and thinks he's King ****. "I am truly experiencing my Land Rover." That's my take personally.
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





Someone has said this, just now:

it’s a 97 with 265k miles, and I didn’t say all vehicles, just ford. I should mention the 90s ford explorer doesn’t have the air ride suspension, probably doesn’t have a diff lock, doesn’t have heated leather, doesn’t have full time 4wd, doesn’t have hill descent control or a highly advanced traction control system, and above all doesn’t have the terrain control like OP’s new defender, I’d like to add the fact that some of these are features on the D1, but all of them minus the terrain control are features of the D2 (99-04). And there are a lot more selling points to the older discovery’s and the new defenders as well that make them worth what they are. I know you don’t see it as money well spent, but when you experience a Land Rover, it’s difficult to match anywhere else, from the ride quality to how smooth and refined it is when off the beaten path. Not to mention if OP wanted an old explorer OP would have spent the $300 to get one, but OP wanted a brand spankin new defender, and honestly I would too if I was in a better situation

So... What do we think of that? 90's Explorer trucks versus Land Rovers.
And what do we think about this beaten path he's mentioning? Is it a beaten path straight back to the dealership? There's so much to process here. I feel like it's a lot of smoke aimed at a certain set of people's anuses.

I'm sorry, but I feel like this guy locks his diffs then drives on a gravel road and thinks he's King ****. "I am truly experiencing my Land Rover." That's my take personally.
depends. the saying is a land rocer will get you there labd cruiser will get you back. probably in true offrosding like crawling a rover is better tbh. probably has more clearence and theres more aftermarket for it. that said, explorers can defnitely be made into very capable offroaders for say 75% of trails w/o heavy mods such as what gjarrett had done w/ herc. so sure if money was no object provably a defender is better, but its like comparing apples to oranges. explorer more budget in that very easy to find, parts are plentiful, essy to maintain. defender stock probably a hit more capable out of the box and has more aftermarket
 






I'd take the explorer. Cheap to buy, then I'd build it the way I want.
 






Diff locks? Don't know if the 4x4 package on the 98 XLT does that. Maybe in Low? As far as the Land Rover and Defender, what availability do they have for parts? I know we can get parts for the Explorers, although some are hard to find.
 






Diff locks? Don't know if the 4x4 package on the 98 XLT does that. Maybe in Low? As far as the Land Rover and Defender, what availability do they have for parts? I know we can get parts for the Explorers, although some are hard to find.
no these diffs dont lock its only open and limited slip. 2g/4h/4l has nothing to do w lockers. limitrd slip is watered down locker. clutch grips sending power to both sides, but when turning or one wheel in the air, theres not enough preload so it breaks that grip. so no they dont. and the front diff is open only. lockers basically for an e locker use electromagnet to lock both sides together iirc but may be wrong.

there are aftermarket options for the rear, lunchbox lcoker such as powertrax no slip or arb makes an air locker

front its basicaly j powertrax and torsen )but torsen is very similiar in manner to a limited slip)
 






Land Rover is absolute garbage, unless you are talking specific vintage models. Don’t stray too far from the dealer.

If you were a real baller, you’d buy the G Wagen anyways.

That said, stock for stock the Explorer would have no chance, given equal drivers. Just like the Land Rover doesn’t have a chance at making 200k without a laughable amount of repair work.

The second gens definitely had an air ride option, with off road mode, though.
 






Seems pretty silly to try to compare a brand new defender to a 25 year old Explorer, or am I not understanding the original post?
 






All I know is after a whole day or wheeling on some difficult trails with a group
Of lifted explorers here comes a group of brand new land rovers headed down the same trail, all of them stock looking. The kids in the back seats were comfortable with their ac and dvd player headrests the owners all had on nice polo shirts and had no issue making the same trail we just did.
We laugh at them and poke fun, but those modern trucks with their advanced traction control can definitely go places… at the end of the day it’s 80% driver and 20% vehicle

I’m here for the ford reliability and toughness
Land Rover does not have that reputation
The old ones are tough, but also way complex and parts impossible to find for what they are. I would still take an old Ford over a Land Rover any day but they each have their place

Run what ya brung
 






Also, the Land Rover would have very little chance if you put 1/4 of the cost of it into a Second Gen.
 






No brainer for me. Get a 5.0 Ex and build it to wheel.

You’ll still be ahead $75,000(we are talking a new Rover, right?), and you won’t have any problems. The LRs are known for heinous electrical gremlins…even without sending them through streams and ****.

Something breaks? Cheap. May be able to fix it on the trail. LR? Nope.

If you’re talking about leather and automatic this and that…you’re not into wheeling, you’re into whatever glamping is to wheeling.
 






It's a senseless comparison. Get the old explorer and fix it up for trails, then use the tens of thousands saved for a new car that handles far better for daily commutes than the land rover does.

Otherwise, if someone wanted to gift me a brand new Land Rover or Explorer, I'd take the Land Rover, but then sell it before it got old enough that all the additional complexity led to higher repair costs.

Ultimately,
when you experience a Land Rover, it’s difficult to match anywhere else, from the ride quality to how smooth and refined it is when off the beaten path. Not to mention if OP wanted an old explorer OP would have spent the $300 to get one, but OP wanted a brand spankin new defender, and honestly I would too if I was in a better situation

This I strongly disagree with. No way that I'd buy a new Land Rover and put it to task off-road. That is not covered under normal insurance policy wear and tear, and is just going to rag it out and devalue by tens of thousands of dollars. Why? Because it's "more refined"? If I wanted refined I would be at home, not off-roading, lol !!
 






It's a senseless comparison. Get the old explorer and fix it up for trails, then use the tens of thousands saved for a new car that handles far better for daily commutes than the land rover does.

Otherwise, if someone wanted to gift me a brand new Land Rover or Explorer, I'd take the Land Rover, but then sell it before it got old enough that all the additional complexity led to higher repair costs.

Ultimately,


This I strongly disagree with. No way that I'd buy a new Land Rover and put it to task off-road. That is not covered under normal insurance policy wear and tear, and is just going to rag it out and devalue by tens of thousands of dollars. Why? Because it's "more refined"? If I wanted refined I would be at home, not off-roading, lol !!
It’s no more foolish than off-roading a new raptor which people do every day. Typically if you’re buying a Land Rover you have more cents than sense.
 






It’s no more foolish than off-roading a new raptor which people do every day. Typically if you’re buying a Land Rover you have more cents than sense.
true true. but i guess its the inage people have of it. raptor has the offroader tough rep LR has a soccer mom kind of rep imo
 






The same soccer mom rep as the Explorer?
 






Land rovers are used off road all over the world, don’t let it fool you, they will go off road and in style! More capable then a stock explorer

Would I own one? No way Jose
 












All I know is after a whole day or wheeling on some difficult trails with a group
Of lifted explorers here comes a group of brand new land rovers headed down the same trail, all of them stock looking. The kids in the back seats were comfortable with their ac and dvd player headrests the owners all had on nice polo shirts and had no issue making the same trail we just did.
We laugh at them and poke fun, but those modern trucks with their advanced traction control can definitely go places… at the end of the day it’s 80% driver and 20% vehicle

I’m here for the ford reliability and toughness
Land Rover does not have that reputation
The old ones are tough, but also way complex and parts impossible to find for what they are. I would still take an old Ford over a Land Rover any day but they each have their place

Run what ya brung

That's funny you say that. I'm in a good position to comment on that. Just did a 30 mile off road drive in the Sierra's yesterday to check on a friend that we haven't heard from in over 2 weeks at a gold claim (he was ok). Been raining heavy thunderstorms on Fri, Sat and Sun. I took my 2012 Ranger Rover (2" air bag lift kit and 32.5" tires, everything else stock) and loaded with gear since we didn't know what to expect. The truck is just a master off road and has probably the best traction control system on the market (Terrain Response) and way more under chassis clearance than even a new Jeep Rubicon on 35" tires. My passenger could not believe how easy this thing handled mud pits, 12" deep rain ruts, moguls cut across the trial from water run off, etc. The factory rear locker and center transfer case lock work seamlessly to keep the vehicle moving. The only other vehicles that we saw all day was one 4wd Quad and two 4wd Side by Sides. It was just messy conditions from all the rain.

I've owned a 2004 Discovery, a 2013 Range Rover Sport, a 2012 Range Rover and a 2019 Range Rover. Once you've had a Range Rover it is really hard to drive anything else, especially on the road. Super comfortable ride, huge power, built like a tank and when you do need to go off road they make an OK driver look like a pro.
I also have a 1993 Explorer that I bought around 2020 with under 80k original miles. I've put on a 5.5" James Duff lift, front and rear lockers, 5.13 gears and 35" tires. Comparing a built Explorer to my 2012 L322 is interesting....the Range Rover just feels like it effortlessly climbs over and into and out of obstacles. The Explorer does a very good job but it takes a lot more driver talent and works the driver harder. The ride is much more fatiguing, the steering is not as precise, there is more noise and the HVAC system is nowhere near as powerful as the Range Rovers. Here are real world pluses and minuses:

2004 Discovery....bought for my daughter to go to school in. Got it for next to nothing with 40k on it...tons of metal surrounding her and great visibility for a new driver. She put over 60k on it and it never once failed her or stranded her on the road. We had a couple of issues like an EGR valve that threw a check engine light and a leaky intake manifold gasket. Amazingly minimal issues. Other than basic maintenance that was it. It had tons of room, live axles front and rear and was just fun to drive. Downfall was the V8 engine was prone to leaky head gaskets but ours did not fail in the 100k we had it. I was expecting it but I guess we got lucky. It was under powered...could have used another 75 hp to make it really peppy. Another downfall is 12-13 mpg in all around real world driving. We sold it so my daughter could get a more economical car for her work commute now that she is out of school. The sunroof drains can also fail causing a wet headliner. We fixed this by putting a clear piece of paint protection film covering the entire sunroof making it inoperable but no leaks. Much, much cheaper than removing the headliner, etc.

2013 Range Rover Sport....Supercharged V8 with over 500 hp. Really designed for the road with an active front sway bar that made the car feel like a sports car. Never took it off road, only driven in the snow. An absolute hoot to drive....who needs a sports car when this thing just hauls the beans in the stoplight grand prix. We still own the car with over 100k on it. Failures include a leaky fuel injector ( covered under warranty), a fuel pump, (one of three on the truck, it would only throw a code when hot rodding over 90 mph and covered under warranty) and the active sway bar hydraulic pump (covered under warranty). The only failure that stopped the car was the leaky fuel injector. The car ran but ran so rough it didn't feel right to drive. This car averages 13 mph in the city and will easily get 18 mph at freeway speeds. Rougher riding than the full size Range Rover since it is designed more for spirited driving than all out comfort. Biggest disappointment is the lack of interior storage space, even with the rear seats folded forward.

2012 Range Rover (full size)...my daily driver. The L322 model is just a beast of a car when comparing drivetrain components with the LR3, LR4 and the Range Rover Sport (up to 2013). Those three cars all share the same size A-arms, hubs, etc. The L322 parts are much larger when put side by side. The CV's are bigger and stronger and can handle a lift kit with no issues. My failures or problems include a whistle sound from the HVAC system at highway speeds that required a gasket in the defroster air circuit to be replaced under warranty. Didn't affect the drivability, just a noise. The biggest failure was the car just shut off when driving to work one day and would not restart. Engine spun over but would not fire. Turned out to be the in tank fuel pump relay wire had broken the circuit. This would have definitely stranded the truck unless towed to a shop for repair. It was covered under warranty but it was a major failure since the car was not drivable. The truck is super plush to drive, has an incredible HVAC system, air conditioned seats, 510 hp and feels like a vault. But the super charged V8 comes with giant front Brembo brakes...they work great but you cannot go smaller than a 20" diameter wheel. The non supercharged V8 trucks come with smaller front brakes that can accept an 18" diameter wheel allowing for more sidewall and air down potential. The biggest issue is the lack of interior storage space when loading up the rig for trips. As big as the L322 is, my 1993 Explorer has at least 30% more usable storage when the seats are folded down. I can sleep in the Explorer but not in the Ranger Rover, even if the rear seats are folded down.

2019 Range Rover....great street truck, super quiet and smooth. I would not take it off road with 21" rims. Built like a tank and you feel very safe in it. It has a supercharged V6 that is underpowered for the weight of the truck but gets over 22 mpg on long highway drives and averages 18 mpg in city commute. Wife likes it, I like how safe you feel in it but I prefer my 2012 Range Rover. Nothing has failed on that truck in 40k miles but it has the stupid auto stop that makes the truck turn off at stoplights when idling, like most new car. You have to manually disable it every time you start the truck. That's the kind of crap that drives me crazy. Not the roomiest interior for storage, but it has more than my L322.

My 1993 Explorer was probably the most cream puff truck I could find. I knew I was going to build it up as a trail rig for narrow two track trails in the Sierras. Even though the truck had very low miles, a lot of little things fail on a truck that is 30 years old. Plastic parts, HVAC bits and pieces, window regulators, door latches, etc. Plastic deteriorates with age, vacuum hose fittings and rubber hoses crack, radiators, power steering hoses, etc. I've spent more than the trucks purchase price to make everything "right" and still there is always something to fix. The engine is under powered and the auto transmission is not the strongest out there. The transfer case has been good (wish it had a lower low range) and the front and rear axles are plenty strong for a truck this weight. I love the useable interior room, the simple dash layout and the narrow track of the truck. I really wish the truck had a stronger A/C for those 110 degree days. Mileage is still impressive even with the low gears and big tires...I average 15-16 mpg in running around. Biggest failure point was the shift linkage inside the auto trans fell apart locking my shift column in drive. Once I figured out what was going on I could get under the truck and tap the pan while somebody moved the shift lever to park so the car could start. Lots of little issues but nothing that shut down the truck to make it un-drivable. I love square body trucks and the first gen's are a sexy look.

Everything has it's pluses and minuses....if you do have a Range Rover that is out of warranty, find a good independent Land Rover mechanic shop. I only let the dealer work on my cars when they are under warranty....not been happy with either my Ford dealer or Land Rover dealer for repair quality. Land Rover parts are really no more money than a new Explorer's parts cost. And because there are so many Land Rovers out there, the options for generic parts helps lower the cost. I would never drive an older Land Rover Defender (the live axle ones, especially pre-1990's). Those things are essentially tractors with a license plate. Very loud, not super great off road when stock (no lockers/ LSD, not great articulation, small tires, way under powered), minimal HVAC and crap to drive on the freeway. But they look cool as hell and have a lot of history.
 






That's funny you say that. I'm in a good position to comment on that. Just did a 30 mile off road drive in the Sierra's yesterday to check on a friend that we haven't heard from in over 2 weeks at a gold claim (he was ok). Been raining heavy thunderstorms on Fri, Sat and Sun. I took my 2012 Ranger Rover (2" air bag lift kit and 32.5" tires, everything else stock) and loaded with gear since we didn't know what to expect. The truck is just a master off road and has probably the best traction control system on the market (Terrain Response) and way more under chassis clearance than even a new Jeep Rubicon on 35" tires. My passenger could not believe how easy this thing handled mud pits, 12" deep rain ruts, moguls cut across the trial from water run off, etc. The factory rear locker and center transfer case lock work seamlessly to keep the vehicle moving. The only other vehicles that we saw all day was one 4wd Quad and two 4wd Side by Sides. It was just messy conditions from all the rain.

I've owned a 2004 Discovery, a 2013 Range Rover Sport, a 2012 Range Rover and a 2019 Range Rover. Once you've had a Range Rover it is really hard to drive anything else, especially on the road. Super comfortable ride, huge power, built like a tank and when you do need to go off road they make an OK driver look like a pro.
I also have a 1993 Explorer that I bought around 2020 with under 80k original miles. I've put on a 5.5" James Duff lift, front and rear lockers, 5.13 gears and 35" tires. Comparing a built Explorer to my 2012 L322 is interesting....the Range Rover just feels like it effortlessly climbs over and into and out of obstacles. The Explorer does a very good job but it takes a lot more driver talent and works the driver harder. The ride is much more fatiguing, the steering is not as precise, there is more noise and the HVAC system is nowhere near as powerful as the Range Rovers. Here are real world pluses and minuses:

2004 Discovery....bought for my daughter to go to school in. Got it for next to nothing with 40k on it...tons of metal surrounding her and great visibility for a new driver. She put over 60k on it and it never once failed her or stranded her on the road. We had a couple of issues like an EGR valve that threw a check engine light and a leaky intake manifold gasket. Amazingly minimal issues. Other than basic maintenance that was it. It had tons of room, live axles front and rear and was just fun to drive. Downfall was the V8 engine was prone to leaky head gaskets but ours did not fail in the 100k we had it. I was expecting it but I guess we got lucky. It was under powered...could have used another 75 hp to make it really peppy. Another downfall is 12-13 mpg in all around real world driving. We sold it so my daughter could get a more economical car for her work commute now that she is out of school. The sunroof drains can also fail causing a wet headliner. We fixed this by putting a clear piece of paint protection film covering the entire sunroof making it inoperable but no leaks. Much, much cheaper than removing the headliner, etc.

2013 Range Rover Sport....Supercharged V8 with over 500 hp. Really designed for the road with an active front sway bar that made the car feel like a sports car. Never took it off road, only driven in the snow. An absolute hoot to drive....who needs a sports car when this thing just hauls the beans in the stoplight grand prix. We still own the car with over 100k on it. Failures include a leaky fuel injector ( covered under warranty), a fuel pump, (one of three on the truck, it would only throw a code when hot rodding over 90 mph and covered under warranty) and the active sway bar hydraulic pump (covered under warranty). The only failure that stopped the car was the leaky fuel injector. The car ran but ran so rough it didn't feel right to drive. This car averages 13 mph in the city and will easily get 18 mph at freeway speeds. Rougher riding than the full size Range Rover since it is designed more for spirited driving than all out comfort. Biggest disappointment is the lack of interior storage space, even with the rear seats folded forward.

2012 Range Rover (full size)...my daily driver. The L322 model is just a beast of a car when comparing drivetrain components with the LR3, LR4 and the Range Rover Sport (up to 2013). Those three cars all share the same size A-arms, hubs, etc. The L322 parts are much larger when put side by side. The CV's are bigger and stronger and can handle a lift kit with no issues. My failures or problems include a whistle sound from the HVAC system at highway speeds that required a gasket in the defroster air circuit to be replaced under warranty. Didn't affect the drivability, just a noise. The biggest failure was the car just shut off when driving to work one day and would not restart. Engine spun over but would not fire. Turned out to be the in tank fuel pump relay wire had broken the circuit. This would have definitely stranded the truck unless towed to a shop for repair. It was covered under warranty but it was a major failure since the car was not drivable. The truck is super plush to drive, has an incredible HVAC system, air conditioned seats, 510 hp and feels like a vault. But the super charged V8 comes with giant front Brembo brakes...they work great but you cannot go smaller than a 20" diameter wheel. The non supercharged V8 trucks come with smaller front brakes that can accept an 18" diameter wheel allowing for more sidewall and air down potential. The biggest issue is the lack of interior storage space when loading up the rig for trips. As big as the L322 is, my 1993 Explorer has at least 30% more usable storage when the seats are folded down. I can sleep in the Explorer but not in the Ranger Rover, even if the rear seats are folded down.

2019 Range Rover....great street truck, super quiet and smooth. I would not take it off road with 21" rims. Built like a tank and you feel very safe in it. It has a supercharged V6 that is underpowered for the weight of the truck but gets over 22 mpg on long highway drives and averages 18 mpg in city commute. Wife likes it, I like how safe you feel in it but I prefer my 2012 Range Rover. Nothing has failed on that truck in 40k miles but it has the stupid auto stop that makes the truck turn off at stoplights when idling, like most new car. You have to manually disable it every time you start the truck. That's the kind of crap that drives me crazy. Not the roomiest interior for storage, but it has more than my L322.

My 1993 Explorer was probably the most cream puff truck I could find. I knew I was going to build it up as a trail rig for narrow two track trails in the Sierras. Even though the truck had very low miles, a lot of little things fail on a truck that is 30 years old. Plastic parts, HVAC bits and pieces, window regulators, door latches, etc. Plastic deteriorates with age, vacuum hose fittings and rubber hoses crack, radiators, power steering hoses, etc. I've spent more than the trucks purchase price to make everything "right" and still there is always something to fix. The engine is under powered and the auto transmission is not the strongest out there. The transfer case has been good (wish it had a lower low range) and the front and rear axles are plenty strong for a truck this weight. I love the useable interior room, the simple dash layout and the narrow track of the truck. I really wish the truck had a stronger A/C for those 110 degree days. Mileage is still impressive even with the low gears and big tires...I average 15-16 mpg in running around. Biggest failure point was the shift linkage inside the auto trans fell apart locking my shift column in drive. Once I figured out what was going on I could get under the truck and tap the pan while somebody moved the shift lever to park so the car could start. Lots of little issues but nothing that shut down the truck to make it un-drivable. I love square body trucks and the first gen's are a sexy look.

Everything has it's pluses and minuses....if you do have a Range Rover that is out of warranty, find a good independent Land Rover mechanic shop. I only let the dealer work on my cars when they are under warranty....not been happy with either my Ford dealer or Land Rover dealer for repair quality. Land Rover parts are really no more money than a new Explorer's parts cost. And because there are so many Land Rovers out there, the options for generic parts helps lower the cost. I would never drive an older Land Rover Defender (the live axle ones, especially pre-1990's). Those things are essentially tractors with a license plate. Very loud, not super great off road when stock (no lockers/ LSD, not great articulation, small tires, way under powered), minimal HVAC and crap to drive on the freeway. But they look cool as hell and have a lot of history.
valid point. as someone who has wheeled the sierras, these explorers though are plenty cacapble, but i will admit it takes a good deal more skill to wheel these than it would for a LR i imagine(comparing to new 4runner here) where the 4runner walked up w traction control, explorer needed to pick a line and do a little brake/gas action to get the LS to grab in hilly rutted secions. but in fairness the explorer only costs a fraction of the 4runner let alone the LR, but also takes possibly a bit more stuff to replace wjth age
 






Featured Content

Back
Top