Good thought, they need to be strong enough to resist that length change force of the axles. It takes a good strong tug to pull them apart.
Thanks! At least, I'm not 'called down" here for "overthinking issues". (Stang.net). There, they resent greatly any new member intruding upon their little "clique". They know it all.
Anyhow, the axial forces exerted by CV Joints must be pretty low, until the joints become seriously deteriorated. The C-Clip idea provided a simple means of keeping the axles fairly stable while still allowing easy disassembly when necessary. 40 years ago, I encountered them on my '78 Fiesta. Then, I thought they were Mickey Mouse. Had I been designing the car for maximum performance, I'd've sought a more positive way. But, they worked, so long as you didn't push the limits, replace them each time during disassembly (why?), I dunno. Precautionary, I guess.
Reality is, Front Wheel Drive is only as good as it's design. The outer CVs must remain aligned with the axis throught the steering knuckle as it rotates to steer the vehicle. Circlips provide that requirement. Meanwhile, as suspension travels up and down, it describes an arc causing the axle to get "longer and shorter", like the slip-joint on a rear wheel drive driveshaft. That apparent change in mounted length is accomplished by CVs having the ability to let the axle push "in and out". With Rzeppa joints, this required a very complicated machined pair of parts to allow the balls driving the joint to comply. Fiesta had this type. I think mainly gone now, today's use either a two-lobed or three-lobed gizmo having rollers mounted on a yoke similar to the old Cardan, which mesh within a stamped steel housing allowing them to swivel back and forth as the angle of operation changes, and slide in and out to accomodate axle length change.
So, I HATE FRONT WHEEL DRIVE!
