Axle width???? | Page 2 | Ford Explorer Forums

  • Register Today It's free!

Axle width????

dreamr said:
I actually prefer the idea of using a D30 if I do this in my garage. If it is built for me they want to use the 44.

Tire size would be ideal to maintain at 33" but 35" if I have to much wheel well showing.

Gears would be kept at 4.56 as that is what I am running currently and don't want to change again.
IMHO, with a max tire size of 35, and max low r&p of 4.56, while trying to maintain stock width and bolt pattern.........you are a perfect candidate for a Jeep YJ or XJ HP D30. The D30 r&p, although relatively small (and unpopular), IS strong while only running 4.56 gears. You can pick up the bare axle for very little $$$, and then pick up a used (or new if budget allows) set of Warn shafts with 297x joints, and that axle would be comparable to a LP D44 (if anyone wants to flame me for that statement, bring some facts, not just the typical "D44s are stronger" crap).
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





I was hoping somebody would say that about the D30 as it is my preference and greatly simplifies the project as well as lowering the cost factor considerably.

So Am I correct in believing that the wranglers run leafs and the cherokee's run coils, or is that dependent upon the model year?
 






Hmmm,,,,,,,,













I've gotta check the latest bank heists. Dreamr has way to much money.














I'm watching :cool:
 






Albino 94LTD said:
I've gotta check the latest bank heists. Dreamr has way to much money.

I wish I had more :(

But if I budget well I can spread this out over time and it won't seem like that much. Piece by piece things aren't that expensive. Especially if I don't have to pay for labor and fab work. At least no more expensive than a set of wheel bearings which are humming lightly (220 each), and CV axles (310 each) that will likely break one day with the bigger tires and TT.

A solid axle is so much less money to maintain and less worries.
If I had the TTB I wouldn't worry about it all. This IFS is CRAP!

Now if I can just get started and still get in my garage when done.
Though it will likely not happen till at least winter, I would like to start on the axle build-up at least.
I have 80" of clearance from floor to the garage door at it's lowest point.
My truck currently sits at about 74.5" at it's tallest point, so I should be OK after I pull the body lift.

What a waste of money having got it to it's current point only to start tearing it all apart again. Maybe I won't but we'll see...................
If I do, you should let me put the body lift on yours Phil :cool:
 






dreamr said:
There are a lot of fullsize trucks...........stuck between the trees :D

Hahah, he's not kidding. NW trails are TIGHT I've only seen one group of fullsizes up at TSF where I wheel mostly and they were struggling. I feel like my 4 door is too big for a lot of the trails I go on, wish i had a sport for wheeling but need the four door for other stuff.
 






dreamr said:
Another Q do they make an adapter that can drop a 5 on 5.5 to 5 on 4.5 so I can keep my current wheels If I choose this route??? I know I just contraindicted my last post but I am pondering as I said.
If I'm reading this right, You cannot use a 5x4.5 rim on a 5x5.5 front end, as the hub will not fit through the center of the wheel.
Now the other way around you can do. My rear end is still 5x4.5 with a 1" spacer/adapter and 5x5.5 rims

Robb, the reason I went with the D44 over the D30 is not the diff strength. I agree that with 33's, 4.56's and locker a HP D30 would be fine. Its the rest of the axle that I didn't like. The D30 knuckles are much smaller, the whole hub assembly (which I was trying to get away from by going solid), the outer stub axle is tiny compared to a D44 (which is what Jeeps start breaking when they lock the front), and the lack of manual hubs, so that you could still run the truck if you broke a u-joint, etc. Yes, most of that is upgradable, but at what cost.

dreamr said:
So Am I correct in believing that the wranglers run leafs and the cherokee's run coils, or is that dependent upon the model year?
Depends on the year. 98+ Wrangers (TJ) runs springs but is LP D30, pre98 wranglers (YJ) run leaves & HP D30. Cherokees (XJ) are coils and HP D30 till 99 and LP 00-02. And the Grand Cherokee (ZJ) is coiled LP D30 (I never understood that one :confused: )

Oh and the original question. ~58" or so (both front and rear) Any suitible jeep axle is about ~60"
 






So Jefe, explain the hub assembly on the D30.

One of my main reasons for thinking about this is to eliminate the whole hub/bearing assembly as well as the CV's. The extra travel is obviously part of the reason, but the stronger parts are the driving force. If I still have to deal with the bloody expensive auto hub/bearing assembly mess then I'll go for the 44. Then again I like the idea of having an axle that can work with my control trac system without locking hubs. I still use auto on really wet days (which is frequent here). Note too that I really don't wheel that hard, this rig gets used, but not like yours :D

I do need to do more research, but the more I read the more confused I get. It's easier to just ask all of you who have already walked this road and learned from experience.

As to the axle, then I guess I want a 95-99 (95 I believe is when the better u-joints were used?) XJ axle and I'll need to space the rear a bit to even it up?
 






dreamr said:
So Jefe, explain the hub assembly on the D30.
Same type sealed assembly as you currently have. I believe they may be cheaper, but still, its all or nothing. I'll take my $50 worth of bearings (that I can grease as I please) any day.
 






Jefe said:
Same type sealed assembly as you currently have. I believe they may be cheaper, but still, its all or nothing. I'll take my $50 worth of bearings (that I can grease as I please) any day.


Hmm there's a few more points to going with the 44.
I too would much rather grease the bearings on occasion than dish out the cash for the sealed units.
 












Featured Content

Back
Top