slovic
Member
- Joined
- November 21, 2001
- Messages
- 18
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- paso robles, ca
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- hmm
I thought I would start a new thread, my previous thread was getting long. It was a great thread with alot of good suggestions and info. Thank you all for your input.
Well it is obvious the AOD/AODE is the choice based on your opinions. We have decided to start R&D on an adapter to mate the 4.0 block to the AOD. I want to speed up our R&D, I could use some more help to speed this along. Here is a concern, The AOD was only used with the larger 164 tooth flexplate. This means the bellhousing portion of the trans is quite larger than the a4ld. My question is: What is the clearance like in your tunnel area now with the a4ld? If minimal, we could have a body lift issue here. thanks for any input and feel free to call, ext 530
p.s. this posting is starting to get commercial, I hate when companies try to pimp their goods on posting boards. I hope you all see an exemption here. Any way you look at it, YOU ARE SCRE***(I had to edit this, my opinions of the a4ld are not going over well with some of the auto industry
Well it is obvious the AOD/AODE is the choice based on your opinions. We have decided to start R&D on an adapter to mate the 4.0 block to the AOD. I want to speed up our R&D, I could use some more help to speed this along. Here is a concern, The AOD was only used with the larger 164 tooth flexplate. This means the bellhousing portion of the trans is quite larger than the a4ld. My question is: What is the clearance like in your tunnel area now with the a4ld? If minimal, we could have a body lift issue here. thanks for any input and feel free to call, ext 530
p.s. this posting is starting to get commercial, I hate when companies try to pimp their goods on posting boards. I hope you all see an exemption here. Any way you look at it, YOU ARE SCRE***(I had to edit this, my opinions of the a4ld are not going over well with some of the auto industry